- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Divorce attorneys, with the ruling yesterday on gay marriage, be like....
Posted on 6/27/15 at 12:46 pm to bmy
Posted on 6/27/15 at 12:46 pm to bmy
quote:
by bmy
highly doubt that most gay marriages will be open
Based on what?
I'm on my phone, and the latest iOS blows, so I can't get the quote function to work properly, but the below is from a weekly standard article from June 22nd.
Here’s gay activist Jay Michaelson last year in the Daily Beast:
[T]here is some truth to the conservative claim that gay marriage is changing, not just expanding, marriage. According to a 2013 study, about half of gay marriages surveyed (admittedly, the study was conducted in San Francisco) were not strictly monogamous.
This fact is well-known in the gay community—indeed, we assume it’s more like three-quarters. But it’s been fascinating to see how my straight friends react to it. Some feel they’ve been duped: They were fighting for marriage equality, not marriage redefinition.
Posted on 6/27/15 at 12:51 pm to mauser
quote:
There's a lesbian joke that goes something like, "How do you know two lesbians are on their 2nd date? One shows up at the other one's pad with a U-Haul in tow."
..that is closer to the truth than you think.
Posted on 6/27/15 at 12:55 pm to Proximo
I was thinking more in terms of claims for equitable relief since there was a legal barrier to what the parties intended, the pooling of assets for the purchase of a home together. Will there be some sort of effort to make economic substance the determining factor instead of the legal form of ownership?
Posted on 6/27/15 at 1:30 pm to LSUAlum2001
Yes another gay thread was needed.
Posted on 6/27/15 at 1:36 pm to tgrbaitn08
This is a money making thread...
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:25 pm to Thurber
Now that this is legal will states that have common law have to retro that? For example two gay dudes been together exclusively for 10 years then bust up. Can one of them go to court for some of the property.
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:34 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
know a bunch of lesbians who married (as legal as they could do it) and separated several times within 5 years.
Same here, my friends gay cousin said he dreaded legalization of gay marriage because he knows he'll end up losing half his shite at least a couple of times.
Personally, I'm screwed with all my slam pieces because I can't use the,"I'm not getting married till everybody can..", excuse anywhere
Thanks a lot, Supreme Court
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:37 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
This is a money making thread...
Exactly
This thread is about the exploitation of highly volatile gay couples and their extravagantly expensive lifestyle...
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:37 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
posted on the poli board that I would pay good money to watch divorce proceedings between two gay guys. I bet that shite gets vicious.
To be honest, I'd say for the most part it would be easier than a straight divorce. Unless they're flamers, the only thing 2 guys are really going to care about are the kids and the dog.
Lesbians on the other hand, holy frick. I'd love to be a fly on the wall with those proceedings.
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:53 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
To be honest, I'd say for the most part it would be easier than a straight divorce
Totally disagree, gay couples/people can be really malicious
Posted on 6/27/15 at 2:57 pm to WHATDOINO
I was talking about marriage rate, not divorce rate.
Popular
Back to top

0







