- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Faces of 4chan and Q thread posters
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:02 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:02 pm to cajunangelle
quote:I’m not really sure who you’re talking about, but it’s not me...
I haven't posted about Q near as much as in your mind. Your childish melt makes everyones points that ya'll are so invested you can't even think outside of the chans. You refuse to see anything else but that Q is almost God like.
Lots of shite you just threw at me that has absolutely nothing to do with anything I have ever posted. Who’s childish again?
Don’t really care to go back and forth with you, as I know you are incapable and are emotionally unstable abut the Q thing so I’m not really one to poke at you. In fact, believe it or not, I often tell people to leave you alone about it but you can think what you want. I’m responding to what you said in this thread.
quote:
your Q thread has Mother Teresa a sex trafficker with upvotes.
My q thread.... ha. I didn’t post in the qt for over 6 months as I was done with the bs. You can get fricked ca. I don’t care what anyone thinks about Q, nor have I ever pushed it.
Not sure why you assumed what kind of response I’d give you. But I thought it was pretty civil.
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 3:08 pm
0
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:04 pm to DarthRebel
Yep and there is two pages nowadays of Snopes and the media saying she didn't 
LINK
Is this where we get into trouble for a poli thread on the OT?
LINK
Is this where we get into trouble for a poli thread on the OT?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:07 pm to cajunangelle
Q posters live at their mom's house.....way to late in life
And say Roll Tide ....a lot
And say Roll Tide ....a lot
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:10 pm to Anfieldtiger8
quote:
Q posters live at their mom's house
Apologies to the LLotOT for the above humor
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:11 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
Don't you just hate those inconvenient truths
It'd be inconvenient if it were actually true, but it is not. Some Hillary supporters floated it, but she nor her campaign ever did.
And the first birther claims actually came way back in 2004 by an Illinois political activist.
LINK
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:17 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Some Hillary supporters floated it, but she nor her campaign ever did.
Oops, I forgot HRC is clean as a whistle.
You just keep that dream alive and it could be her turn.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:18 pm to The Spleen
quote:
But because Trump likes to offer Obama incentives to produce, I will do a mini-Trump with Trump himself. If Trump has any evidence, credible evidence such as credit card records, hotel records, etc. to confirm the identity of any investigators he sent to Hawai’i, and he also has “unbelievable” evidence previously undisclosed and unknown to the American people, I will donate $1,000 (sorry, that's all I can afford) to any charity Trump designates if he produces his records and information in a form reasonably admissible in any court of law.
Lolz.
That blog is pathetic
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:20 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
I forgot HRC is clean as a whistle.
No, she sucks. But she didn't start the birther crap, or even participate in it.
But if you can find me a video clip or legitimate news article that quotes her questioning Obama's legitimacy as a natural born US citizen, I'll correct myself.
There was a memo circulated in her campaign where it was floated as a way to attack Obama, but it was never acted upon, and she was not the author of it.
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 8/5/19 at 3:24 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
So, if it's proven that Brennan/Clapper/McCabe/Comey actively conspired with Barack Obama himself ("POTUS wants to know everything we're doing") to derail/subvert the Trump presidency for political purposes, that doesn't meet the definition of 'Treason' for you?
Do you still think the constitution mandates death... or even the congressional law, as actually dictated by the constitution? This info wasn't hiding anywhere, plain text and easy to find in under 30 seconds... yet the people who scream research it for yourself turn out to be the most clueless of them all. And i don't think you had your scope narrowed to just them, so you can stop moving the goal posts meow.
Great use of if btw... here's one for you, if they are proven to have done such it likely won't be based on information parroted in a Q thread.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:07 pm to MoarKilometers
The if was for your benefit, not mine. You can politely frick yourself in the ear until your brain rattles.
Treason is punishable by death, and if it's not sentenced that way, the convicted is getting away with less than they deserve.
Treason is punishable by death, and if it's not sentenced that way, the convicted is getting away with less than they deserve.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:26 pm to MoarKilometers
Here's the question I've never seen anyone really answer. IF McCabe, Comey, Obama, et al, were hellbent on taking Trump down, why wasn't it public knowledge there was an open FBI investigation into the Trump campaign? We all knew they were investigating Hillary, and there's little question it was damaging to her. Seems one of them could have just coordinated a leak of that investigation and the nature of it to damage his campaign.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:34 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Here's the question I've never seen anyone really answer. IF McCabe, Comey, Obama, et al, were hellbent on taking Trump down, why wasn't it public knowledge there was an open FBI investigation into the Trump campaign? We all knew they were investigating Hillary, and there's little question it was damaging to her. Seems one of them could have just coordinated a leak of that investigation and the nature of it to damage his campaign.
Please, please don't apply logic!!!! Everyone knows that Comey was trying to make sure that Trump lost the election by announcing a week before the election that they were re-opening the Hillary email investigation to comb through Huma's emails.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:45 pm to ragincajun77
By going through counter-intelligence channels, they could use the FISA courts to spy on the Trump campaign in secret as a way to funnel dirt to the Clinton campaign. After the DNC email leaks, the DNC had to nuke their servers via beach bit, meaning much of their stored campaign research went with it. The dossier was then crafted to help justify using the FISA warrant program to monitor the communications of all of Trump’s campaign inner circle, and to funnel that information through the intelligence community to law enforcement and eventually to the DNC.
By keeping all of this under wraps, Comey could tell Trump he wasn’t under investigation (because said investigation was through counter-intelligence), the investigation materials could not be made public through Freedom of Information Act Requests, and when Trump fired Comey, the fact that the secret investigation was ongoing (to justify the FISA spying) could then be used to run the “Obstruction of Justice” narrative.
It was a complex web of conspiracy, but it had to be to keep the house of cards standing for so long. They really thought they could use this to either pressure Trump to resign, goad him into committing an impeachable offense, and/or swing the 2018/2020 elections against Trump. The conspiracy has now been proven true beyond a doubt, the Obstruction narrative proven false, the Russians hacked the election narrative proven false, and the claims that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower have been proven 100% true.
The reason Comey brought up the Hillary stuff right before the election was because the email scandal narrative was growing out of control with pressure on the FBI to investigate. So, Comey went public with a sham investigation to exonerate her right before the election, believing such would help put that narrative to rest. Obviously, it didn’t, and Trump still won.
By keeping all of this under wraps, Comey could tell Trump he wasn’t under investigation (because said investigation was through counter-intelligence), the investigation materials could not be made public through Freedom of Information Act Requests, and when Trump fired Comey, the fact that the secret investigation was ongoing (to justify the FISA spying) could then be used to run the “Obstruction of Justice” narrative.
It was a complex web of conspiracy, but it had to be to keep the house of cards standing for so long. They really thought they could use this to either pressure Trump to resign, goad him into committing an impeachable offense, and/or swing the 2018/2020 elections against Trump. The conspiracy has now been proven true beyond a doubt, the Obstruction narrative proven false, the Russians hacked the election narrative proven false, and the claims that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower have been proven 100% true.
The reason Comey brought up the Hillary stuff right before the election was because the email scandal narrative was growing out of control with pressure on the FBI to investigate. So, Comey went public with a sham investigation to exonerate her right before the election, believing such would help put that narrative to rest. Obviously, it didn’t, and Trump still won.
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:48 pm to nerd guy
Mclovin
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:51 pm to DarthRebel
quote:If the red pill is an antipsychotic, I agree, you should take it.
Some of you really need to take red pill and see how deep the rabbit hole is
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:54 pm to lsucoonass
What the frick is Q?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:00 pm to lsucoonass
quote:
Mclovin
Shut up Stiffler
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:00 pm to kingbob
Wow, that was an interesting read.
Couple of things:
1. The conspiracy has not been proven true beyond a doubt;
2. The obstruction narrative has not been proven false;
3. The Russians did try and interfere in our elections;
4. Obama himself did not wiretap Trump tower.
Couple of things:
1. The conspiracy has not been proven true beyond a doubt;
2. The obstruction narrative has not been proven false;
3. The Russians did try and interfere in our elections;
4. Obama himself did not wiretap Trump tower.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:01 pm to kingbob
quote:
swing the 2018/2020 elections against Trump.
Seems mighty complex to go through all that when they could have just leaked to the public that there was an investigation open into contacts people on his campaign had with known Russian agents.
But what do I know.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:01 pm to NPComb
Do I know you?
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News