- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bret Weinstein now has 2 strikes against him on YouTube
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:07 pm
He is a brilliant scientist that dared to interview a prominent critical care physician about the possible benefits of Ivermectin. This doctor he interviewed is legit and not a hack. That caused strike 1.
His second strike was for saying he believes the evidence from other countries point to it likely being a good drug to use in the field with very little downside. Basically low risk, high reward.
I believe this is a major source of income for his family right now.
He is about to be canceled and it is an absolute fricking shame that we as a society are okay with silencing science that they don't like. It's not about him being right or wrong. It's about ostracizing scientists for deviating from the desired narrative.
LINK
His second strike was for saying he believes the evidence from other countries point to it likely being a good drug to use in the field with very little downside. Basically low risk, high reward.
I believe this is a major source of income for his family right now.
He is about to be canceled and it is an absolute fricking shame that we as a society are okay with silencing science that they don't like. It's not about him being right or wrong. It's about ostracizing scientists for deviating from the desired narrative.
LINK
14
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:12 pm to BeepNode
The dude shouldn’t be silenced over this kind of shite.
People who espouse the benefits of ivermectin for Covid should be able to freely discuss it while everyone else freely laughs at them.
People who espouse the benefits of ivermectin for Covid should be able to freely discuss it while everyone else freely laughs at them.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:12 pm to BeepNode
Terrible….He also was one of the first to call into the question the wet market theory of the rona virus. He is the first person I recall stating that it was probably a lab bred virus. Silencing a brilliant man like him is not good for the republic.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:13 pm to MTB
I’m so tired of big tech shutting down people they don’t agree with.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:15 pm to BeepNode
If there is anyone who knows how much bullshite there is in the world, it's Weinstein. frick YouTube. Authoritarian cock suckers.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:16 pm to slackster
quote:
People who espouse the benefits of ivermectin for Covid should be able to freely discuss it while everyone else freely laughs at them.
Exactly. It is bad enough that Google and Facebook think of themselves as arbitrators of truth, but what motivates them to suppress discussions about things they believe are incorrect? It seems awfully dystopian to me.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:17 pm to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
big tech
Simply an extension of our spy agencies. They aren't private companies by any stretch. They exist solely as an end-run around the 1st, 4th and 5th Amendments.
This post was edited on 6/16/21 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:20 pm to BeepNode
quote:
Exactly. It is bad enough that Google and Facebook think of themselves as arbitrators of truth, but what motivates them to suppress discussions about things they believe are incorrect? It seems awfully dystopian to me.
I can kind of sort of understand the flags and stuff they do, but the outright silencing of stuff is ridiculous.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:20 pm to slackster
quote:
People who espouse the benefits of ivermectin for Covid should be able to freely discuss it while everyone else freely laughs at them.
Haha, that dumbass thinks the world is round. Let him talk, just don't let him prove us wrong.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:21 pm to BeepNode
Did Big Tech not learn their lesson over censorship after this lab leak fiasco? Or the recent reports on HCQ?
No, of course not. Weinstein should find a new platform, YT doesn’t deserve good content
No, of course not. Weinstein should find a new platform, YT doesn’t deserve good content
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:22 pm to SCLibertarian
I know Roger Waters isn't very popular down here after his anti-trump laced concert in the Smoothie King Arena.
But even he is on board with the anti-censorship movement. This is a GREAT thing.
Yahoo News Roger Waters says frick you to Facebook
Rolling Stone Article about Waters telling Zuck to frick off
But even he is on board with the anti-censorship movement. This is a GREAT thing.
Yahoo News Roger Waters says frick you to Facebook
quote:
Waters went further by blasting Facebook's "insidious movement" to "take over absolutely everything," declaring he will "not be a party to this bulls---" while mockingly quoting from Zuckerberg's "missive" to him and blasting the Facebook boss as a "little prick." He made his comments at a pro-Julian Assange event, Rolling Stone reports.
"How the f--- did he get any power in anything?" Waters asked of Zuckerberg. "And yet here he is, one of the most powerful idiots in the world."
Rolling Stone Article about Waters telling Zuck to frick off
quote:
“How did this little prick who started out as ‘She’s pretty, we’ll give her a four out of five, she’s ugly, we’ll give her a four out of five,’ how did we give him any power?” Waters asked. “And yet here he is, one of the most powerful idiots in the world.”
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:24 pm to BeepNode
What's the dosage on Ivermectin for the China virus?
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:24 pm to slackster
quote:
People who espouse the benefits of ivermectin for Covid should be able to freely discuss it while everyone else freely laughs at them
I would love to hear your arguments against anything Dr. Kory's presented, but I'm not holding my breath.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:27 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Haha, that dumbass thinks the world is round. Let him talk, just don't let him prove us wrong.
, I don’t really give a damn about ivermectin one way or the other. The point remains that speech should be allowed and properly ridiculed if warranted, but not silenced. 
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:27 pm to slackster
quote:
while everyone else freely laughs at them.
I will take Bret’s opinion on science over the general populace’s opinion 8 days a week. Most people are too dumb to comprehend the consequences of sacrificing freedom for safety.
This post was edited on 6/16/21 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:29 pm to slackster
quote:
I don’t really give a damn about ivermectin one way or the other
Wait, so first you have enough conviction to say that people who have open minds about Ivermectin should be freely ridiculed, but now you're saying you don't care one way or the other?
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:32 pm to facher08
quote:
would love to hear your arguments against anything Dr. Kory's presented, but I'm not holding my breath.
Sigh. The point is that it doesn’t matter if this is about ivermectin, drinking bleach, or mRNA vaccines - silencing it is wrong. Let the people decide.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:33 pm to slackster
I think I’m leaning more and more in favor of decentralized internet on crypto rails in the form of dApps as being a huge part of the future of the internet as censorship becomes more and more of a problem. Like I know there is a dApp called DTube that claims to be a distributed version of YouTube.
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:33 pm to BeepNode
His podcast just had Robert Malone, the guy that literally invented mRNA vaccine technology to talk about the vaccine.
This fellow, ya know the guy that INVENTED mRNA VACCINE TECHNOLOGY, basically said it’s ok to discuss the dangers of this vaccine because it’s unlike anything else
They also talked about people being silenced over this. Looks like big tech fell right into the trap
This fellow, ya know the guy that INVENTED mRNA VACCINE TECHNOLOGY, basically said it’s ok to discuss the dangers of this vaccine because it’s unlike anything else
They also talked about people being silenced over this. Looks like big tech fell right into the trap
This post was edited on 6/16/21 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:34 pm to slackster
quote:
The point remains that speech should be allowed and properly ridiculed if warranted, but not silenced.
No one is denying his right to say anything. YouTube just doesn't care to host it on their platform.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News