Started By
Message

re: Current, former LA officials spar over scuttled coastal project (Mid-Barataria Diversion)

Posted on 8/15/25 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27111 posts
Posted on 8/15/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

$2.5 billion in taxpayer money for dredging costs over 50 years


We just turned down $3 Billion from the BP settlement, that could now go to other states, for an erosion mitigation project because it might cost us $50 Million a year out of an annual $50 Billion budget to maintain it.

Oh…and because oyster fishermen may not be able to continue forming oysters where there actually used to be real dry land.

Come on, man. Don’t you realize how brilliant this move is?
Posted by lsuchip30
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2007
478 posts
Posted on 8/15/25 at 7:38 pm to
We were awarded our portion of the project in March of 2024
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
16987 posts
Posted on 8/15/25 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Then the Army Corps of Engineers pulled the permit

They pulled the permit because Landry and Dove begged them to.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33031 posts
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

I am sure you are some staffer or oyster lobby-associated, and that's fine

Starting with this, your entire post is wrong. Heres the quotes from the letter
quote:

"This suspension is based on the state's actions (including failures to act or to obtain compromise), its public statements and positions, the new information and potentially changed circumstances since permit issuance," Army Corps Col. Cullen Jones wrote in the latest letter, addressed to CPRA Chairman Gordon Dove.

The agency stated that during the permit evaluation, the Edwards administration withheld information it knew would be important for regulators to assess environmental impacts. The Corps also said the state failed to secure local flood insurance compliance

The Army Coprs singled out the Edwards admin. Quit shilling for those bozos
quote:

MVM asks the State to furnish the previously withheld June 3, 2022 FTN Modeling Report

Who was governor in 2022? The only thing in the ACoE letter that Landry was a part of was not guaranteeing the state funding for 50 years of dredging. And the benefit only SLIGHTLY outweighed the negative consequences of the diversion. And that diversion is a new science, and the withholding of the modeling report severely undermined their ability to properly assess. Its right there in the letter.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 8/16/25 at 7:11 am to
quote:

The Army Coprs singled out the Edwards admin. Quit shilling for those bozos


No they didn't. The author of that article did. Notice the lack of quotations like other comments by Colonel Jones.

quote:

Who was governor in 2022?


So? You think the governor personally did this? You big dummy.
This post was edited on 8/16/25 at 7:13 am
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33031 posts
Posted on 8/16/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

So? You think the governor personally did this?




His admin did it. HIS admin. People he put in those offices

Landrys admin found the intentional deception, and forwarded it to the ACoE. They cancelled the permit. JBE sucks and screwed this state over and over and over again. Groomers like you dont understand how politics works

Youre not a dummy, youre an idiot
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram