- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/23 at 5:23 pm to Breauxsif
Offering obedience to fraternity bullchit is root cause #1.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 5:38 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
I think it is 2 percent of $6.1 million.
Louisiana article 2323 (comparative fault).
So, in a case such as this, the jury determines the family is to receive $6.1M from the various parties at fault. Do they then place a percentage owed by each person/entity at fault? Or is that done before hand? Concurrently?
Are they allowed to consider that the victim in the case may have been at fault, and if so, do they place a percentage on him/her as well to subtract from the final damages?
It seems like all of the various parties found to be at fault would all file separate appeals of the verdict as well as their percentage owed. Meaning years of deliberations and court filings.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 5:47 pm to Beef Tips
quote:
You'd be amazed at the self-destructive steps someone will take to be accepted or fit in.
I agree with this and no doubt Max initially participated, however IIRC they poured liquor down his barely conscious throat and didn't render aid when they should have? Did I remember this story right?
Posted on 3/11/23 at 5:55 pm to Misnomer
quote:
however IIRC they poured liquor down his barely conscious throat
I think that would generate criminal charges at that point?
Posted on 3/11/23 at 5:55 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
It seems like all of the various parties found to be at fault would all file separate appeals of the verdict as well as their percentage owed. Meaning years of deliberations and court filings.
They aren't appealing shite because the defendants all settled before the trial.
quote:
The Gruvers sued LSU, Phi Delta Theta, and multiple fraternity members over their sons death. By the time of the civil trial this week, they had reached settlements with all defendants except fraternity member Ryan Matthew Isto and his insurance company.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 6:16 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
I think that would generate criminal charges at that point?
quote:
A former Louisiana State University student has been sentenced to five years in prison in the 2017 hazing death of fraternity pledge Max Gruver
Abcnews
Im looking for the details. Not 100% sure but do I remember them giving him liquor when he was helpless FUBAR and telling him it was water? It was a long time ago. They definitely had responsibility in getting his BAC to an astounding .495.
I'm good with the fraternity being sued...stupid enough to plan an event to haze kids with binging hard liquor. Make an expensive example out of that shite.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 6:19 pm to nicholastiger
Christ the King is using the house for student ministers.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 6:52 pm to Misnomer
quote:
The Gruvers sued LSU, Phi Delta Theta, and multiple fraternity members over their sons death. By the time of the civil trial this week, they had reached settlements with all defendants except fraternity member Ryan Matthew Isto and his insurance company.
Got it.
So the trial verdict sets damages at $6.1M and declares that Isto was 2% at fault and thereby owes 2% of the $6.1M. My question was more to the order of things. Did Isto's attorneys/insurance carrier know going into trial that he would owe 2% of any damages awarded? Or was that decided at trial?
Posted on 3/11/23 at 6:56 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
I think it is 2 percent of $6.1 million. Louisiana article 2323 (comparative fault). I’ll look it up, but that’s what I heard.
You think?
This post was edited on 3/11/23 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 3/11/23 at 7:10 pm to Tomatocantender
State cap. LSU isn’t a deep pocket here.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 8:00 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Found the verdict form. Everyone had settled except Ryan Isto. He was apportioned 2% liability. They can recover $122,000 on that judgment.
Defense verdict then.
I still think the kid bears the majority of the fault; he knew what he was getting into. All he had to do was walkaway.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 8:01 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
Did Isto's attorneys/insurance carrier know going into trial that he would owe 2% of any damages awarded? Or was that decided at trial?
Jury decided that. I bet the family had $250k in coverage plus an umbrella. I’m sure the kid’s family wanted limits so kudos to Allstate for telling them to go prove their case to a jury.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 8:01 pm to Breauxsif
Gruver looks like he was transitioning
Popular
Back to top

0







