Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Chicago City Attorney resigns after burying evidence in police shooting

Posted on 1/4/16 at 7:46 pm
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 7:46 pm
Stuff like this is why there's a growing distrust of the judicial system. Not surprising, but still disappointing...

quote:

For four years, Officer Raoul Mosqueda offered the same account of the January night when he shot and killed a man during a traffic stop on Chicago’s South Side.

Mosqueda and his partner, Gildardo Sierra, heard over their police car radio that officers were looking for an Oldsmobile Aurora involved in a shooting. A gun could be inside the car, the dispatcher warned. They saw a similar vehicle and instructed it to pull over; then the officers approached the two men inside, guns drawn. There was a confrontation, the car backed up and began to drive away, and Mosqueda opened fire, killing driver Darius Pinex.

For four years, the evidence that could have verified or refuted that account — a recording of the dispatch from that night — was nowhere to be found. Attorneys for the city said the recording didn’t exist, even as a wrongful-death lawsuit brought by Pinex’s family went to trial.

Then, in late February, too late for attorneys for the Pinex family to adjust their case, it emerged that an attorney for the city had the recording after all but waited more than a week before telling the Pinex family. A federal jury ultimately found that Mosqueda and Sierra were justified in the shooting.

But on Monday, a federal judge ruled that the lawyer, senior attorney for the city Jordan Marsh, intentionally hid evidence that could have changed the outcome of the case. The Oldsmobile described by the dispatcher had a different temporary license plate number than the one driven by Pinex. And the dispatcher in the recording made no mention of a shooting or a gun in the vehicle — the reason Mosqueda gave for approaching the car with his gun drawn.

“After hiding that information, despite there being numerous times when the circumstances dictated he say something about it, Marsh said nothing and even made misleading statements to the Court when the issue arose,” U.S. District Judge Edmond Chang wrote, reversing the federal jury’s decision and calling for a new trial in the case brought by Pinex’s family.

Marsh resigned just hours later, according to the Associated Press.



quote:

Corporation Counsel Stephen Patton — Chicago’s top legal officer who handles civil claims against the city — told the Chicago Tribune on Monday that the city is doubling down on its efforts to train lawyers on producing records. He also challenged the notion that there are widespread accountability or transparency problems in how the city deals with such cases.

“To say this is a practice, a systemic abuse or part of a coverup, there’s just no evidence of that,” Patton said. “There’s nothing in the ruling to support it.”




Washington Post

Eta- changed link to better description of story.
This post was edited on 1/5/16 at 8:59 am
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 7:52 pm to
Make no mistake, the cover-up was 110% orchestrated by Rahm Emanuel.
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
32982 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Jordan Marsh


Isn't this the name Of a department store?
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 8:58 pm to
Happens everyday all over this country
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39795 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Make no mistake, the cover-up was 110% orchestrated by Rahm Emanuel.



Yep, had that election thing to worry about.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:29 pm to
LINK
Different Chicago paper where you don't have to register and pay to read.

quote:

Attorneys for Pinex asked the city for the recording so they could show the officers were not acting on information that would have justified an aggressive traffic stop resulting in Pinex’s death.

Mosqueda had initially claimed he stopped the Oldsmobile Aurora that Pinex was driving based on an Englewood District police radio broadcast that warned the car might have been involved in a shooting in a different police district about three hours earlier.

Mosqueda said he jumped out of his police SUV with his gun drawn because of the warning.

But the recorded broadcast didn’t actually say anything about an Oldsmobile Aurora being wanted in a shooting or having a gun inside.

It only said cops in the South Chicago District had chased a ’98 Olds Aurora with temporary plates and the pursuit was terminated, according to Chang.

Marsh “buried” the Englewood audio recording and gave misleading statements at the trial — even saying the recording would have been “recycled a long time ago” — before he admitted its possible existence, the judge wrote.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
20408 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:34 pm to
I once was arguing with a US DOJ attorney over a case and things got heated. She yelled out : "You don't understand, I don't care about who was right. I just get paid to win." The room got real quiet, they called a recess and she didn't come back. I was stunned.
Posted by sullivanct19a
Florida
Member since Oct 2015
5239 posts
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

I once was arguing with a US DOJ attorney over a case and things got heated. She yelled out : "You don't understand, I don't care about who was right. I just get paid to win." The room got real quiet, they called a recess and she didn't come back. I was stunned.


Gosh there was a speech some time ago about the duties and roles and obligations of US Atty's and their responsibility to justice and how the American people are always best served by justice being done. I guess she didn't read that one.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 6:42 am to
quote:

once was arguing with a US DOJ attorney over a case and things got heated. She yelled out : "You don't understand, I don't care about who was right. I just get paid to win." The room got real quiet, they called a recess and she didn't come back. I was stunned.



This is the mentality of the majority of prosecutors out there. It's not about justice.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
30970 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 6:52 am to
Similar to Benghazi, government cover up. As I get older the more lean towards libertarian views in that I just want the government the frick outta my life.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28294 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 7:22 am to
Yeah it's not that I trust the govt less than individuals, but individuals I can fight. The govt is unstoppable if it really wants to punish you.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52640 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 7:24 am to
Rahm Emmanuel would resign if he had any integrity at all.





But, he won't.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84835 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 7:26 am to
quote:

I once was arguing with a US DOJ attorney over a case and things got heated. She yelled out : "You don't understand, I don't care about who was right. I just get paid to win." The room got real quiet, they called a recess and she didn't come back. I was stunned.


Should have told her only defense attorneys can say that.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 7:30 am to
quote:

This is the mentality of the majority of prosecutors out there. It's not about justice.


Yep. I sure wish they had the towering integrity level of most defense and plaintiff's attorneys.
Posted by JohnZeroQ
Pelicans of Lafourche
Member since Jan 2012
8536 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 8:20 am to
I heard it on The Departed




ETA: I Sawrr it on the Departed
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Yep. I sure wish they had the towering integrity level of most defense and plaintiff's attorneys.


That's partially true, but it ignores the whole quid pro quo that prosecutors are uniquely suited for with police.

A defense or plaintiff attorney can't cover for the police and get extralegal powers like prosecutors can. Meanwhile police give prosecutors juicy (and sometimes loaded) cases to convict and gain de facto legal immunity. It's dirty both ways.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
46002 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 8:38 am to
Democrats gonna lie and cheat and cover up. Its just in their nature.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 8:38 am to
quote:

It's dirty both ways.


I wasn't simply pointing this out. I wasn't defending prosecutors.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 9:00 am to
quote:


I wasn't simply pointing this out. I wasn't defending prosecutors.


No worries- I misunderstood you
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12733 posts
Posted on 1/5/16 at 9:01 am to
Because all the state cares about is getting convictions of the accused and protecting their own. It's sickening
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram