Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Cops filmed behaving badly say pot shop’s camera illegally recorded raid

Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:41 am
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3659 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:41 am
quote:

Did you hear the one about the cops not wanting to use a store's surveillance tape to help solve a crime?

Who could blame these Santa Ana cops? Video shows them smashing surveillance cameras, badmouthing a woman in a wheelchair, and perhaps even munching on marijuana-infused products after they stormed a medical marijuana shop in Southern California, which was being investigated for allegedly operating unlawfully in the city.

Three of the unidentified cops are demanding that a judge block the police department from using the tapes against them as the department investigates the officers' conduct during the May raid. The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit. (PDF) The suit says the tapes were also "edited" and cannot be relied upon.

A hearing on the issue is scheduled for Monday in Orange County Superior Court.

The dispensary's attorney, Matthew Pappas, said in a telephone interview with Ars that "there is nothing doctored in those videos. Those videos are what the officers did."

"If officers concerned about the video showing something done being bad by them, they should not have broken the law during the raid," Pappas said.

The video shows the officers breaking through the door, ordering everybody down to the ground at gunpoint. The officers are also recorded playing darts and perhaps eating edible marijuana products. Two of them also joked about a wheelchair-bound amputee who was at the shop.

"Did you punch that one-legged old Benita?" one officer says.

Another replied: "I was about to kick her in her fricking nub:"

Pappas said he released two edited, short versions of the tapes to the media, one of which had added subtitles. But there is 14 hours worth of raw footage he turned over to the Santa Ana internal affairs investigators.

The three police officers trying to quash the tape contend the recording was illegal because, under California law, all parties to a confidential communication must consent to the recording.

Destructive cops caught playing darts, perhaps eating marijuana edibles.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23369 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:44 am to
I read this the other day and had a good


"The officers didn't know they were being recorded, thus the recording is illegal."

Reality: Cops disconnected all cameras except one. The video is "illegal" b/c of police incompetence.

"The tape is heavily edited"

Reality: The full length tape has been turned over to authorities.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30308 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:47 am to
quote:

"Did you punch that one-legged old Benita?" one officer says.

Another replied: "I was about to kick her in her fricking nub:"



Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:48 am to
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:54 am to
Okay bootlickers, rationalize this one.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 9:56 am to
There's nothing in the constitution that says you can film law enforcement. This is illegal surveillance by criminals trying to impede justice.
Posted by piratedude
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2009
2811 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

There's nothing in the constitution that says you can film law enforcement


there's nothing in the constitution about dressing in yak fur and taking a dump on patrol car's hood at noon in the town square, but try it and see how that works out for you.
Posted by DrunkerThanThou
Unfortunately Mississippi
Member since Feb 2013
2846 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:56 am to
Ignore LucasP, he likes to troll people in cop threads
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:21 pm to
Eat a dick, I was just doing what he asked.

quote:

Okay bootlickers, rationalize this one
Posted by DaTroof
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
992 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:40 pm to
It simply reinforces what many people have always suspected and what continues to be proven time and time again - Cops are some of the worst criminals out there and when they think they're not being filmed and won't be held accountable they frequently abuse their power. The fact that this is not one rogue cop, but every cop that raided the dispensary acting together, with each LEO turning their head and condoning the unchecked inappropriate behavior from their peers suggests that this is department-wide accepted behavior and also suggests that this is not the first time this has happened.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25428 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:41 pm to
Not to mention the fact that they are evil pots peddlers and dope fiends trying to get our children hooked on drugs. Police need to use any means necessary to combat this evil.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61617 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

The cops at the center of the investigation say the Sky High Medical Marijuana Dispensary illegally recorded them because the officers believed they had disabled all the store's cameras and therefore had an expectation of privacy "that their conversations were no longer being recorded," according to the cops' Aug. 5 lawsuit.
quote:



The three police officers trying to quash the tape contend the recording was illegal because, under California law, all parties to a confidential communication must consent to the recording.





so basically they want a judge to rule that ALL security camera footage is illegal if the person filmed doesn't realize there is a security camera recording them.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25428 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:46 pm to
Yeah, it's about as stupid as it gets. In a way it's trying to say that private businesses can't have security systems.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

In a way it's trying to say that private businesses can't have security systems.


No it's saying that private businesses can't illegally spy on law enforcers. I'm sure the evidence would hold up against bad guys.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram