re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

quote:

---

What you are demanding?

---

I demand laws to protect children from their insane progressive guardians. I demand a complete 180 on the medical care options and requirements for people wanting to dismember themselves (i.e. let's make sure we aren't enabling a mentally unstable person before cutting their dick or tits off and chemically altering their biology.) I demand protections for girls in schools and athletics. I don't demand but highly suggest gender dysphoric people get the frick over being "misgendered" in daily interactions, especially since it's all made up anyway and by admission, a guy dressing as a woman doesn't present a clear indication of his gender (in other words, pronoun use is almost exclusively based on sex, which you agree there are only two and they are completely and utterly distinct from gender.) A lot of the drama would go away if people stopped being losers about this stuff.

I absolutely demand that you tolerate, embrace, and celebrate my point of view and who I prefer to sleep with, otherwise face social and if I can help it, financial consequences. Just kidding, that's the rabid progressive sect of the trans community.

quote:

---

who do not self identify as the gender that society would identify them as.

---

We used to call these people tomboys. I was one of those growing up. I still am, really. The thing about the word tomboy is that it is a title given to a GIRL. Even though a tomboy might be into stereotypical boy stuff, it’s still understood that she is a girl. Are today’s tomboys just calling themselves boys? If so, that’s incredibly regressive and a narrowing of what a woman is allowed to be. We used to be allowed to be into sports, hate shopping, and still be considered women.

quote:

---

Gender - outside of masculine and feminine - is completely fabricated.

The concept of gender originated as a linguistic concept for Latin-derived languages. At its base, gender is simple the outward characteristics of sex. Thus, something can be masculine or feminine. It’s can be on a scale but the scale is limited to two umbrellas of characteristics. There is no third. Gender is also not an object and thus cannot be an identity. You can have a feminine man or a masculine woman but nothing will ever refined the former as anything but a man or the latter a woman.

So, like I said, modern gender theory is a complete and utter fabrication.

---

Well and succinctly stated. The concept of "gender" and the PR campaign around it is nothing more than a phantom; dogs chasing tails; just as inane as arguing that there's 500 different descriptors of mattress firmness when in fact, two labels more than suffice: "firm" and "soft."

It's nothing but academia jerkoff material. People like Awgusta could write a 300-page dissertation on it without saying anything of true substance.

All the bluster about "X number of genders" can be boiled down really to one simple word: personality.

A female that likes baseball doesn't become some type of new creature that needs to be labeled as "gender #52;" She's just a girl who likes baseball. Maybe she likes it because her older brother likes it. Maybe she likes it because she likes the idea of hitting things with a club. Maybe she likes it because she thinks Aaron Judge is cute. It doesn't fricking matter. She's still a girl. Not some inhuman monstrosity that the progressive deconstructionists are trying to force upon her.

quote:

---

The moment you show me evidence that a man in a dress reading Clifford causes sexual trauma

---

Show me evidence this movement isn't solely to groom children.
.you can't

quote:

---

The moment you show me evidence that a man in a dress reading Clifford causes sexual trauma or has the magical power to cause the "gay", I'll buy the first ounce of your pearl clutching.

---

Since we're not the ones trying to change the paradigm, it only makes sense that the burden of proof falls in the opposite direction.

Show us the evidence that drag queens reading to children in any way, shape, or form increases child literacy or literary appreciation any more than a non drag-queen doing the reading.

And if your response is that storybook hour isn't about promoting child literacy and appreciation for literature then....

The Perverts are taking over

quote:

---

I also want to use the state to impose my POV on sex with minors, rape, murder, tortious acts, etc.

---

If you cant see the difference between dehumanizing or even criminalizing expressions and thoughts you disagree with, with violating another person's bodily autonomy through violence, don't know what to tell you.

quote:

---

Since we're not the ones trying to change the paradigm it only makes sense that the burden of proof falls in the opposite direction.

---

Most states do not have laws against men in feminine attire or makeup reading books to kids. Hence all the laws and ordinances attempting to now ban it. Proud Boys showing up to try and intimidate people they do.

I'm not the one claiming that men in dresses reading Clifford does harm to children and trying to ban it, you are.

quote:

---

I'm not the one claiming that men in dresses reading Clifford does harm to children and trying to ban it, you are.

---

Nice try, "scientist." You want to change the paradigm and start doing something different that will - assumedly - offer more benefits for developing children. Do you understand how science works?

I said to show us the evidence that drag queen story hour is a net positive for a child's literary development over a reader who isn't a drag queen. Why is this programming necessary and beneficial for kids?

Or to phrase it a bit more bluntly: who the frick even decided that drag queens and children's storybook hour should be combined? They clearly are not birds of a feather (except to a pedophile, I suppose...). So what was the goal and intended outcome?

quote:

---

Most everyone in society conflates them because they have become irrevocably linked. When a trans woman can compete with biological females, or win female centric awards, you are conflating sex and gender. When a progressive monster decides their 4 year old son is a girl and starts hormone blockers, you are conflating sex and gender.

---

They know this. These people are trained to lie. This is what they do. They make up a fairy tale, claim it is real, then cancel anyone that doesn't conform to their nonsense.

Again, you can't reason with people who would fleece you, jail you, and frick your kids, all because you don't agree with them on bullshite like this.

quote:

---

Why, when simultaneously the same people are trying to undermine the concept of gender altogether. Is that the goal, to erase all symbols and norms geared around feminism and masculinity? It seems like it, and at that point, the rabid sect of the trans community has become exactly what they claim to hate, intolerant assholes who demand conformance of your lifestyle to their own.

---

BINGO. It is a RELIGION. Period. Don't worry though, they will tell you that your religion is harmful.....

Well, unless you are a Muslim, then they will leave you alone because they can't bully them.