Started By
Message

F-150 2.7 EcoBoost

Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:44 am
Posted by Ambassador
West Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2004
1352 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:44 am
I am looking at buying my son a truck. He is looking at a 2015 XLT Sport with a 2.7 EcoBoost. Anyone have experience with that truck/engine?

TIA.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120257 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:45 am to
Is it a 4x4?

He will get ripped on if it isnt
Posted by gobuxgo5
Member since Nov 2012
10026 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:45 am to
2.7? Dear Lord
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39783 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:47 am to
Get a Toyota
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:48 am to
quote:

2.7 Eco
thing is a beast tbh. Like it better than the 3.5 eco
Posted by VolsOut4Harambe
Atlanta, GA
Member since Sep 2017
12856 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:51 am to
quote:

2.7 EcoBoost




Get the V8. A small turbo V6 like that has no place in an F150.

The wear on that engine by forcing that much air into it to power >4500 lbs of truck is immense.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48475 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:51 am to
I've had a 2017 with the 2.7 for several years. It's been a solid engine and is a lot more peppy than you'd think. Sounds like a sewing machine though.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120257 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Get the V8. A small turbo V6 like that has no place in an F150.



OK boomer

Modern turbocharged engines are not your grandpappys turbocharged engine
Posted by Rooskie
MN
Member since Oct 2019
643 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:01 pm to
2.7 ecoboost is fine for hauling groceries, garbage and girls.
Posted by VolsOut4Harambe
Atlanta, GA
Member since Sep 2017
12856 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

OK boomer



I was born in the 90's baw
Posted by Ambassador
West Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2004
1352 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

He will get ripped on if it isnt


As in his friends will make fun of him if it is not a 4X4?

He is also looking at a 2017 Dodge Hemi 4X4 with the Lone Star package. It is something like 24 inch wheels and a lift package. It rides like a stinking buckboard.

The power with the twin turbos did surprise me with the amount of pep it had and it gets 22 MPG.
Posted by Ambassador
West Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2004
1352 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

2.7 ecoboost is fine for hauling groceries, garbage and girls.


That's basically what he will be doing and taking it deer hunting but no 4X4 needed where we go.

I have the Chevy 3500 if we need to haul things.
Posted by Them
People's Republic of Bozeman
Member since Nov 2008
11128 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:07 pm to
I sell used vehicles for a living, in Montana, where we see thousands of trucks traded in a year.

We get a LOT of EcoBoost F150s traded in with between 90k and 110k miles. They do not age well and have lots of pricey issues as the miles increase. Oil lines to the turbos, turbos themselves, timing chains, head gaskets are all weak points. We wholesale a large portion of the over-100k EcoBoosts we get on trade, because a lot of them are too fricked up to be worth keeping.

Granted, these are all things that apply to the 3.5L specifically. Maybe the 2.7L is better. I have no experience with those.

Bottom line is, I see hundreds of used EcoBoost F150s a year, and based on my experience, I wouldn’t buy one with more than 50k miles.
Posted by Ambassador
West Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2004
1352 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:09 pm to
Also, they are asking around NADA clean retail but have had the truck for over 90 days. It has been a long time since I bought a used vehicle and I used to use loan value as a guide to how much to offer.

Any thoughts to how much negotiating room they may have?
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

thing is a beast tbh. Like it better than the 3.5 eco


unless you tow anything.
Posted by StonewallJack
Member since Apr 2008
685 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:14 pm to
Do not buy the ecoboost or anything with eco in the name.

Get the V8
Posted by GEAUXT
Member since Nov 2007
29237 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:16 pm to
Make sure it's a crew cab so there's plenty of room in the backseat for all the gay sex that happens in trucks with a 2.7 liter engine
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48475 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

unless you tow anything.

the 2.7 would satisfy the needs of probably 95% of truck drivers. It has 325 hp, 400 ft torque and can tow something like 9000 lbs.
This post was edited on 12/30/19 at 12:17 pm
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:


the 2.7 would satisfy the needs of probably 95% of truck drivers. It has 325 hp, 400 ft torque and can tow something like 9000 lbs


yes it does, but my gas mileage would slip to 10-12 mpg anytime I hooked up a trailer.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38750 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

2015 XLT Sport with a 2.7 EcoBoost

the engine itself is great and mine towed better than my old 2500. everything else (TRANSMISSION) was crap and i literally fled the scene after i traded it in before they changed their mind at the dealership
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram