- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:00 pm to GetBackToWork
Yup.
Most middle class to upper middle class people, particularly with families, don’t want to live in or around multi-family housing.
When you make it a mixed up free-for-all, they’ll simply leave. You’ll have really wealthy people living in high rises and poor people living in crappy looking complexes and nothing in between.
Most middle class to upper middle class people, particularly with families, don’t want to live in or around multi-family housing.
When you make it a mixed up free-for-all, they’ll simply leave. You’ll have really wealthy people living in high rises and poor people living in crappy looking complexes and nothing in between.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:02 pm to USMEagles
quote:
People ought to be allowed to build whatever the eff they want to build.
I hope someone builds a Section 8 complex next door to you and on the other side someone builds a methodone clinic.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 2:46 pm to NOLALGD
This has UN Agenda 2030 written all over it. No pun intended.
This is fricking terrible. Rotten shitbag pukes are trying to destroy this country.
This is fricking terrible. Rotten shitbag pukes are trying to destroy this country.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 9:18 am to USMEagles
quote:
People ought to be allowed to build whatever the eff they want to build.
Lack of zoning is why so many cities in Louisiana de-generate into shite-holes.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 9:21 am to NOLALGD
Well, I guess it makes sense in large metros, at least inside the city limits. My question is this: will they be condos and rental apartments or more housing that tax payers have to foot the bill for?
Posted on 7/18/19 at 9:51 am to USMEagles
quote:
People ought to be allowed to build whatever the eff they want to build
As long as they don't build next to me, right?
Posted on 7/18/19 at 10:16 am to DeafJam73
quote:
My question is this: will they be condos and rental apartments or more housing that tax payers have to foot the bill for?
Mostly condos and market rentals. Developers make more money on those.
NIMBYism is a huge barrier for these kinds of zoning overhauls, but many cities are looking at affordability crises and ultimately won’t have a ton of other options. Zoning regs have to be loosened for developers to increase supply profitably.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 11:12 am to Crowknowsbest
This idea won't work everywhere. In the article the developers said this won't result in a ton of new infill housing in most places. My best guess is most of the infill will only happen in walkable neighborhoods near commercial corridors and good transit access (i.e. near the rail line in Minneapolis).
Also if done correctly its a way to keep aging and income restricted homeowner residents in increasing expensive urban neighborhoods. There might be some folks with 4 bedroom houses where the kids are gone who don't want to sellout and move. Why shouldn't they be allowed to use the equity to create a second unit that they rent out for income while they live there. In this case there are no negative impacts as they probably created more traffic/waste/noise, etc. when they had 4 children living in the house than renting a second unit to 2 young professionals.
Also if done correctly its a way to keep aging and income restricted homeowner residents in increasing expensive urban neighborhoods. There might be some folks with 4 bedroom houses where the kids are gone who don't want to sellout and move. Why shouldn't they be allowed to use the equity to create a second unit that they rent out for income while they live there. In this case there are no negative impacts as they probably created more traffic/waste/noise, etc. when they had 4 children living in the house than renting a second unit to 2 young professionals.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 11:16 am to thekid
quote:
Lack of zoning is why so many cities in Louisiana de-generate into shite-holes.
Depends on the City, besides many of the Louisiana cities the OT hates have had zoning for decades.
Bigger problem is communities arbitrarily enforcing rules and allowing new development with crappy infrastructure....i.e. the son of the parish judge being allowed to illegally subdivide a piece of property and develop a neighborhood with crappy houses to make a quick buck.
Popular
Back to top


1






