Started By
Message

re: Escaping Poverty Requires Almost 20 Years With Nearly Nothing Going Wrong

Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:59 pm to
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Escaping Poverty is More Likely When Two Sober, Attentive, Biological Parents are Raising Children Together


Fixed it for them.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96242 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:03 pm to
Not true. The rules are very simple and don't require much at all, except to follow them strictly - like a recipe:

1. Stay in school and earn a HS diploma

2. Don't have children unless you're married (and if you get married stay married)

3. Work at ANY KIND of job

4. Refrain from engaging in criminal activity

Chances are 1 in 20 you'll be poor and that doesn't take 20 years.

Boom.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96242 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Many cities, which house a disproportionate portion of the black (and increasingly, Latino) population, lack adequate funding for schools.


Another fallacy - nobody spends more on public school students than D.C. - more than folks spend of their own money in private schools in many places out in flyover country.

AND - the results are quite underwhelming. Education is largely a choice by the child and his parents. I'm 100% the product of public education, was raised by lower middle class parents without a formal education beyond high school, and I have a top 5% income.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 9:13 pm
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11842 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:14 pm to
I did it. By nothing it means nothing major like dropping out of school or a felony or get addicted to drugs or have a kid out of wedlock at a young age.

It is highly possible.
Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4811 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:38 pm to
This post was edited on 11/8/20 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
21286 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:44 pm to
I see things a lot differently than most.

Poverty is relative, even within your geographical are.

I know lots people that are under the poverty line but they work hard, live efficiently, are clean and proud of what they have and generally seem happier than most OT ballers I know. I dont think any of them would admit to being poor or poverty stricken.

Poverty is a frame of mind.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:49 pm to
Graduate from high school. Get a job and be reliable at it. Don't have a baby before marriage. Don't go into debt to buy items that rapidly depreciate (other than a modest vehicle). That's all you have to do to succeed in the most prosperous nation in world history. You find me an American adult who claims to be in poverty and I will find you one or all of those things that they did not follow. It's a cultural problem that government can't fix with any economic solution.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 9:56 pm
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:24 pm to
He's not exactly breaking new ground here. Everything he is saying has been obvious to anyone with eyes for at least the last few decades, if not the entire history of man. After a brief flirtation (in the mid-20th century, roughly 1930s-1970s) with a more egalitarian approach, the masses have been reconditioned to accept the ancient status quo through a combination of propaganda, intimidation, religion and all the methods he describes.

Of course it's infuriating or saddening to anyone who bothers to pay attention and has an ounce of "human" decency (a concept we fantasize about, but evidently doesn't exist), but as long as most people are stupid and enough people have no empathy or compassion, it will continue. It seems that no matter how much we fancy ourselves intelligent, rational or somehow different, we can never improve our inherent nature above the common animals we came from, with our animalistic predation and battles for heirarchical dominance merely taking different forms rather than becoming obsolete.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 10:34 pm
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8719 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

I did it. By nothing it means nothing major like dropping out of school or a felony or get addicted to drugs or have a kid out of wedlock at a young age.

It is highly possible.


The formula really isn't that difficult, and I tend to be pretty sympathetic to some poverty-focused issues:

1) Graduate from high school

2) Don't have children until you're 21

3) Don't commit a serious misdemeanor or any felony

4) Don't become hooked on narcotics or an alcoholic

Do those four things, and your life, while having its struggles like everyone else, will not be that bad.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

the masses have been reconditioned to accept the ancient status quo through a combination of propaganda, intimidation, religion and all the methods he describes.



What ancient status quo is this?

Escaping poverty is simple unless you have a cognitive or physical condition that prevents you from being productive.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8719 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

He's not exactly breaking new ground here. Everything he is saying has been obvious to anyone with eyes for at least the last few decades, if not the entire history of man. After a brief flirtation (in the mid-20th century, roughly 1930s-1970s) with a more egalitarian approach, the masses have been reconditioned to accept the ancient status quo through a combination of propaganda, intimidation, religion and all the methods he describes.

Of course it's infuriating (or saddening, depending on what group you're in) to anyone who bothers to pay attention and has an ounce of human decency, but as long as most people are stupid and enough people have no humanity in their souls (that is to say, forever) it will continue.


You do realize that poverty in the U.S. has stayed pretty consistent since the 1970's (and that poverty was much higher in the range you cited)?

Cultural degradation has far, far, far more to do with increased social immobility than anything else, and I say that as someone who is pretty socially liberal all things considered.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

What ancient status quo is this?


A small number of people who control the power and wealth of the society and a large majority subjugated and controlled by that small number.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:36 pm to



Yeah, his statement was weird.

Looks like it pretty much dropped starting in the late 40's and settled to it's present point (between 10-15%) in the mid 60's.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

You do realize that poverty in the U.S. has stayed pretty consistent since the 1970's (and that poverty was much higher in the range you cited)?


Yes, the extreme disparities were exposed during the depression and two unprecedented bloody world wars which served as a sort of equalizing influence emotionally as people of most almost every class other than the super rich were more or less equal in the breadlines, on the battlefields and in body bags. This is what brought about the attempts to remedy them. Far short of actually succeeding, the effort was abandoned around the end of the 1970s when the elite class was able to co-opt the previously apolitical or anti-establishment evangelical protestant contingent into the effort to re-establish the same old economic and political power heirarchy.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36821 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:44 pm to
Or they could just...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:44 pm to
quote:



Yes, the extreme disparities were exposed during the depression and two unprecedented bloody world wars which served as a sort of equalizing influence emotionally as all classes other than the super rich were more or less equal on the battlefield and in a body bag. This is what brought about the attempts to remedy them. Far short of actually succeeding, the effort was abandoned around the end of the 1970s when the elite class was able to co-opt the previously apolitical or anti-establishment evangelical protestant contingent into the effort to re-establish the same old economic and political power heirarchy.
Some pretty serious delusion. You're trying to interpret the world as you see it through some very tinted ideological glasses.

Looks to me government action has created a permanent underclass. If you want to help people escape poverty, you need to fix the mechanisms that hold 10-15% in poverty, which may be too late.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 10:48 pm
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

Escaping poverty is simple unless you have a cognitive or physical condition that prevents you from being productive.




Ridiculous. But many people still believe it. It's a testament to the power of propaganda.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

Looks like it pretty much dropped starting in the late 40's and settled to it's present point (between 10-15%) in the mid 60's.


Yes, it started coming down around 1950 after both world wars and the depression, quickly plummeted and then around the end of the 1970s leveled off and has continued mostly level and inching upward since. The upward trend will continue until it gets back to where it was. And frankly, where it has pretty much always been throughout the history of civilization.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8719 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:51 pm to
quote:


Yes, the extreme disparities were exposed during the depression and two unprecedented bloody world wars which served as a sort of equalizing influence emotionally as people of most almost every class other than the super rich were more or less equal in the breadlines, on the battlefields and in body bags. This is what brought about the attempts to remedy them. Far short of actually succeeding, the effort was abandoned around the end of the 1970s when the elite class was able to co-opt the previously apolitical or anti-establishment evangelical protestant contingent into the effort to re-establish the same old economic and political power heirarchy.


That sounds like a whole lot of anecdotes without any data.

The flip side to that story is that the massive expansion in the welfare state in the 1960's has created a screwed up incentive structure in which people in poverty have little incentive to actually create value. And I can point to the Great Society as the time and place in which that inflection point actually happened.

That's not even getting into the exponential leaps in information technology, globalization, and so forth which were inevitable with or without any sort of policy remedy.

Keep on hacking away at it, though, Comrade Sanders. I am sure some 19th or early 20th century ideology and methodology will work swimmingly.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 10:54 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 10:55 pm to
quote:


Yes, it started coming down around 1950 after both world wars and the depression, quickly plummeted and then around the end of the 1970s leveled off and has continued mostly level and inching upward since. The upward trend will continue until it gets back to where it was. And frankly, where it has pretty much always been throughout the history of civilization.


10-15% is never going to change. It will always be in that range regardless of government policy.

It hasn't been "inching up ever since." In fact it's fluctuated up and down between those two numbers since the mid 60's. It was as high in 1993 as it is now.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram