- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis; person shot was allegedly armed
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:49 am to dawgfan24348
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:49 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
You're just assuming he had a gun, did he? Can't tell from here but you want it to be true so you can continue to defend the government that already murdered someone
You're just assuming he didn't have a gun? Can't tell from here but you want it to be true so you can continue to accuse the government of murdering someone.
Fixed that for you
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:50 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
She didn't but please continue to simp for big daddy government
She did, and I don’t care about “big daddy govt”
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:50 am to Proximo
You circled a grainy close up congrats
If the other angle shows him pulling the gun then fine but so far no strong evidence suggests so
If the other angle shows him pulling the gun then fine but so far no strong evidence suggests so
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:51 am to dawgfan24348
It doesn’t matter whether it’s grainy or not. You can see him huddled up in his waistband, officers notice and start hitting him/back away and an object falls from his hand as he’s shot
That is strong evidence they were correct to shoot him
That is strong evidence they were correct to shoot him
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:51 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
said she attempted to ram the officers which she didn't, and said she hit someone which she didn't
How can you continue to be so factually incorrect when there are multiple videos from multiple angles clearing showing your claims aren't true?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:51 am to Mushroom1968
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 10:52 am
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:52 am to dawgfan24348
Look to me that the suspect fired the first shot. The agent who shot him didn't have his weapon pulled when the first shot was fired,
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:52 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
The punishment for resisting arrest isn't being fricking killed
You’re wasting time man, they had their minds made up already. Bottom line is that most of them want government agents to kill people they disagree with / don’t like, so they have 0 skepticism about any self-serving official narrative that justifies any agent killing a perceived / assumed leftist.
I think anyone being objective will say that we need more angles, and that there’s no way to tell from the one distantly-shot video whether this was justified or not. But you’re not talking to objective thinkers, you’re talking to people who wish every liberal suffered the same fate, so it’s truly pointless.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:52 am to Smeg
But of projection here
Not to mention DHS code also stated that they're not allowed to be in front of a vehicle that's on for that exact reason
Not to mention DHS code also stated that they're not allowed to be in front of a vehicle that's on for that exact reason
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:52 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Oh so that video didn't show her turning her wheels?
She spun the tires directly at him then turned as she was being shot. The ice/wet road prevented her from running over him. There is super slow motion video showing all that in detail.
You just choose not to believe it because it doesn’t fit your narrative.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:53 am to dawgfan24348
Still harping about some purple haired lady from a different video because you’re an idiot.
It’s only about your ideology, not analyzing what is happening in the moment that causes these shootings
It’s only about your ideology, not analyzing what is happening in the moment that causes these shootings
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:53 am to loogaroo
No she didn't she turned her wheels away from him Jesus frick dude
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:54 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Oh so that video didn't show her turning her wheels?
Dude, stop. The officer had no way of knowing which direction her wheels were pointing. A vehicle is a deadly weapon and when she accelerated he was well within his rights to use lethal force.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:54 am to Proximo
I already said the evidence in the OP video isn't conclusive to anything yet but I also said it doesn't look good nor is DHS to be trusted
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:55 am to Rex Feral
Dude you stop he shouldn't have been in front of the vehicle in the first place and two he was already to her side by the time he fired off a round.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:56 am to The Pirate King
Loving the “Christian” comments!
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:56 am to Rex Feral
quote:
Dude, stop. The officer had no way of knowing which direction her wheels were pointing. A vehicle is a deadly weapon and when she accelerated he was well within his rights to use lethal force.
This. Two people wouldn’t be shot if they had followed orders.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:59 am to The Pirate King
Walz’s fault
The clown waged a distraction from his fraud
The clown waged a distraction from his fraud
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:59 am to OKBoomerSooner
quote:
Bottom line is that most of them want government agents to kill people they disagree with / don’t like
This board is very left leaning anti MAGA so I’m not surprised this is how it is
Posted on 1/24/26 at 11:00 am to loogaroo
Classic republicans only care about small government when it suits them. At least libertarians have a spine
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 11:00 am
Popular
Back to top


0






