Started By
Message

re: Cop shoots drunk disorderly fireman who should have complied

Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25342 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

The knee to the had probably wasn't, and it escalated the incident from resistance to fighting.


They were already grappling on the ground and the suspect was pulling away from the officer. They were already fighting.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:27 pm to
quote:


They were already grappling on the ground and the suspect was pulling away from the officer. They were already fighting.



Looked like he was resisting being cuffed. I wouldn't call that fighting. Watch it again. The guy is mildly resisting until then.

He turned on the cop when he got kneed in the head, but the shooting was justified.
This post was edited on 2/28/14 at 3:30 pm
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25342 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

I dont think most people realize how freaking hard it is to subdue someone. It is hard as hell and physically exhausting. It actually is damn near impossible if the person is bigger than you



I am not a small person by any stretch and I can assure you even a much smaller person is impossible to subdue when you must not inflict pain. If they have one hand or foot free they will get loose. Complete control of all extremities requires more than one person or a full body embrace.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

I agree the knee to the head was a miscalculation. He was tired, was struggling and was looking for a way to get the suspect subdued and cuffed to end the incident. I don't necessarily think he should be blamed for the knee, but in retrospect it was a miscalculation on his part.
Do you think he should be held responsible for his miscalculation that resulted in a death?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

He turned on the cop when he got kneed in the head, but the shooting was justified.



yea,the knee to the head was absurd. He used the gun because he had too, but it should have never escalated to that point
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25342 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:34 pm to
The miscalculation was loosing control of the suspect.

Does anyone here think the cops should have just kept ineffectively trying to cuff the guy?


Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Do you think he should be held responsible for his miscalculation that resulted in a death?

Not at all. His miscalculation didn't result in death, the guy beating him in the face and resisting arrest did. Your false logical leaps aren't persuasive.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91265 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

VerlanderBEAST


Your ignorance knows no boundaries.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Does anyone here think the cops should have just kept ineffectively trying to cuff the guy?
Sounds like a better option than getting pounded on until you have no choice than to kill the
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a better option than getting pounded on until you have no choice than to kill the

Are you trolling? Who could possibly believe he knowingly selected from these two choices?
This post was edited on 2/28/14 at 3:42 pm
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

His miscalculation didn't result in death, the guy beating him in the face and resisting arrest did.


The guy wasn't beating him in the face until the cop escalated the situation.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

The guy wasn't beating him in the face until the cop escalated the situation.

And the cop didn't escalate the situation until trying other reasonable means to cuff the suspect.

And the guy didn't get shot until he was pummeling the cop and breaking his face.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:


Does anyone here think the cops should have just kept ineffectively trying to cuff the guy?


I don't know their procedure, but there's a progression the local PD uses. Usually if they meet resistance they call backup. I've seen the local cops deal with a suspect for a long time til help arrives.

All procedures must follow this. They are not allowed to use excessive force or treat the arrestee cruelly. They are generally allowed to use the minimum amount of force necessary to bring the arrestee into compliance. I'm assuming the crime committed will come into play as well.

From what I've seen this didn't look like felony resisting. I'm not sure the officer meant to knee the guy in the head either though.

Most officers carry pepper spray, not sure why he didn't try that.
This post was edited on 2/28/14 at 3:48 pm
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Are you trolling? Who could possibly believe he knowingly selected from these two choices?


What did he think was going to happen if he wasn't strong enough to cuff the guy? Did he think the guy was just going to then lay there and let him knee him in the head?

His actions took it from a guy resisting arrest to a life and death fight.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

What did he think was going to happen if he wasn't strong enough to cuff the guy?
That he would have to get more physical in order to get the guy to stop resisting.

quote:

Did he think the guy was just going to then lay there and let him knee him in the head?
Wat? You make zero sense whatsoever.

quote:

His actions took it from a guy resisting arrest to a life and death fight.

No, the guy resisting arrest and then punching an armed police officer in the face repeatedly did that.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

And the cop didn't escalate the situation until trying other reasonable means to cuff the suspect.


He could of kept doing what he was doing until backup arrived. There was no need to escalate the situation.
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25342 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure the officer meant to knee the guy in the head either though


I agree with this, but figured no one else would see it that way so did not bring it up.

Looked to me like he tried to switch positions over the suspects head so he could control both arms with the head down and hopefully get him cuffed (not a position I would have taken). In the transition he landed his knee on the guys face.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68745 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:51 pm to
Your position here is truly absurd.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
61097 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:51 pm to
I'm not even sure the cop meant to knee the guy in the head
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 3:52 pm to
I completely understand why the cop ended up firing his weapon. But why didn't he taze the guy, or use pepper spray first?

And did the cop ask the people filming to help him?
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram