Started By
Message

re: Do you think the moon landings were real?

Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:21 pm to
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68381 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:21 pm to
This is for all the fools who think the landings were fake. Do a little research.


Proof



1.The Waving Flag

According to this argument, frequently cited by the people who think that the moon landings were nothing more but a hoax, is that the star-spangled banner of the United States of America seemed to wave and flutter as Neil Armstrong planted it to the ground. This wouldn’t have been much of an issue except for the fact that there is virtually no atmosphere on the moon, and therefore no wind whatsoever to have such an effect on any flag.

File:Buzz salutes the U.S. Flag.jpg
Buzz Aldrin salutes the U.S. Flag(Apollo 11, 1969)

However, if we look closely on the original moon landing footage, we can see that the flag is actually standing still, and not moving in any way during the entire tape. But why is the flag still?

To make the flag stand still on the moon, the flag was actually made from plastic material, similar to the one that tents are usually made of .

For practical reasons, the flag was originally folded to maximize space and stored in a thin tube.

After Neil Armstrong planted it to the surface of the Moon, it briefly appeared to move as it was unfolding itself to its final shape.
Posted by DanW1
Member since Jan 2013
1126 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:21 pm to
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68381 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:23 pm to
OJ's full of shite.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216679 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:23 pm to
I believe they were real. But I have never understood that if Neil was the 1st to set foot on the moon how come there is a picture from like 20 feet away showing him go down the ladder????
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:26 pm to
I think they re-did the shot much like Iwo.
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68381 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:27 pm to
Because Buzz had already left the lander and Buzz took the pic.

You couldn't noodle that through your big brain?

ETA: It wasn't when Neil first set foot on the moon. Come on guys.
This post was edited on 4/10/16 at 11:29 pm
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
11182 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:38 pm to
quote:


But what I don't understand is why we haven't been back. It seems like it would be much easier with the advances in technology.




That's a lot of moon landings. What's the point on repetitive returns? The risk far outweighs the reward, not to mention the gigantic costs.

Someone has to pay for this shite. There's nothing worth investing in if the goal is the moon.
This post was edited on 4/10/16 at 11:41 pm
Posted by Beaver Bandit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2015
906 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:42 pm to
I can't find it right now but I've read before that some of the footage that was shot on the moon was ruined somehow, so they did some reshoots in a studio. I can buy that because we did go to the moon and it explains some of the abnormalities with some of the footage.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216679 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:46 pm to
Ok. I guess I never thought of that. I always wanted to go to the moon. IMO we should have landed on Mars by now. BUT is going farther into space THAT important???? They spend a dhitload of money on it.
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37909 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:47 pm to
We have landed on Mars?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216679 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:49 pm to
What kind of wuedtion is that???
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68381 posts
Posted on 4/10/16 at 11:52 pm to
Of course, we have 3 bases there and they're growing marijuana and synthesising LSD.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 12:18 am to
quote:

it explains some of the abnormalities with some of the footage.


i call b. s.

Posted by Beaver Bandit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2015
906 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 12:35 am to
quote:

i call b. s.
It's just a theory. I believe all the footage is real and nothing was faked about landing on the moon. Most of the nay sayers point to the footage for their argument on why they think the entire event was faked. All I'm saying is that a reshoot seems like a more plausible explanation if in fact anything is wrong with the footage.
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 12:36 am to
If we don't have the technology to land on the moon, then we certainly don't have the technology to orbit a satellite continuously around the planet in order to provide the internet service that would power this website.


So who the frick are all you imposters then?

Have to admit, you had me fooled for a second there.
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 12:50 am to
quote:

5 pages.



Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83542 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 12:51 am to
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:12 am to
quote:

I believe they were real. But I have never understood that if Neil was the 1st to set foot on the moon how come there is a picture from like 20 feet away showing him go down the ladder????


The video of Armstrong taking the first step on the moon was from a camera mounted to the leg of the lunar lander.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 1:29 am to

There is a ton of third party evidence that we were on the moon.

LINK

A friend of my Dad was Richard Krandle, he is mentioned in the Wiki article for Apollo 15. He was a engineer living in New Jersey during the Apollo program. He did not work in the space program but was very interested in it, working by himself he fabricated a microwave receiver for the frequency used by the lunar module to command module communications link, he also built a large parabolic dish in his back yard. Using his home built equipment and antenna he was able to receive the astronauts communications directly from the moon. He sent reel to reel tapes of the communications to my dad which I also heard. The non-believers will probably say that NASA obviously went to the trouble of relaying communications signals to the moon and back just in case some random engineer might try to build his own equipment to intercept the signals.

This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 1:34 am
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 2:24 am to
Anyone that doesn't believe it is a complete idiot right along with all the rest of the truthers and birthers
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram