Started By
Message

re: Cool old pictures - more pics throughout thread

Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:40 am to
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76780 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:40 am to
what exactly is that "performer" performing?
Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:41 am to

Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106065 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I don't think so. The last thing they heard was throttle up, then boom.





The astronauts may not have not known, but NASA had been warned launching in cold weather was dangerous.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76780 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:43 am to
6th from the right is joe dirt's mom?
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:45 am to
Posted by the paradigm
Moon Township, PA
Member since Sep 2017
5417 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:45 am to
That pic of Andre is from the late-80s, not 70s.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103861 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:45 am to



E.T. Phone home
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34771 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The astronauts may not have not known, but NASA had been warned launching in cold weather was dangerous.


That was a known fact because of the O rings on the solid rocket boosters... and that's exactly what came of it during the investigation...
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 9:48 am
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:47 am to
quote:

But you go ahead believing there was a US Government conspiracy.


Many government conspiracies have been shown to be true in hindsight.

I'm not claiming there was a huge plot. I don't know. I am confident we don't know anything close to the truth. I mean, if you don't believe the government is involved in conspiracies, you've got your head stuck in the sand. It's open knowledge. There are wikipedia articles for Christ's sake.
Posted by NotGrammarKnotsi
Member since Jan 2018
314 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:49 am to
quote:

There are wikipedia articles


Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34771 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:49 am to
quote:

There are wikipedia articles for Christ's sake.


Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32377 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:50 am to
A female fisherman with 2 tarpons caught off Florida, US in 1891.


A Russian man confronts a guard after the liberation of the Buchenwald concentration camp in Thuringia, Germany in 1945.


A damaged US B-17 Bomber after a mission over Cologne, Germany in 1944.


Jewish refugees, mostly children, in camps in Israel after leaving their homes in Yemen to join the Jewish state in 1954.


A video conference in Sweden in 1960.


Men pose in front of a helicopter in East Tilbury, England in 1955.


Russian soldiers in Leningrad in 1944.

Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76780 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:50 am to
quote:

There are wikipedia articles for Christ's sake.


why are they only for his sake?
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:51 am to
You do realize wikipedia articles are sourced from other actual articles right? Or would that challenge your beliefs too much?
Posted by NotGrammarKnotsi
Member since Jan 2018
314 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:52 am to
quote:

articles are sourced


That means they have SOME truth to them..yes, I agree to that
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22407 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:52 am to
quote:

What I find interesting is the B25 bomber. And yet somehow 9/11 brought down 5 buildings.


The B-25 had nowhere near the velocity and mass of the planes hitting the WTC. The Empire State Building was better engineered than the buildings that fell on 9/11.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32377 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:53 am to
Soldiers wearing armor after it was tested with different types of firearms at Fort de la Peigney in France in 1918. They were not wearing the armor when it was tested.


Sami men with reindeer in Northern Sweden in 1939.


Posted by pdubya76
Sw Ms
Member since Mar 2012
6580 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:53 am to
I have a 1987 Big Red just like that. Cranks right up.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34771 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:53 am to
No wonder they called that thing "The Flying Fortress"...

Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:54 am to
quote:

MYTH 2: CHALLENGER CREW DIED INSTANTLY The seven-astronaut crew for the space shuttle Challenger's fatal mission smile for the cameras as they leave for the launch pad 25 years ago, on January 27, 1986. Another myth—popular perhaps because it is, in a way, comforting—is that Challenger's seven astronauts died instantly when the shuttle "exploded."


quote:

But the shuttle crew was not blown up, nor did they die when the shuttle broke apart. Although the exact cause of death is unknown, many experts now think the astronauts were alive until the crew cabin hit the Atlantic Ocean at more than 321 kilometres an hour. "They were still strapped in their seats when they were found," the National Air and Space Museum's Neal said. What's less clear is whether the astronauts were conscious during their final moments. A NASA medical report concluded that "it is possible, but not certain, that the crew lost consciousness due to an in-flight loss of crew module pressure."
Nat Goe article
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram