Started By
Message

re: Bowe Bergdahl will be prosecuted for Desertion

Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by unclejhim
Folsom, La.
Member since Nov 2011
3703 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Does he deserve death, no.

Would you care to explain your reasoning?
I don't think he will get the death penalty, hell I'm not sure he'll be Court Martialed. If the facts show he deserted his post and collaborated with the enemy, then hang his arse. Some of his own died looking for him.
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
11709 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:02 pm to
Cant believe we gave the people that had him 5 people for him..
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:04 pm
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

If the facts show he deserted his post


they do

quote:

collaborated with the enemy


he didnt
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48709 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:05 pm to
The article says that no charges have been preferred.

The article says nothing about him being "prosecuted" for anything.

At this point in time, these questions remain unanswered.

Did I miss something, or is the statement that he "will be prosecuted for Desertion" premature at this time?
Posted by Scream4LSU
Member since Sep 2007
991 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:16 pm to
Not sure what article you are looking at but the phrase "desertion charges" kinda lets you know that. Unless at some point those charges are dropped is it a stretch to say he will be prosecuted?
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:17 pm
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48709 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:19 pm to
I don't see anywhere in the article where it says that any charges have been preferred.

IF charges were preferred, they would be talking about the charges on the news -- I mean the specific charges citing specific criminal statutes.

The headline of the article is misleading. A careful review of the body of the article leads one to conclude that no charges are preferred at this time.

It's not the OP's fault that the headline is misleading.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:20 pm
Posted by ALT F4
Member since Jan 2015
2292 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:20 pm to
Bowe knows desertion
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30549 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:25 pm to
The Army will buckle on this if Obama is against it. The decision-makers in the Army care about one thing - getting their next star. And that means currying favor on Capitol Hill and 1600 Pennsylvania. I'll be surprised if this ever comes to anything.
Posted by Scream4LSU
Member since Sep 2007
991 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:27 pm to
It won't be a statute it will be an Article 85 under UCMJ.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58419 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:30 pm to
I don't think he deserves the death penalty because he didn't collaborate with the enemy directly causing deaths of American soldiers. While his actions ended up causing the loss of life, I don't think that was his intent. I compare it to negligent homicide and first degree murder.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:31 pm
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9483 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:41 pm to
Weren't there reports that he'd mailed home personal items shortly before his disappearance? Didn't he ask his squad leader or platoon sergeant what would happen if he went outside the wire without his weapon and Kevlar? It all sounded pre-planned, if not necessarily well thought out, to me. That's desertion in my book.

On the other hand, based on media reports (and that's all most of us have to rely on, so save the "liberal MSM" bullshite), he was basically a model citizen growing up. Nobody had a bad word to say about him.

This guy might be a nutcase or maybe on drugs, but it sounds like he willingly abandoned his post and put his teammates at risk. He deserves to be held accountable for his actions, but should receive consideration for any mitigating circumstances in his defense.
Posted by DthVllyDud
Ameritopia
Member since Jan 2011
1365 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:44 pm to
Can we get the 5 terrorists back that we traded for this POS?

Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48709 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:44 pm to
Article 85 is a criminal statute, right?

If he were charged under Article 85, the news would state that.

If you can find something somewhere indicating that anybody's been charged under Article 85, please post. Things may be moving fast on this matter. More concrete info could break at any time, seems to me.

Thanks.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:57 pm
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48709 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Can we get the 5 terrorists back that we traded for this POS?




Heck no. The Obama Admin is letting terrorists go left and right.

Hillary says we need to respect them, so, I guess she will continue the trend.
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
53641 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Death penalty? Not sure, would need to see all the facts.


only way he deserves death penalty is if his abandoning post directly lead to the death of another soldier. I do not know the story but if that is the case he absolutely deserves death
Posted by Scream4LSU
Member since Sep 2007
991 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

only way he deserves death penalty is if his abandoning post directly lead to the death of another soldier.


This is 100% what happened. Unit thought he was captured outside the compound while either on guard duty or something so put together several operations to locate and rescue him resulting in several deaths and several wounded. There were several indicators there was premeditation on leaving. Left all his equipment and had been having exploratory conversations with fellow soldiers on some "What If" scenarios of taking equipment and leaving.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 1:55 pm
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37280 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

The article says that no charges have been preferred.

Did I miss something, or is the statement that he "will be prosecuted for Desertion" premature at this time?


The article states that "army sources" have said he will be tried for desertion. At this point that's all you're going to get until he's actually charged.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43369 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 1:59 pm to
Well, US lives were lost trying to free him. I guess that puts him in a pretty bad spot.
Posted by artompkins
Orange Beach, Al
Member since May 2010
5623 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 2:21 pm to
I can't believe we actually traded prisoners for this dirt bag. I thought we never negotiated with terrorists. That's what we keep saying everytime someone gets imprisoned in North Korea or snatched up by Isis.
Posted by unclejhim
Folsom, La.
Member since Nov 2011
3703 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

he didnt

You know this to be true??
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram