Started By
Message

re: Cops running drone-mounted radar on I-10 near Rayne?

Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:46 am to
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
22281 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:46 am to
quote:

If a neighbor kid decides to fly a UAV over my land, its coming down. If that's a federal offense then so be it.


Pretty sure there have been cases already about this exact scenario and the courts ruled in favor of the drone flyer. I guess the only thing you could hope for is to have solid evidence of breech of privacy, otherwise you are probably gonna "do the time".
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:51 am to
Cops have used planes to issue speeding tickets in the past.

In Missouri, the only time I ever heard of it is when university is done for the semester the cops will use planes to nab the speeders leaving the city (in this case Columbia)
Posted by OhMy
Member since Jan 2016
834 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:56 am to
So this is actually a 'when pigs fly' scenario?
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26336 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:06 am to
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76156 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Surprised no one tried to shoot it down and eat it..
First you make a roux...
Posted by Dont_Call_Me_RAY
Member since Feb 2017
1439 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

gonna "do the time".

Sure the law says "20 years in federal prison", but many have done this and I don't know of anyone who has come close to doing time. It is all part of the scare tactics by some people calling them "Aircraft".

Bottom line is I support UAVs. It is some of the idiots at the controls who are going to cause problems. So the technology has gotten ahead of the law. Let's take discharging a firearm out of the question, even though it is legal on my property. What if a drone over someone's house was taken down another way? Say, A water hose? Would that get 20 years in the pokie?
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:


It isn't worth getting charged with a felony and facing up to 20 years in a federal prison somewhere. Doesn't seem like that tough of a decision too me


Not cut and dried, many have been shot down and the FAA has not gotten involved.

I would not just blast away but there is legal precedent.

quote:

Now a Kentucky court has declared Merideth an innocent man. Bullitt County District Court Judge Rebecca Ward on Monday dismissed all charges against Merideth, reported local TV station WDRB-TV.

The drone's owner, David Boggs, had produced flight data that insisted his machine had been flying higher than Merideth had claimed.

The judge, however, seems not a fan of big data. She's a woman of the people. She declared that two human witnesses saw the drone below the tree line. This evidence was, to her, conclusive. To her, this was an invasion of Merideth's privacy.
Posted by DivotBreath
On the course
Member since Oct 2007
3735 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:25 am to
quote:

God forbid cops trying to enforce speed limits for our safety.


I've got no problem with the police enforcing speed limits as long as it is not a speed trap where the driver has to reduce speed dramatically in a short distance. Most folks that speed are just rushing to get to the next congested traffic area where they have to slow down again . . . what's the point?
Posted by BingWaterTiger
Member since May 2017
694 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:30 am to
quote:

WTF folks? Do we now get to look forward to a new form of enforcement terror from above?
nothing new really. VASCAR has been in use for decades
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16797 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

because a mile or so down the road was a cop, on the side of the road with lights on, holding what sure looked like to my driver buddy to be a remote control for said drone.


You could turn that cop into the FAA, because he would be breaking Federal law. Drone flights that have the drone going beyond visible range are illegal.

Wonder if he even has his Part 107 since he isn't using the drone for hobbyist purposes.

ETA: Ah, cable inspections, those guys know what they are doing.
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 9:39 am
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35690 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 9:44 am to

quote:

Take off every 'zig'!! You know what you doing. Move 'zig'. For great justice.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Waivers? The FAA does all the time.
not waivers to fly over interstates.
quote:

If they are flying that drone over the middle of the median, then they don't need a waiver.
well they have to get between the interstate and if they take off from the median some of those areas sure are thin to be flying a projectile between interstate traffic.
quote:

Cool, so I too can fly a "drone" over a median without a waiver?
if they can without you can without. you as a rec pilot have more freedom than they do.
quote:

Apparently you don't know very far
i dont know very what?
quote:

If a neighbor kid decides to fly a UAV over my land, its coming down. If that's a federal offense then so be it. Pretty sure there have been cases already about this exact scenario and the courts ruled in favor of the drone flyer. I guess the only thing you could hope for is to have solid evidence of breech of privacy, otherwise you are probably gonna "do the time".
maybe for destruction of property but it is illegal to fly over a person without their consent. which is why i hate it when i see a dude flying a drone over a parade or something like that.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
41382 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 3:14 pm to
They used to run Cessna single wings down Hwy 90 to catch speeders. It was really expensive so they only did it during peak travel times usually. I saw them flying in at least 5 occasions. It only makes sense to switch to drone technology.

Just look for the white lines painted perpendicular across the highway and slow down between line number 1 and 2.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
41382 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

VASCAR


This
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
41382 posts
Posted on 6/9/17 at 3:23 pm to
When does drone season officially open in Louisiana?
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 6/10/17 at 8:37 am to
quote:

God forbid cops trying to enforce speed limits for our safety.
quote:

God forbid cops trying to enforce speed limits for the sake of increasing revenue. FIFY
Therefore, all laws that may result in punitive fines should be stricken from the books. Laws that have consequences are bad laws. In addition, law enforcement entities don't cost anything to operate anyway. They just fall out the sky and work for free.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram