- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Charges dropped against activists protesting Louisiana pipeline
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:42 pm
quote:
Environmental groups celebrated Tuesday as they announced that District Attorney Bofill “Bo” Duhé, chief prosecutor in St. Martin, Iberia and St. Mary Parishes, rejected all charges against 17 people who were charged with crimes in 2018 for violating a law making it a felony to be at or near pipelines or construction sites without permission.
The Louisiana Legislature amended the state’s critical infrastructure law in 2018 to include pipelines as critical infrastructure. That meant environmentalists protesting at pipeline sites could be sentenced up to five years in prison.
The week after the new law went into effect, three Bayou Bridge Pipeline protesters were arrested and charged while kayaking near the site. Cindy Spoon, Sophia Cook-Phillips and Eric Moll. Over the next two months, 14 others were charged with similar felonies.
Some of those who were arrested challenged the constitutionality of the law, saying that the law was vague, violated their due process and the First Amendment. Louisiana has more than 125,000 miles of pipelines, most of which are underground and not visible. Additionally, some of the arrests were made on property that the pipeline company was trespassing on, according to the Center for Constitutional Rights, which says it works with “communities under threat to fight for justice and liberation through litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications.” Other arrests were made by law enforcement officers moonlighting for a private security company hired by Bayou Bridge Pipeline, the CCR said.
Bill Quigley, a professor at Loyola New Orleans College of Law has been representing the protesters pro bono for the last three years, and he said Tuesday said the cases against them were bogus.
“These folks never should’ve been arrested to begin with, and the charges should’ve been dismissed right out of hand, but it’s good that it’s done,” Quigley said. “This is a courageous bunch. It’s hard for anybody to protest at all, it’s extra hard when you’re worried you’re going to get arrested and it’s even harder when you might be facing a felony charge.”
Quigley added that the first three kayakers had permission from Atchafalaya Basin property owners for their on-site protest.
Duhé confirmed with KATC that he dropped the charges for those accused of trespassing, saying that trespassing could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
“We were waiting on some of the cases that were on-going in the civil arena, to see where they ended up,” Duhé said.”That weighed into the evidence in the criminal prosecution. Based upon those rulings, at the end of the day, we felt that the evidence was insufficient to support a criminal charge.”
Quigley remains involved with the ongoing White Hat v. Landry case, which challenges the constitutionality of the amended statute.
Spoon, one of the first three arrested, said the pipeline, built by Energy Transfer Partners, is still a force to be reckoned with.
“Companies like Energy Transfer Partners and the politicians that do their bidding are trying to deter us from defending our communities from the devastating impacts of new fossil fuel infrastructure,” Spoon said. “They have tried to criminalize us and our actions since the Indigenous resistance at Standing Rock. In our cases specifically, Bayou Bridge employees and St. Martin Parish police officers acted unlawfully. They were willing to go as far as to break the law themselves to illegally arrest us. The refusal to prosecute us just proves what we already knew: these critical infrastructure laws are unconstitutional. We have the right to resist and we will not be deterred.”
LINK /
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:44 pm to ragincajun03
So we can randomly protest on private property with no repercussion now?
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:46 pm to ragincajun03
What a load of garbage. Those protestors are paid for by groups out in California and east coast and brought here to stir shite. Ridiculous
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:46 pm to ragincajun03
Soft on crime
It's a major reason we are where we are now.
It's a major reason we are where we are now.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:47 pm to Cosmo
quote:
So we can randomly protest on private property with no repercussion now?
Only for left wing causes.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:47 pm to Cosmo
quote:
So we can randomly protest on private property with no repercussion now?
Yes. Start with Bofill “Bo” Duhé's front lawn.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:48 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Companies like Energy Transfer Partners and the politicians that do their bidding are trying to deter us from defending our communities from the devastating impacts of new fossil fuel infrastructure,
The horror of jobs and cheap reliable energy to build and maintain important infrastructure like schools and hospitals.
quote:
We have the right to resist and we will not be deterred.”
Just because you're the loudest, doesn't mean you're right. Why should anyone listen to you and no one else who supports supports pipeline?
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:48 pm to Cosmo
Intredasting how left wing charges are always dropped and right wing charges are pursued with the fullest extent of the governmental apparatus.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:48 pm to Cosmo
quote:
So we can randomly protest on private property with no repercussion now?
The article says the some of the property owners whom ETC was crossing with the pipeline gave protesters permission.
What the Illuminator article doesn't state (Louisiana Illuminator is a very leftist outlet) is whether the courts had already granted ETC condemnation for that route across those tracts. If so, and if the protesters were within the workspace width, then I'd think they were trespassing.
But if condemnation had not yet been granted, then if they had permission from the property owners, then they had a right to be out there.
Would definitely be nice to get the full story and not just one side.
You also wonder if ETC asked the DA to drop the charges. In the end, ETC won and the Bucket Brigade lost.
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:53 pm to ragincajun03
Sounds like the arrests, even though the charges were eventually dropped, were effective enough to get the pipeline completed.
Shout-out to the protestors, they accomplished nothing.
Shout-out to the protestors, they accomplished nothing.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:55 pm to r0cky1
quote:
Those protestors are paid for by groups out in California and east coast and brought here to stir shite. Ridiculous
Pretty sure I found both Cindy Spoon & Sophia Cook-Phillips on FB
Cindy has posts of protests in TX & Sophia works in CA
y’all don’t want pics
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News