- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At COP26, John Bel Edwards tries to position Louisiana as a magnet for clean energy
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:12 pm to michael corleone
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:12 pm to michael corleone
quote:
Solar farm has a one time construction Bubbjle , then zero permanent jobs outside of cutting grass. A power plant , oil well, oil rig creates not only construction jobs, but perm operator positions and servicing positions.
Without addressing the issue of whether or not solar is a better source of energy for consumers than traditional fuels, you are essentially committing to a Broken Windows fallacy in that your focus would be on the labor value of the energy source.
Henry Hazlitt might would argue that if solar is a better source of energy on its own terms, it wouldn’t matter if jobs were lost in the transition to the new technology because labor tied up in inefficient production is not good for society as a whole.
0
Posted on 11/1/21 at 5:31 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
They want to be known as energy companies because the market is demanding cleaner energy going forward,
Wrong
The market is demanding cheap reliable energy
These companies are being held hostage by the government and radical activists
Posted on 11/1/21 at 5:34 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
"I’m going to Glasgow in order to concur with world leaders,
Translation: I have aspirations of one day being Senator John Bel Edwards, and I have to go to Scotland to suck the right globalist dicks. Plus, it’s a taxpayer-funded vacay, so why not?
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 11/1/21 at 5:42 pm to ragincajun03
I don’t like JBE, but it’s a prudent move considering what the price of oil is about to do. Hell, it’s already started.
Posted on 11/1/21 at 6:25 pm to Bulletproof Lover
Iberiabank, Smoothie King. Oil and Gas the latest target for JBE in his bid to rid Louisiana of any economic strength it has remaining.
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 11/1/21 at 6:37 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Even oil and gas companies - I don’t care which one you look at; it might be BP or Shell or Exxon - you can see that they are quickly rebranding. They don’t want to be known as oil and gas companies anymore. They want to be known as energy companies because the market is demanding cleaner energy going forward, and so they’re participating in this transition as well.”
no not really. they will continue to produce o&g and the endless needs of petrochemicals necessary for the next century. but sure, they also would loooove to also provide “clean energy” to tap into that potential gold mine of a market. and who are you to speak on their behalf anyhow you fricking nitwit? The execs of these companies wouldn’t allow you into a boardroom with them without rolling their eyes and laughing at you behind your back.
quote:
“I don’t believe the state of Louisiana can afford to be more pro-oil and gas than the oil and gas companies
unless you plan on going all in on tourism as your one and only industry, that’s not remotely true either. and good luck with that. Louisiana is NOTHING without O&G.
All and All.
You burned a ton of carbons and tax payer money flying on a private jet to run your mouth about the oil and gas industry and clean energy, neither of which know anything about and you’re making unobtainable promises you won’t fulfill without authoritarian measures.
sounds exactly like a Democrat. makes sense
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 11/1/21 at 6:39 pm to Bulletproof Lover
quote:
I don’t like JBE, but it’s a prudent move considering what the price of oil is about to do. Hell, it’s already started.
because of Democrat policies…
yeah, we should totally trust them to solve the problem they caused by failing at trying to solve another problem! no holes in that logic at all!
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 11/1/21 at 6:41 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
no not really. and who are you to speak on their behalf you nitwit?
It takes a special kind of arrogance to talk like that about an industry that endorsed and donated to his opponents.
But that's to be expected with him as he is every bit of the tyrannical control freak his actions over the last two years have shown him as.
Posted on 11/1/21 at 7:55 pm to ragincajun03
This dude ever been to Houma?
Posted on 11/1/21 at 8:10 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
waning days of the globe's carbon-based energy economy.
it's so neat how they think china, russia and india will just follow along.
OR...maybe...this whole plan is to impoverish western civilization since we're the only one's who've ever stood up to anything.
Posted on 11/1/21 at 8:28 pm to dandyjohn
quote:
carbon pollution
Quit breathing retard
Posted on 11/9/21 at 2:57 pm to michael corleone
quote:
Solar farm has a one time construction Bubbjle , then zero permanent jobs outside of cutting grass. A power plant , oil well, oil rig creates not only construction jobs, but perm operator positions and servicing positions.
By your own statement, you’re admitting that the generation cost of the energy will be higher due to overhead of long term labor/sustainability projects but are fine with it because wit won’t interfere with traditionally accepted methods of energy generation/distribution. I thought the baws were all about the free market? Why is it bad when a new energy source enters the market? Isn’t that good for the consumer?
Nobody’s advocating (save absolute dipshits) for a complete replacement of FF with GE. That’s asinine but there’s room in the market for another provider. Also, as BilJ pointed out, there’s lots of moving parts behind this level of build. Energy firms, Engineers, Attorneys, Land Surveyors, Contractors, Monitoring Personnel, O&M contractors, and even insurance companies will get business off of a major build.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 4:12 pm to ragincajun03
I'll reiterate what needs to be said over and over again:
frick THAT SLIMY COCK SUCKER
frick THAT SLIMY COCK SUCKER
Posted on 11/9/21 at 4:33 pm to Tshiz
quote:
Investing in Net Zero: Overcoming the Challenges for Sustainable Finance and the Road to COP26."
Someone should ask how she plans to
Overcome the challenges of shootings on interstates ?
That seems like a much higher issue
Posted on 11/9/21 at 4:49 pm to eddieray
How dare he!, blah blah blah gif
Posted on 11/9/21 at 5:28 pm to ragincajun03
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/12/21 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 11/9/21 at 5:35 pm to ragincajun03
frick that choade
Posted on 11/9/21 at 5:39 pm to YouAre8Up
You’ve got that backwards. JBE told Exxon to frick off and take their new plant to Texas, so they did. Over $8 BILLION invested, 12,000 construction jobs, and 6000 permanent jobs. He told us he had enough petrochemical plants and didn’t need anymore.
My loathing for him is without bounds.
My loathing for him is without bounds.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 5:44 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
waning days of the globe's carbon-based energy economy
Ready to live like peasants while the elite rule with an iron fist?
By the way, their lives will be completely unchanged. They don't want a class system. They want a caste system.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 5:45 pm to dandyjohn
quote:
The sooner you deal with that, the sooner you realize the rest of the world ain't gonna by one fricking thing from us if we don't do something about carbon pollution, the sooner this state might actually be a nice place to live.
Yeah, that’s surely why the Chinese are having issues being a net exporter to, ya know, the whole fricking world.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News