Started By
Message

re: Connie Chung breaks silence about sexual assault by her doctor 50 years ago

Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:10 am to
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:

but if a proctologist "rythmically" checked your prostate, would you feel finger raped


You know when you do a pelvic exam you are feeling for certain structures so inherently you have to move your fingers, you don’t just stick them in an let the marinate. Maybe she misinterpreted what she was feeling?

The key would be how long was he probing her to take her to orgasm. Why didn’t she say how long he did it for?
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 10:12 am
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:11 am to
quote:

You know when you do a pelvic exam you are feeling for certain structures so inherently you have to move your fingers, you don’t just stick them in an let the marinate. Maybe she misinterpreted what she was feeling?

ding! ding! ding!
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
13436 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:12 am to
She must have found out the Doctor was a filthy conservative!
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:15 am to
“He stuck his fingers in my vagina and moved them around!!!”

Uhhh yea. That’s called a pelvic exam. Ask any woman who has had that uncomfortable experience.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The key would be how long was he probing her to take her to orgasm.

have to make a thorough exam

quote:

Why didn’t she say how long he did it for?

as long as it took she's have probably filed a complaint if he finished before she did
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19126 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I had a lady doctor grab my balls when I was 12 or 13 for a medical examination. I got a boner. I felt so ashamed about it then, but it's time to come forward and tell my truth.


quote:

Did she move her fingers rhythmically?




Most insurance plans don't cover that.
Posted by randybobandy
NOLA
Member since Mar 2015
1908 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:39 am to
quote:

if a proctologist "rythmically" checked your prostate, would you feel finger raped?


No, in todays world that would be inclusive and diverse and the fricker would get a braveness award or community hero award for playing in the dirt. Libtard democrats celebrate every perversion and abortion to include everyone. Even the mentally ill.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

This is one of the ore believable rape stories that have come out, but people in this thread are still just cracking jokes like it’s a made up story.

Yeah I guess the timing is weird 50 years later, but I doubt someone who already has money is looking for a pay day 50 years later.


Yeah, I believe Connie for some reason.

She isn't looking for money and hasn't named the guy, who is most likely dead already. This story seems really plausible tbh.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:48 am to
quote:

You know when you do a pelvic exam you are feeling for certain structures so inherently you have to move your fingers, you don’t just stick them in an let the marinate. Maybe she misinterpreted what she was feeling?

The key would be how long was he probing her to take her to orgasm. Why didn’t she say how long he did it for?


Well, I'm sure she's had dozens of pelvic exams since then and if all of them had been like that, she'd probably not be calling it out

Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68446 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:00 pm to
I think so too.

I don’t think she’s wanting a pay day, but to reveal this 50 years later is kinda odd.

Then again this is happening more frequently, this is more about awareness and prevention
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:16 pm to
Right.

I think these movements have good and bad aspects of them.

Its good that women who were actually abused/assaulted are feeling empowered to speak up about abuse.

Its bad that some women are exaggerating or lying about abuse/assault for attention and ruining mens' lives.

I believe Connie because I don't see an ulterior motive here and her story sounds very plausible.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

to my shock, I had an orgasm for the first time in my life. My body jerked several times


Sounds like doc knew the g-spot location.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

I believe Connie because I don't see an ulterior motive here and her story sounds very plausible.


That’s great, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. But it ends there... at an opinion. Nothing can or should be done 50 years later without any evidence. The danger is that people think that because Ford sounds convincing that she is speaking the truth. I don’t know how many times it needs to be said that someone can think they are 100% telling the truth and they may have their facts wrong. I’ll go into the unreliability of eye witness accounts if you want.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Nothing can or should be done 50 years later without any evidence.


Is she asking anything to be done? Did I insinuate something should be done? I don't know why you're arguing with me.

She's just speaking out about it in effort to encourage other actual victims to speak out, who may have more recent situations.

shite, she remembers a lot more details than Ford
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 12:25 pm
Posted by rld280z
Richmond, VA
Member since Mar 2018
142 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:24 pm to
Kinda like us older male ex athletes. The older we get, the better we were.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Is she asking anything to be done? Did I insinuate something should be done? I don't know why you're arguing with me.


You aren’t. But plenty of other people are, not in Connie Chung’s case specifically but in most of these cases. shite that’s what the entire argument over Kavanaugh is about... that he shouldn’t be allowed to serve on the Supreme Court because of convincing story.
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:30 pm to
Well this isn’t about Kavanaugh so quit melting.

Every case should be looked at separately on its own merits. Both sides of the aisle need to learn that.
Posted by Johnny Carson
Member since Jul 2010
1009 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 12:33 pm to
Sounds like ole doc was playing Chinese Finger Cuffs with her
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 1:27 pm to
It’s exactly the same as Kavanaugh, that’s why it’s in the news. Stop being naive. This is heresay without corroborating evidence.

They are trying to present more and more cases especially from well known people for a reason.

“We can trust Connie Chung and she was raped 50 years ago, therefore we can trust Dr. Ford, therefor Kavanaugh shouldn’t be appointed”

If you don’t think that is the narrative that is being pushed you are very VERY naive
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68446 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 1:49 pm to
I agree with that
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram