- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:11 am to Salmon
quote:
This will definitely calm people that think they are being ignored or disenfranchised.
Good job Twitter/Facebook.
Self awareness is dead.
They aren't stupid, they know what they're doing
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:11 am to DVinBR
quote:
first amendment
Does not apply to facebook.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:11 am to Salmon
They don’t care. What they want is a reaction, and they know if they can get one during the Biden administration, this type of censorship against dissenting voices will become permanent.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:11 am to hikingfan
Banning the leader of the free world, what a time.
I've banned myself from F***book since the beginning.
I've banned myself from F***book since the beginning.
This post was edited on 1/7/21 at 10:12 am
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:12 am to hikingfan
And the I FBed no more.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:12 am to hikingfan
Democrats love censorship almost as much as they like banning guns, religion, and (as of late) social interaction.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:13 am to Lawyered
quote:
Free speech isn’t so free apparently .
quote:
Lawyered
name checks out...
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:14 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
They aren't stupid, they know what they're doing
It's like when they inundate every aspect of your life with how evil white men are and then when someone finally says they've had enough, they respond with "Oh yeah, white men have it so bad"
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:14 am to Salmon
quote:
This will definitely calm people that think they are being ignored or disenfranchised.
Yeah no kidding. The millions of Americans that were already distrustful of big tech and the political system are vindicated.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:15 am to DVinBR
quote:
first amendment
Albuquerque
Potato chip
Fish
...also things that don't apply to this situation.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:15 am to LSUBoo
quote:
quote:
first amendment
Does not apply to republicans.
FIFY
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:16 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Albuquerque
Potato chip
Fish
...also things that don't apply to this situation.
To be fair, 1A doesn't apply because these social media companies are the recipient of ridiculous government protection
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:18 am to hikingfan
quote:
Facebook bans Trump indefinitely from the platform
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
I figure Twitter will follow suit in the next day or two, to the adoration of progressives nation wide.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:19 am to upgrayedd
quote:
1A doesn't apply because these social media companies are the recipient of ridiculous government protection
remove those Section 230 protections and you can kiss all user content sites like TD goodbye
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:20 am to Centinel
quote:
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
I figure Twitter will follow suit in the next day or two, to the adoration of progressives nation wide.
The interesting thing to watch will be how many companies drop or refuse to do business with him after he's a civilian again.
You know the media is going to do everything they can to keep Trump in the news. Without him, they'll essentially go out of business.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:21 am to Salmon
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/7/21 at 10:26 am
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:21 am to Salmon
quote:
remove those Section 230 protections and you can kiss all user content sites like TD goodbye
You don't have to remove them entirely, just no longer let Twitter/Facebook operate under them because of how they choose to operate.
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:23 am to Salmon
quote:
remove those Section 230 protections and you can kiss all user content sites like TD goodbye
Does it really have to be all or nothing?
Why can't you make the case for specific websites to be covered or not?
Posted on 1/7/21 at 10:24 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You don't have to remove them entirely, just no longer let Twitter/Facebook operate under them because of how they choose to operate.
the Section 230 protections give Twitter/Facebook the right to operate the way they do
Page 2 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News