Started By
Message

re: Baws, as of 1/1/25 your Netflix subscription will be subject to sales tax

Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62354 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Consumption taxes are never good for encouraging economic activity.


Income taxes are good for encouraging economic activity?

I'd say no taxes are good for economic activity, but that's not really the discussion we're having here is it?
This post was edited on 12/12/24 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36367 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

The only people who will be "worse off" are the ones who are paying literally nothing in income taxes now.


This isn’t true. The State, who wants to sell you sunshine and roses because it’s their proposal, doesn’t even say this
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12415 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

imjustafatkid
it’s amusing how wrong you are and don’t even realize it.

And I don’t like mingo as a poster. But he isn’t wrong on this topic. People downvoting him doesn’t change that
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
5785 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:53 pm to
They already took money out of the new bridge fund to make up the deficit from cutting income tax.

I still can’t believe people thought Jeff was the best choice. Like fricking mind boggling.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36367 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Income taxes are good for encouraging economic activity?


You’re conflating two different things

quote:

I'd say no taxes are good for economic activity


The taxation is theft corner is one of the lowest IQ corners of the internet. How do you plan to sell your goods and services with no infrastructure?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62354 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

it’s amusing how wrong you are and don’t even realize it.


Except for the reality that I'm not wrong. Consumption taxes are better than compulsory taxes. In every instance. Always.

There is no legitimate argument otherwise. State confiscation is always worse than the alternative.
This post was edited on 12/12/24 at 2:55 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56809 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

but you make less income because people are consuming less of your goods.


Doesn't work that way in my industry.

And the "if you want to pay less taxes buy less shite" is a solution to your sky screaming. Some people may spend less, some people may spend more, some people may not change. It's really up to the individual. Which is the beauty of it. Personal choice is much better than mandated government edicts, don't you think, mr. "fiscal conservative"?

quote:

You still make more money for every dollar you earn. Are taxes too high due to unencumbered government spending? OF COURSE. But that’s not a reason to make yourself worse off


You keep repeating this trope, though these past couple years with record inflation, spending didnt' really slow down any. And if my spending tax expenses outweights my income tax savings, then maybe i should stop spending so much? This isn't a hard problem.

This boils down to simple personal responsibility. You want your choice removed in favor of the government making those choices for you. You sound like a Democrat.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
73493 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

I still can’t believe people thought Jeff was the best choice. Like fricking mind boggling.


who was a better choice?

Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36367 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

And the "if you want to pay less taxes buy less shite" is a solution


Said another way, make yourself worse off to pay the same amount
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
5785 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:59 pm to
There were several. Jeff was the worst Republican candidate.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12415 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 2:59 pm to
You said if people bought the exact same goods as the prior year they wouldn’t pay more in taxes. That is inherently false.

You also couldn’t understand his point on how increasing inflation with a consumption tax results in an increased tax burden for individuals
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62354 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

You’re conflating two different things


Nope, the other poster did that.

quote:

The taxation is theft corner is one of the lowest IQ corners of the internet.


It's simply reality. The debate is about how much, and what type of, theft you agree with.

And the people who founded this great nation of ours would absolutely disagree with you about the nature of taxation, especially when it comes to income taxes, and were all much smarter than you.

quote:

How do you plan to sell your goods and services with no infrastructure?


Why do you believe government is the only entity that can build out infrastructure?
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12415 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

who was a better choice?
Wags or Schroeder
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56809 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

The taxation is theft corner is one of the lowest IQ corners of the internet. How do you plan to sell your goods and services with no infrastructure?


You must love it when the pentagon can't account for $824 billion of taxpayer dollars.

It's always the nanny state types that want to be taxed harder. And it's usually those that do not pay income taxes, and when the fact that 48% of the general public does not pay income taxes they say, "but we pay sales tax". Yes, you do. And now you get to pay more, while i get to pay less. Enjoy your choices. Let your actions work for you. Stop being a slave to consumerism if you are so concerned with sales tax. It's that simple.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62354 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

You said if people bought the exact same goods as the prior year they wouldn’t pay more in taxes. That is inherently false.


I never said anything of the sort.

quote:

You also couldn’t understand his point on how increasing inflation with a consumption tax results in an increased tax burden for individuals


Increasing inflation increases tax burden regardless. His point is nonsensical.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36367 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

And the people who founded this great nation of ours would absolutely disagree with you about the nature of taxation, especially when it comes to income taxes, and were all much smarter than you.


They also barely left their homestead and didn’t allow women or minorities to own land. We are playing under a different set of rules.

Who the hell knows what they would think. It’s literally impossible to know
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56809 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Said another way, make yourself worse off to pay the same amount


There it is. You think things decide your self worth. You are just upset that you are shackled to your spending. I enjoy things to, from time to time. I also know how to budget and what to cut out when shite like inflation started rearing it's head. If you are upset over the extra $2 over netflix, unsubscribe to netflix.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12415 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

There is no legitimate argument otherwise. State confiscation is always worse than the alternative.
we are discussing which tax system results in a lower overall tax burden for the average individual. Not which system is morally superior.

You are conflating the two.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62354 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

They also barely left their homestead and didn’t allow women or minorities to own land. We are playing under a different set of rules.

Who the hell knows what they would think. It’s literally impossible to know




This is as close as someone can get to admitting he can't argue his point without outright saying it.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40158 posts
Posted on 12/12/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Consumption taxes are better than compulsory taxes. In every instance. Always. There is no legitimate argument otherwise. State confiscation is always worse than the alternative.


If Louisiana dropped ALL income and property taxes in favor of a 25% sales tax, how far away from a neighboring state would you have to be for you to buy that new fridge in Louisiana?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram