- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you think Great Apes could eventually evolve enough to have their own Stone Age?
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:41 pm to yakster
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:41 pm to yakster
quote:
Well apparently you don’t know much about the Bible then. Over 300 prophetic happenings have been fulfilled already and you say there is no proof?
1
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:43 pm to yakster
quote:
Over 300 prophetic happenings have been fulfilled already and you say there is no proof?
Ballpark, how many left?
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:43 pm to deltadummy
The rebuttal of a man that doesn’t have one. Congrats
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:45 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
That’s great, but none of that necessarily confirms he accuracy or veracity of things in the Bible.
Because you can’t read. It confirms most of the Old Testament
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:46 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Because you can’t read. It confirms most of the New Testament
I can read just fine. How does it confirm most of the New Testament?
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:48 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
The rebuttal of a man that doesn’t have one. Congrats
Shouldn’t someone claiming that over 300 prophesies in the Bible have been fulfilled be the one with the burden of proof? What exactly is there to rebut there?
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:53 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I can read just fine. How does it confirm most of the New Testament?
Go do your research on it. What I posted is just a snippet
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:55 pm to Howyouluhdat
You posted random statement with no citation. Of course it doesn’t occur to you that I’m being rhetorical. I have researched the Dead Sea scrolls, and while they’re very interesting, they don’t confirm the veracity of the Bible like you seem to believe they do.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:16 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I have researched the Dead Sea scrolls, and while they’re very interesting, they don’t confirm the veracity of the Bible like you seem to believe they do.
Doesn’t seem like you researched it very well. It confirms Luke 3:15 & John 1:41. Teachings of John the Baptist, Jesus, Revelations, & Matthew 24.
quote:
A Qumran text known as 4Q246 (The Aramaic Apocalypse) refers to a coming figure as: “He will be called the Son of God… and they will call him the Son of the Most High.” • This is strikingly similar to Luke 1:32–35 (announcement of Jesus’ birth), showing that such titles existed in Jewish thought before the New Testament.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:21 pm to SPAGHETTI PLATE
We need to bomb them now so they don’t figure out how to make a nuke, just in case
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:28 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Doesn’t seem like you researched it very well. It confirms Luke 3:15 & John 1:41. Teachings of John the Baptist, Jesus, Revelations, & Matthew 24.
Your definition of “confirm” must be different than mine. And it’s “Revelation” without the “s”.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:31 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Your definition of “confirm” must be different than mine.
It must be
quote:
And it’s “Revelation” without the “s”.
Cool. Dispute what I said then
Posted on 6/22/25 at 2:46 pm to Howyouluhdat
Your point is just kind of dumb. You’re pointing to source “A” that references thing “x”. Thing “x” also happens to be referenced in source “B”. That doesn’t make thing “x” true. I can find the same fairy tale in two separate books. One book doesn’t prove that the fairy tale in the other book is true.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 2:51 pm to SPAGHETTI PLATE
The Bonobos would be too busy groping and screwing each other regardless of sex or age while letting the women lead them.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 3:23 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Your point is just kind of dumb. You’re pointing to source “A” that references thing “x”. Thing “x” also happens to be referenced in source “B”. That doesn’t make thing “x” true. I can find the same fairy tale in two separate books. One book doesn’t prove that the fairy tale in the other book is true.
So you think ancient text that people wrote were just for the hell of it? You think they made it up. I don’t understand your argument. Why believe anything in this life unless you see it with your own eyes? Do you believe the air that passes by you outside is wind?
30 authors and 66 books are all bullshite. You are a clown
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 6/22/25 at 3:55 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
So you think ancient text that people wrote were just for the hell of it? You think they made it u
Isn't that exactly what we humans do today? By this argument, everything humans ever wrote, was about real occurences.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 4:06 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Isn't that exactly what we humans do today?
Lie A lot? You might
Posted on 6/22/25 at 4:11 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Lie A lot? You might
Lie a lot?!?!
Do we or do we not write for no other reason than the hell of it? I mean there is the money aspect, but mostly it is done for pure love and entertainment.
I wish I could come back 2000 years from now and hear some little dude argue that since there were 1000's of texts by hundreds of authors and dozens of movies by many different directors, Marvel had to be true because they sure wouldn't have done it for the hell of it.
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 6/22/25 at 4:17 pm to UtahCajun
JFC you guys have fricked this thread up
Posted on 6/22/25 at 4:27 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
I'm absolutely shocked that you of all people look at a clip meant to parody creationism and believe it to be a terrific example of why creationism is real
I am amazed that anybody mixes science and faith in discussions.
For example, if there is an omnipotent God, he would have created all the "evidence" for evolution. He could have made it all up as a joke. You can't use "science" to argue against "faith". It is like 2 tribes with different languages and no translations.
Page 4 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News