- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Door Dash girl is a perfect example of female privilege and lack of accountability
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:06 pm to Govt Tide
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:06 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
On the other hand, this woman will likely face little or no criminal charges and most likely won't face any real civil penalties either which will only further emboldened vindictive feminists to weaponize this kind of crap on other men
She.."now faces two felony charges — one count of unlawful surveillance in the second degree, and one count of dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image in the first degree... If found guilty, she faces up to eight years in prison."
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:32 pm to johnqpublic
quote:
If found guilty, she faces up to eight years in prison.
I remember when this story came out and I watched one of her videos. Man, she comes off as such an entitled little shite and she was basically trying (way to hard) to play the victim so she could get more clicks and likes. It was all for social media attention and hopes of "going viral". I'm glad to see her being charged. I doubt she does any actual prison time, especially if this is her first offense, but this is still good news to see that she is being prosecuted.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:14 pm to Govt Tide
I found the Door Dash girl's father...
Posted on 12/18/25 at 7:13 am to Govt Tide
She has been arraigned. Don't be surprised if a female DA is the one to prosecute. And if I were the male customer, I'd hire a female attorney for the civil action. A funny sidenote, I watched one video where the woman narrator reported that the defense attorney requested that no video or cameras allowed in the courtroom. She reported that the judge looked at him and said, "Now you don't want video cameras allowed?" He was denied lol. This girl could face up to 8 years in prison and $10,000 in fines. And if it's proven that she profited from the video because she makes money on some of her content, the fines could double.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 8:37 am to Govt Tide
I am in my 50s and never passed out naked.
The girl was in the wrong, but never make yourself an easy target.
The girl was in the wrong, but never make yourself an easy target.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 8:46 am to Govt Tide
bro you wrote this long rant after watching a 45 min brain rot youtube video about this. get off the internet. None of this effects you lol, go live your life.
What a loser.
What a loser.
This post was edited on 12/18/25 at 8:49 am
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:34 am to Mlear
Tell your daughter not to video in someone's house.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:48 am to Crowley Cajun
quote:
And if it's proven that she profited from the video because she makes money on some of her content, the fines could double.
Think TikTok pulled her videos so she won't get paid for those views.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:50 am to DarthRebel
quote:
The girl was in the wrong, but never make yourself an easy target.
She opened his closed door. If she wasn't a feckless count then he would have been just fine.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:58 am to Clames
quote:
Think TikTok pulled her videos so she won't get paid for those views
Tik tok pays people to post naked videos of random strangers sleeping?
What the frick is going on in society?
Posted on 12/18/25 at 11:34 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Criminal statutes are different everywhere, but most video voyeurism statutes have an element of there being a reasonable expectation of privacy. For example, if you’re naked on your front lawn and someone records you, that’s not video voyeurism. If you’re naked in your bedroom, someone jumps the fence and records you through the window, that’s video voyeurism. If you’re naked inside your home, but visible from the front door, which you not only actively invite people to, but general societal expectations state people can approach whenever they’d like, it creates a bit of a gray area that could be reasonably interpreted either way, in my opinion.
Would the plain view doctrine apply here?
Posted on 12/18/25 at 11:41 am to jflsufan
quote:
Would the plain view doctrine apply here?
That applies specifically to exceptions to the Fourth Amendment, but the underlying concept is the same. If I can stand somewhere I'm allowed to be and see something without using any special equipment, then it's hard for someone to argue that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy for anything I could see.
Popular
Back to top

2









