- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Company hired to clean NOLA catch basins fired by City after less than 3 weeks
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:10 pm to Brummy
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:10 pm to Brummy
This is a good thing overall.
Of course like any shitty political deal in the state, bad companies get hired all of the time.
At least this time, someone was actually paying attention and expecting some kind of results.
I bet two years ago if this contract had been awarded, none of the buffoons in city hall would have even followed up to see that the scope was being executed properly.
Of course like any shitty political deal in the state, bad companies get hired all of the time.
At least this time, someone was actually paying attention and expecting some kind of results.
I bet two years ago if this contract had been awarded, none of the buffoons in city hall would have even followed up to see that the scope was being executed properly.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:10 pm to Brummy
Don't know if it was in the past three weeks, but after the flooding someone posted a picture on this site of ~10 guys + one vacuum truck working on one catch basin. Obviously that resulted in about 8 guys standing around with their thumbs up their asses. That kind of inefficiency screams government, but it may have been this company. Does anyone here remember/have the picture?
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:11 pm to notiger1997
quote:
I bet two years ago if this contract had been awarded, none of the buffoons in city hall would have even followed up to see that the scope was being executed properly.
What changed over the past two years? I'm not being flip, I'm genuinely curious as to why you're saying that.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:12 pm to Brummy
Is there any maintenance that could occur to prevent having to spend $7 million to clear them?
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:12 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
Don't know if it was in the past three weeks, but after the flooding someone posted a picture on this site of ~10 guys + one vacuum truck working on one catch basin. Obviously that resulted in about 8 guys standing around with their thumbs up their asses. That kind of inefficiency screams government, but it may have been this company. Does anyone here remember/have the picture?
That isn't just government. The private sector is full of 6 layers of chiefs watching one Indian.
This post was edited on 9/22/17 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:13 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What changed over the past two years?
Nothing, which is why I agree with previous posters that think that it really may be a kickback issue. It's sad that ATTEMPTING to rectify incompetence is enough cause for celebration in NOLA.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:17 pm to Brummy
Since when has poor performance ever voided a NOLA city contract? 
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:18 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I just think there is so much pressure on the drainage and pumps issue, etc that the loons running things have no choice but to pay attention to things.
Before the Sewage and Water Board fiasco, the public didn't care and the people in charge were just their normal lazy selves.
Before the Sewage and Water Board fiasco, the public didn't care and the people in charge were just their normal lazy selves.
This post was edited on 9/22/17 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:19 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
That isn't just government. The private sector is full of 6 layers of chiefs watching one Indian.
Yes, but I find that it's mostly private sector working on roads and other public bid projects. I spend a decent amount of time on commercial construction jobs and generally see all of the contract workers doing a decent to great job. They might do things incorrectly sometimes, but there's not a lot of farting around. The worst case I can think of was one GC overseeing one electrician for stretches at a time, but that was near the end of a project and there were other workers coming and going.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:20 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Since when has poor performance ever voided a NOLA city contract?
I remember when the Super Dome was being built, it was a was a bit of a joke with overruns, kick backs, and being behind schedule and whatnot
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:20 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
It's sad that ATTEMPTING to rectify incompetence is enough cause for celebration in NOLA.
What is worse, this company may be legit, doing a good job.
But someone with hands in mitches pocket wants the money instead, and will get it.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:21 pm to magildachunks
quote:
A waste company needs to be told in a bid how to legally dispose of waste? Shouldn't they know this already?
I'm just relaying what the spokesman for Mitch said. The logistics were straightened out after awarding the bid. That seems a bit backwards.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:22 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
What is worse, this company may be legit, doing a good job.
But someone with hands in mitches pocket wants the money instead, and will get it.
Agreed, but some of the info (like the # of trucks available) should be easily verifiable. Hopefully more comes out.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:23 pm to slackster
quote:
The logistics were straightened out after awarding the bid. That seems a bit backwards.
It seems to be pretty standard in NOLA.

Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:23 pm to magildachunks
quote:
A waste company needs to be told in a bid how to legally dispose of waste?
Shouldn't they know this already?
those specs are typically spelled out in the bid/contract
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:24 pm to Fun Bunch
A lot of people. They hired the old public works director from Baton Rouge. Had to get the attorney general ruling to hire him. They also have a sister company in Kenner that has a lot of ties to the S&WB.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:24 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
What is worse, this company may be legit, doing a good job.
Just from the quoted parts of the article, it sounds like they couldn't even get near the amount of trucks that they were supposed to. That right there right from the start takes pretty much all doubt out of the discussion about if they were doing a good job or not.
quote:
But someone with hands in mitches pocket wants the money instead, and will get it.
Maybe, but it seems to me that someone would have been given the work if this were the case. Mitch could have made that happen with the quickness if he wanted with the award.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:39 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Compliance Envirosystems, LLC
So who are they related to?
Not sure, but they just made a $5K contribution to Desiree Charbonnet's campaign on 8/28/17. They've also contributed $5K in 2015 and 2016 to John Bel Edwards, and $7.5K since 2010 to Mitch Landrieu.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 1:29 pm to slackster
Them kickbacks called "campaign donations ....

Posted on 9/22/17 at 2:10 pm to PUB
RAMJ is not a DBE. Although they are, and always have been (even before they changed names) politically connected. The vast majority of their connections have not been in NO. Jefferson, St. Charles, and St. John is where they have done the majority of their business.
The main problem is Public Bid Law. Low bid rarely is the best value. The second problem is crappy specifications. Whether it be from a municipality, or an engineer.
In this specific case, the low bidder is of the wrong ethnicity. Period. And I have no clue who the second bidder is in this case.
The main problem is Public Bid Law. Low bid rarely is the best value. The second problem is crappy specifications. Whether it be from a municipality, or an engineer.
In this specific case, the low bidder is of the wrong ethnicity. Period. And I have no clue who the second bidder is in this case.
Popular
Back to top


1






