
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ChatGPT faked testimony in murder appeal, court finds
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:21 pm
quote:
A defense lawyer appealing his client's murder conviction submitted a brief containing made-up police testimony and witnesses fabricated by OpenAI's ChatGPT, New Mexico's highest court said.
The New ?Mexico Supreme Court on Wednesday fined the attorney, Stephen Aarons, and held him in contempt for failing to verify ?the accuracy of the court filing, which Aarons said he prepared with help from the AI program.
The filing "contained false testimony from wholly fabricated witnesses," ?the court said.
The panel also said Aarons had "demonstrated a lack of remorse and a lack of concern for his client." The justices fined Aarons $5,000 and said they will refer him to an attorney disciplinary board for investigation.
Aarons in a statement to Reuters said he had used ChatGPT to summarize the trial proceedings when he agreed to take up the defendant's appeal last year, ?and did not understand the degree ?to which AI could "hallucinate" facts.
"I am remorseful but hopeful that the disciplinary board takes into account it was an honest mistake," he said. "It is a lesson learned for all professionals who ?rely upon this powerful but sometimes unstable technology."
OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The court's sanction is the latest in a growing number of cases in which state and federal judges have disciplined lawyers for submitting court documents generated ?by AI ?tools without adequately vetting them.
LINK
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:23 pm to Jim Rockford
He should be disciplined severely. The least a lawyer can do is double check the damn cites that the AI comes up with. It’s already saving him so much time. How lazy can you be?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:27 pm to BayouBandit24
Last year LAPELS (Louisiana engineering board) held a web class on AI basically about this same issue. Facts being wrong that AI gives.
AI is a tool, not a replacement.
AI is a tool, not a replacement.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:31 pm to tigeraddict
AI has the garbage in, garbage out problem. It isn't actually doing work. It's just compiling data.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 4:21 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
It isn't actually doing work. It's just compiling data.
I am an AI dumbass and I get this. Why can’t others understand it?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 4:26 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
AI has the garbage in, garbage out problem. It isn't actually doing work. It's just compiling data.
I don't use it, how did it generate fabricated witnesses and statements? Did he accidentally enter in extra documents from another case or something?
Posted on 9/11/26 at 4:43 pm to nes2010
quote:
I don't use it, how did it generate fabricated witnesses and statements? Did he accidentally enter in extra documents from another case or something?
It just scours the Internet.
Another lawyer got caught using AI because he included citations from cases that never happened.
Posted on 9/11/26 at 5:22 pm to BayouBandit24
Disbar. If you can’t do the work, don’t take on the job.

Popular
Back to top
1









