- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:22 pm to guttata
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:22 pm to guttata
For an unlimited license to practice medicine and surgery? I would say no since that has likely not been what an Np has been doing in this state so it wouldn't fully correlate
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:23 pm to LATigerdoc
GPA is your only stat?
Do you commute to Alexandria from Oakdale or is Oakdale just your home town?
Do you commute to Alexandria from Oakdale or is Oakdale just your home town?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:24 pm to Steve Lurkel
We got mcat scores and act scores and step scores and maybe SAT and then board scores and also med school gpa
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:27 pm to LATigerdoc
Well piss them out already or did you run out of flomax?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:30 pm to guttata
quote:
My wife has been in practice 13 yrs. I guess that comes out to at least 22,000 clinical hours. Would that be enough? By the way, she has no desire to open her own clinic.
Flying Cessna's for 13 years doesn't qualify one to fly a 777.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:32 pm to Steve Lurkel
You can check with LC and chrisrx but I work down at the pizza pit in oakdale. On the weekends I model in Malibu
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:34 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
For an unlimited license to practice medicine and surgery?
We can't perform surgery now anyways. Again, this is not changing our scope of practice.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:35 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Because they don't want anyone taking their market share? It isn't "fair" that someone who doesn't have their extensive training can take their patients. That's pretty much what this boils down to. Anyone who doesn't have a bias can see that.
I don't even practice in LA and never will. So, you want to try again?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:36 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
but sometimes people just have abscesses on their arse
Abscesses on their arse are a hell of a lot more serious than URI. They kill people not infrequently and lead to hospitalization often. They're also the source of chronic wounds in a big number of cases, something not even most physicians are trained to deal with- there's an entire field of wound care which sees these folks frequently because they're so difficult to manage.
This is an example of equating common things that you've heard of with being "simple" and "easy to manage." It's a lot more complex than you'd imagine, even what's seemingly simple and straightforward.
No one here argues NP's aren't capable of diagnosing and treating simple things. The argument is that what most people don't understand- simple complaints are frequently the result of complex problems. And for that reason, oversight of a mid-level provider should remain in place. That's why MD's who have graduated are no more than mid-levels at first. They can't treat patients without oversight until they've logged >3000 hours under supervision. And that's if they were grads of US/Canadian Med schools. The ones who are graduates of foreign medical schools, such as the schools down in the Carribbean are required to spend 3 full years in residency (about 5 times the requirement of the NPs in the bill) before the board will consider them eligible to see patients on their own without oversight. The LSBME is even considering doing away with those requirements and requiring everyone complete residency prior to being able to see patients alone.
And this seeing patients alone deal...that means that a guy born and raised in New Orleans who just didn't quite have grades for a US school and decided to go to the Carribbean for medical school instead of waiting a year and trying again, kills it, graduates, matches into a neurosurgery (pick whatever it is you think is the "smartest" field. It's really irrelevant) residency, completing 35 months of it and then getting in a car accident which makes him forced to leave residency for an extended period of time. That guy would not be allowed to hang a shingle and write you medicine for a cold without finding some way to complete another month of residency. But an NP who worked well under 25% of those hours with less schooling could. I find this to be a problem. I think the medical field should have one set of standards for the state, not multiple. The current system sets a bare minimum of ~3000 hours (an intern year) after medical school (which was itself about 3000 additional patient contact hours, or ~6x the number required in NP school) before allowing a qualified physician to practice without oversight- and the state board, and without influence from the legislation or anyone, is considering raising, not lowering that number. Further, as someone who is eligible for a license in another month, (and no attempt at bragging, but was a very average medical student and a very above average intern), I find it horrifying that I could leave and practice on my own in just 45 or so more days.
I think this bill creates unnecessary division in the name of delivering "cheaper" care. I think a better option is to recognize there is a shortage of primary care, add NP input to the state medical board, and come up with a plan for reducing the shortage by offering appropriately trained individuals who are under one, single set of standards from a governing society that knows about the field rather than an arbitrary piece of legislation that creates further division and a "tiered" approach that is designed to allow less-trained individuals the opportunity to practice without oversight earlier.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:37 pm to Scooby
I totally agree. Family practice MDs shouldn't be doing any specialty outside of their training.
This post was edited on 5/17/16 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:38 pm to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Why the hell are docs posting on tigerdroppings to defeat this bill? Do you really think this is an effective forum to get your dire worries to the public across?
Sadly yes, social media is one of if not the most effective means of communication in our backwards society.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 4:56 pm to guttata
Family practice medical doctors have a full license to practice medicine and surgery in Louisiana. They have clinical judgement, a conscious and reason which guide them in their own clinical decisions to limit their scope
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:00 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
They have clinical judgement, a conscious and reason
*and hospitals which don't allow privileges, as well as a state board who holds them to the standard of a board-certified physician in that field in the event something should go wrong.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:01 pm to LATigerdoc
quote:
They have clinical judgement, a conscious and reason which guide them in their own clinical decisions to limit their scope
As do competent NPs.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:02 pm to guttata
quote:
I totally agree. Family practice MDs shouldn't be doing any specialty outside of their training.
Sincere question:
What do you understand a Family Practice MD's scope of training to be?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:03 pm to Scooby
They lack the training which yields the clinical judgement as its end product
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:03 pm to Hopeful Doc
Knowing a little about a lot and a lot about a little.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:04 pm to Bleeding purple
BP, you still perform some surgical procedures correct?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:04 pm to Hopeful Doc
There's no scope of practice on an FP
Posted on 5/17/16 at 5:05 pm to guttata
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/17/16 at 5:11 pm
Popular
Back to top


1



