- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Disney's ABC is pulling Jimmy Kimmel indefinitely after Charlie Kirk comments (update)
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Who was fine with his murder
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:01 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Who was fine with his murder
No one, absolutely no one....

This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:02 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Who was fine with his murder
What rock have you been under the last week?
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Thought you were implying me since you replied to my comment.
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that. People pointing out what they perceive as ironic or saying they didn’t agree with him or pointing out the instant weaponization of his death isn’t the same thing as “celebrating his death”.
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that. People pointing out what they perceive as ironic or saying they didn’t agree with him or pointing out the instant weaponization of his death isn’t the same thing as “celebrating his death”.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:08 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that.
JFC.
Youre already embarrassing yourself, now this?
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:10 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that. People pointing out what they perceive as ironic or saying they didn’t agree with him or pointing out the instant weaponization of his death isn’t the same thing as “celebrating his death”.
Bruh
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that. People pointing out what they perceive as ironic or saying they didn’t agree with him or pointing out the instant weaponization of his death isn’t the same thing as “celebrating his death”.
Nice cope
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:17 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That said most of the “celebrating” isn’t even that. People pointing out what they perceive as ironic or saying they didn’t agree with him or pointing out the instant weaponization of his death isn’t the same thing as “celebrating his death”.
This is amazing.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:19 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Who was fine with his murder
Just today I saw Kieth Oblermann saying that Charlie Kirk can burn in hell.
But let me guess…..you don’t think that counts.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre already embarrassing yourself, now this?
But you can acknowledge the distinction b/t someone saying watch ya neck or frick his family vs someone being critial of Kirk's words right? Folks who's only knowledge of Kirk is misquotes and clipped takes that when taken out of context are quite spicey and may give the impression he is a racist. Folks captured by their algorithm into believing bad data are not the same as those celebrating murder imo.
This is the sort of person Im referring to:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. He isnt celebrating Kirk's death but he is just as worthy of ridicule and shaming and possible job loss as those that are.celebrating ..at least Lib of Tik think so. and I've seen examples of this all over the place.
This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 9/18/25 at 4:46 pm to ThuperThumpin
That cop is 100% breaking the rules of his employment making posts like that assuming his state has similar rules as Louisiana. Play stupid games, maybe lose your job. Oh well
Kinda strange to downvote a simple fact, but you do you whoever you are
Kinda strange to downvote a simple fact, but you do you whoever you are
This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 9/18/25 at 4:52 pm to LNCHBOX
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
How Jimmy Kimmel’s Suspension Went Down: Sponsor Panic, a Defiant Host and a Painful Call
Disney’s Bob Iger and Dana Walden wanted to know how Kimmel was going to address the situation. Sources say he planned to defend what he said rather than "kowtowing” to the outrage. Disney thought that would fan the flames.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 5:00 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Disney’s Bob Iger and Dana Walden wanted to know how Kimmel was going to address the situation. Sources say he planned to defend what he said rather than "kowtowing” to the outrage. Disney thought that would fan the flames.
Dude lives in the most echo'iest of echo chambers. No shock he couldn't read the room and right he'd be able to do that.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 5:18 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Kinda strange to downvote a simple fact, but you do you whoever you are
That wasn't me...dv btw......but as a governemnt employee yea you have a point...it was stupid.....do.you thnk what the said was shameful?
Posted on 9/18/25 at 5:22 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
That wasn't me...dv btw.....
Didn't think it was
quote:
do.you thnk what the said was shameful?
I find it to be more ignorant than anything. You have to be severely misinformed to claim CK was racist. And as you said, posting something like that for the world to see is pretty stupid in general.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 5:48 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 9/19/25 at 7:48 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That cop is 100% breaking the rules of his employment making posts like that assuming his state has similar rules as Louisiana.
What rule would that be
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:05 am to LNCHBOX
I’m definitely reporting some of y’all to the government for oversight. Way too much free thinking going on in here.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:21 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
What rule would that be
In LA civil servants cannot engage in politics on social media. You also must be professional, which means no defamatory remarks (claiming CK is openly racist for example) and no creating a hostile work environment. This one post alone obviously wouldn't be enough to claim hostile work environment, but I'm betting a deeper dive into this guy's social media would provide some more.
Is this one post enough to be fired, highly doubtful and I wouldn't like that. Is it something that can be reported and he face discipline for? 100%. Making posts like that, and even if it were in staunch defense of CK, when you work for the public is just not smart.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:21 am to DavidTheGnome
Popular
Back to top



3




