- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clemson University Requires All Freshman to Take New Social Justice Course
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:09 am to misstery
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:09 am to misstery
quote:
Telling people what to do because they aren't "acting right" is the road to fascism
quote:
This is simply not true and cannot be debated.
Adolph and a Benito would disagree.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 11:13 am
0
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:09 am to misstery
quote:
Diversity = opposing views
This is not what the progressives are preaching at all little miss snowflake.
The progressives/libertarians/what ever the hell you call yourself say Diversity = Non-White.
Its a war on straight white people (males mostly)
if you cant see that is what the "left" is preaching then you are crazy.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:10 am to upgrayedd
i think people just need to keep opinions to themselves. it would solve a lot.
why does their opinion matter? because they were coddled as a kid by shitty parents
why does their opinion matter? because they were coddled as a kid by shitty parents
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:10 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Of course you can't debate it. You're not knowledgeable enough. You throw around labels without having the most remote idea of what they mean in the real world.
I debate it frequently and I win most of the debates. I respond with substance, and other than scruffy and even the sometimes insulting but usually thoughtful Gray, I get not substantive responses. Roger will respond to.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:11 am to Scruffy
quote:
Their idea of "libertarianism" is that they believe you are free as long as you only act, think, and speak a certain way.
This is what most of the left has become. They can say what you aren't allowed to say because they have moral righteousness on their side.
Case in point - the Hillary/DeBlasio CPT skit.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:11 am to misstery
quote:
I debate it frequently and I win most of the debates
We're going to introduce another word Here, delusion.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:14 am to someLSUdoosh
quote:
This is not what the progressives are preaching at all little miss snowflake.
The progressives/libertarians/what ever the hell you call yourself say Diversity = Non-White.
Its a war on straight white people (males mostly)
if you cant see that is what the "left" is preaching then you are crazy.
Really? The "war" on straight white people, "mostly" males," is a huge myth. We're talking about society's most privileged group. I like straight white males. There is no war and this is a fact that cannot be argued.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:15 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Upperdecker
Dammit, you kinda checkmated me there. Luckily I'm not some kind of pussy who admits when he's wrong.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:15 am to misstery
quote:
Really? The "war" on straight white people, "mostly" males," is a huge myth. We're talking about society's most privileged group. I like straight white males. There is no war and this is a fact that cannot be argued.
It can be argued. We're arguing it right now. FACT.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:17 am to misstery
quote:
. I like straight white males
You fail the progressive litmus test.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:18 am to upgrayedd
quote:
This is what most of the left has become. They can say what you aren't allowed to say because they have moral righteousness on their side.
Case in point - the Hillary/DeBlasio CPT skit.
I don't think any politician, with very few exceptions, has "moral righteousness" on their side. They look out for themselves, lie about their positions, pander, etc.
I love President Obama, but he did the same - he was against marriage equality until it became politically expedient to embrace it.
I disagreed with Ron Paul on many issues, but I liked him because he told the truth about his positions. I used to strongly admire Bernie Sanders, and still do to some extent, but he also has made some political moves I didn't care for.
I get frustrated when those who have had advantages in their life (for example, me) don't recognize that certain groups generally have not had those advantages.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:21 am to misstery
quote:
don't think any politician, with very few exceptions, has "moral righteousness" on their side.
You could argue Bernie. But the only reason you could argue that is because he talks about wealth and actual privilege instead of race and sex-based emotional arguments.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We're going to introduce another word Here, delusion.
Delusional? No. Delusional are people who look up and say "oh, look at those lovely 'contrails' no one is dumping shite all over me" or "lets increase the EMF blasts all over our house" and "no one weaponizes cell phones." Now, this is the delusional people.
I don't want to get on a tangent, though I'm very right about this.
There is no war on white males.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:25 am to misstery
quote:
even the sometimes insulting but usually thoughtful Gray, I get not substantive responses. Roger will respond to.
Maybe they just don't understand what you are saying???
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:25 am to LucasP
quote:
Dammit, you kinda checkmated me there. Luckily I'm not some kind of pussy who admits when he's wrong.
Then which kind of pussy are you?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:25 am to misstery
quote:
I don't think any politician, with very few exceptions, has "moral righteousness" on their side. They look out for themselves, lie about their positions, pander, etc
Of course they do. My example shows that two wealthy white people can stand on stage and joke about "colored people time" with zero negative ramifications because they are part of a political party that is "morally righteous" in it's cause. You think that skit doesn't explode if Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina act it out?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:26 am to misstery
quote:
Being a libertarian progressive,
What the fricking frick?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:27 am to misstery
quote:
though I'm very right about this.
You're wrong and there's no debate here whatsoever. FACT.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:29 am to misstery
quote:
though I'm very right about this.
Except in a very small % of the time, "right" shouldn't be qualified...Either you are right or you are not right.
Debating with you would make Broke very, very angry.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 11:30 am
Posted on 4/18/17 at 11:30 am to upgrayedd
quote:
You're wrong and there's no debate here whatsoever. FACT.
I see your game here.
The difference here is that when I'm right because I have provided facts and factual opinions (thought not always in the same post) so I'm correct when I say that something is not debatable and is factual.
You just say it is a fact because you said it.
Page 7 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News