- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father (Not Guilty) of killing drunk driver who killed his sons.Update
Posted on 8/27/14 at 5:37 pm to TigerFred
Posted on 8/27/14 at 5:37 pm to TigerFred
That first article the OP posted included none of those facts you just posted.
Ignorant of the full facts, yes.
Being disingenuous for the sake of argument, no.
Ignorant of the full facts, yes.
Being disingenuous for the sake of argument, no.
1
Posted on 8/27/14 at 5:42 pm to TH03
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:27 pm to Tigerlaff
My question is how did it even get to the jury phase?
If there were any tangible evidence that said he did it then i would understand. You can't have people playing judge jury and executioner no matter how bad the crime. I just sets a bad precedent. From what i am seeing here though is that the ONLY evidence they had was motive.
How did this not get thrown out at the pre-jury phase? Doesn't the prosecution have to meet some standard of evidence once charges are filed?
I mean this guy probably had to spend a good bit on a lawyer to fight this bullshite. If i were him i would sue the shite out of the DA's office for taking him to trial with so little.
If there were any tangible evidence that said he did it then i would understand. You can't have people playing judge jury and executioner no matter how bad the crime. I just sets a bad precedent. From what i am seeing here though is that the ONLY evidence they had was motive.
How did this not get thrown out at the pre-jury phase? Doesn't the prosecution have to meet some standard of evidence once charges are filed?
I mean this guy probably had to spend a good bit on a lawyer to fight this bullshite. If i were him i would sue the shite out of the DA's office for taking him to trial with so little.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:30 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Oh well, it's not like a dangerous murderer is free on the streets.
I know right? It's a good thing someone killed that son of a bitch.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:32 pm to TH03
Overall just being an arse? Yes.
Insulting other posters before reading the article? Yes.
Pretending to know more than you actually do? Yes.
Sounds like a regular day for you.
(drops mic, walks off)
Insulting other posters before reading the article? Yes.
Pretending to know more than you actually do? Yes.
Sounds like a regular day for you.
(drops mic, walks off)
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:33 pm to Tigerlaff
Hopefully the idiot dad gets charged with child endangerment.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:33 pm to boom roasted
Zero surprise. Maybe watch sleepers and will have a clue what may have happened here. 
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:54 pm to Tigerlaff
Jury Nullification 
If you care about freedom and getting some control back over runaway government, then teach your family and friends about jury nullification.
The government is very sensitive about it and does not want knowledge of it to spread. It would rather the public be ignorant of the concept so much so that it has arrested people for passing out pamphlets about it.
Why every American need ot learn about this taboo subject
If you care about freedom and getting some control back over runaway government, then teach your family and friends about jury nullification.
The government is very sensitive about it and does not want knowledge of it to spread. It would rather the public be ignorant of the concept so much so that it has arrested people for passing out pamphlets about it.
Why every American need ot learn about this taboo subject
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:57 pm to boom roasted
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:57 pm to TrueTiger
Chances this guy gets whacked? I'd say pretty good.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:00 pm to TH03
quote:
yes, he's a murderer, you idiot.
Wrong
quote:
we have laws and trials for a reason.
Right
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:18 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
we have laws and trials for a reason.
Like the one that allows jurors to vote how the want regardless of what the judge says. That is a good law.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:31 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:
What vexes me about it is the statement that the father would not have known of the drivers alcohol level at the time...so in his mind he wasn't killing someone for drunk driving that killed his kids, only an auto accident on a dark road.
When he himself put his kids in a dangerous position. People making him out to be a hero need to reevaluate.
Page 23 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News