- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Cops filmed behaving badly say pot shop’s camera illegally recorded raid
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:41 am
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:41 am
quote:
Did you hear the one about the cops not wanting to use a store's surveillance tape to help solve a crime?
Who could blame these Santa Ana cops? Video shows them smashing surveillance cameras, badmouthing a woman in a wheelchair, and perhaps even munching on marijuana-infused products after they stormed a medical marijuana shop in Southern California, which was being investigated for allegedly operating unlawfully in the city.
Three of the unidentified cops are demanding that a judge block the police department from using the tapes against them as the department investigates the officers' conduct during the May raid. The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit. (PDF) The suit says the tapes were also "edited" and cannot be relied upon.
A hearing on the issue is scheduled for Monday in Orange County Superior Court.
The dispensary's attorney, Matthew Pappas, said in a telephone interview with Ars that "there is nothing doctored in those videos. Those videos are what the officers did."
"If officers concerned about the video showing something done being bad by them, they should not have broken the law during the raid," Pappas said.
The video shows the officers breaking through the door, ordering everybody down to the ground at gunpoint. The officers are also recorded playing darts and perhaps eating edible marijuana products. Two of them also joked about a wheelchair-bound amputee who was at the shop.
"Did you punch that one-legged old Benita?" one officer says.
Another replied: "I was about to kick her in her fricking nub:"
Pappas said he released two edited, short versions of the tapes to the media, one of which had added subtitles. But there is 14 hours worth of raw footage he turned over to the Santa Ana internal affairs investigators.
The three police officers trying to quash the tape contend the recording was illegal because, under California law, all parties to a confidential communication must consent to the recording.
Destructive cops caught playing darts, perhaps eating marijuana edibles.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:44 am to Street Hawk
I read this the other day and had a good
"The officers didn't know they were being recorded, thus the recording is illegal."
Reality: Cops disconnected all cameras except one. The video is "illegal" b/c of police incompetence.
"The tape is heavily edited"
Reality: The full length tape has been turned over to authorities.
"The officers didn't know they were being recorded, thus the recording is illegal."
Reality: Cops disconnected all cameras except one. The video is "illegal" b/c of police incompetence.
"The tape is heavily edited"
Reality: The full length tape has been turned over to authorities.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:47 am to Street Hawk
quote:
"Did you punch that one-legged old Benita?" one officer says.
Another replied: "I was about to kick her in her fricking nub:"
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:54 am to Street Hawk
Okay bootlickers, rationalize this one.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:56 am to LSUTANGERINE
There's nothing in the constitution that says you can film law enforcement. This is illegal surveillance by criminals trying to impede justice.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 10:15 am to LucasP
quote:
There's nothing in the constitution that says you can film law enforcement
there's nothing in the constitution about dressing in yak fur and taking a dump on patrol car's hood at noon in the town square, but try it and see how that works out for you.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:56 am to piratedude
Ignore LucasP, he likes to troll people in cop threads
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:01 pm to Street Hawk
quote:
The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit.

Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:21 pm to DrunkerThanThou
Eat a dick, I was just doing what he asked.
quote:
Okay bootlickers, rationalize this one
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:40 pm to Street Hawk
It simply reinforces what many people have always suspected and what continues to be proven time and time again - Cops are some of the worst criminals out there and when they think they're not being filmed and won't be held accountable they frequently abuse their power. The fact that this is not one rogue cop, but every cop that raided the dispensary acting together, with each LEO turning their head and condoning the unchecked inappropriate behavior from their peers suggests that this is department-wide accepted behavior and also suggests that this is not the first time this has happened.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:41 pm to LucasP
Not to mention the fact that they are evil pots peddlers and dope fiends trying to get our children hooked on drugs. Police need to use any means necessary to combat this evil.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:43 pm to Street Hawk
quote:
The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit.
quote:
The three police officers trying to quash the tape contend the recording was illegal because, under California law, all parties to a confidential communication must consent to the recording.
so basically they want a judge to rule that ALL security camera footage is illegal if the person filmed doesn't realize there is a security camera recording them.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:46 pm to Dr RC
Yeah, it's about as stupid as it gets. In a way it's trying to say that private businesses can't have security systems.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:47 pm to Peazey
quote:
In a way it's trying to say that private businesses can't have security systems.
No it's saying that private businesses can't illegally spy on law enforcers. I'm sure the evidence would hold up against bad guys.
Popular
Back to top
7











