Started By
Message

re: Door Dash girl is a perfect example of female privilege and lack of accountability

Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by johnqpublic
Right here
Member since Oct 2017
804 posts
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

On the other hand, this woman will likely face little or no criminal charges and most likely won't face any real civil penalties either which will only further emboldened vindictive feminists to weaponize this kind of crap on other men


She.."now faces two felony charges — one count of unlawful surveillance in the second degree, and one count of dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image in the first degree... If found guilty, she faces up to eight years in prison."
Posted by HarryHoudini
Member since Oct 2025
319 posts
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
6388 posts
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

If found guilty, she faces up to eight years in prison.

I remember when this story came out and I watched one of her videos. Man, she comes off as such an entitled little shite and she was basically trying (way to hard) to play the victim so she could get more clicks and likes. It was all for social media attention and hopes of "going viral". I'm glad to see her being charged. I doubt she does any actual prison time, especially if this is her first offense, but this is still good news to see that she is being prosecuted.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
32070 posts
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:14 pm to
I found the Door Dash girl's father...

Posted by Crowley Cajun
Member since Sep 2004
452 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 7:13 am to
She has been arraigned. Don't be surprised if a female DA is the one to prosecute. And if I were the male customer, I'd hire a female attorney for the civil action. A funny sidenote, I watched one video where the woman narrator reported that the defense attorney requested that no video or cameras allowed in the courtroom. She reported that the judge looked at him and said, "Now you don't want video cameras allowed?" He was denied lol. This girl could face up to 8 years in prison and $10,000 in fines. And if it's proven that she profited from the video because she makes money on some of her content, the fines could double.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24965 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 8:37 am to
I am in my 50s and never passed out naked.

The girl was in the wrong, but never make yourself an easy target.
Posted by Mlear
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
178 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 8:46 am to
bro you wrote this long rant after watching a 45 min brain rot youtube video about this. get off the internet. None of this effects you lol, go live your life.

What a loser.
This post was edited on 12/18/25 at 8:49 am
Posted by ronk
Member since Jan 2015
7533 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:34 am to
Tell your daughter not to video in someone's house.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18917 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

And if it's proven that she profited from the video because she makes money on some of her content, the fines could double.



Think TikTok pulled her videos so she won't get paid for those views.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18917 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

The girl was in the wrong, but never make yourself an easy target.


She opened his closed door. If she wasn't a feckless count then he would have been just fine.
Posted by Lanelsu83
Member since Dec 2025
80 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Think TikTok pulled her videos so she won't get paid for those views


Tik tok pays people to post naked videos of random strangers sleeping?

What the frick is going on in society?
Posted by jflsufan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2013
5010 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Criminal statutes are different everywhere, but most video voyeurism statutes have an element of there being a reasonable expectation of privacy. For example, if you’re naked on your front lawn and someone records you, that’s not video voyeurism. If you’re naked in your bedroom, someone jumps the fence and records you through the window, that’s video voyeurism. If you’re naked inside your home, but visible from the front door, which you not only actively invite people to, but general societal expectations state people can approach whenever they’d like, it creates a bit of a gray area that could be reasonably interpreted either way, in my opinion.


Would the plain view doctrine apply here?
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
31660 posts
Posted on 12/18/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Would the plain view doctrine apply here?

That applies specifically to exceptions to the Fourth Amendment, but the underlying concept is the same. If I can stand somewhere I'm allowed to be and see something without using any special equipment, then it's hard for someone to argue that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy for anything I could see.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram