- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:27 pm to Byron Bojangles III
I can't feel too bad for a thug that robs a BK at gunpoint!
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:27 pm to boom roasted
quote:
What about 10 years on a 13 year sentence?
I would think there would be less of an argument to keep this guy out of prison.
But you're right, this really wouldn't set any precedents. In fact, the article states the precedent was set back in 1912...the convicted was set free.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:28 pm to medtiger
quote:
I was trying to understand your reasoning in the two threads about criminals today
Well considering you don't have my stance right, you should either re-read the first thread, or just stop trying to bring it up here.
quote:
And, fwiw, I wasn't the one initiating personal attacks in this thread.
I haven't said anything about you, and you have plenty to say about me.
Again, if you want to talk about this, stop doing it in this thread.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:28 pm to medtiger
quote:You have to admit, he's made it awfully fricking confusing. One might be led to believe that he was somewhat "insincere" in one of the threads.
'm not trying to make people laugh with me. I was trying to understand your reasoning in the two threads about criminals today.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:28 pm to Byron Bojangles III
It's nearly a no brainer that he should be free.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:29 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
You have to admit, he's made it awfully fricking confusing. One might be led to believe that he was somewhat "insincere" in one of the threads.
How about yall 3 go make a hate on LNCHBOX circle jerk thread and keep all your bullshite in there?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:30 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
*bb gunpoint
If I got away from the scene and they caught me later I would also say I used a BB gun
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:31 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
One might be led to believe that he was somewhat "insincere" in one of the threads.
I did call him a troll in the other thread, but then he kept going; so he either did a super job at trolling, or he was really serious.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:32 pm to medtiger
quote:
I did call him a troll in the other thread, but then he kept going; so he either did a super job at trolling, or he was really serious.
Do I need to just go ahead and make the thread for yall?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:32 pm to medtiger
quote:We have zero facts on that case.
In fact, the article states the precedent was set back in 1912...the convicted was set free.
The best way to handle this is for the governor to pardon the defendant. Going to court and getting any sort of judgment, etc. could lead to a precedent being set. Any precedent with a bright line rule could be used to the detriment of the accused, not to their benefit.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:33 pm to boom roasted
quote:
We have zero facts on that case.
The best way to handle this is for the governor to pardon the defendant. Going to court and getting any sort of judgment, etc. could lead to a precedent being set. Any precedent with a bright line rule could be used to the detriment of the accused, not to their benefit.
Be careful, that viewpoint apparently gets you labelled as idiot and troll.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:35 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Be careful, that viewpoint apparently gets you labelled as idiot and troll.
Don't try to pretend like this was your stance. You're being labeled a idiot because you're posts indicate that that is the case.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:36 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
Don't try to pretend like this was your stance.
Yea, there is no way that I said that earlier in the thread or anything. If only there was a way to view old posts.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:38 pm to boom roasted
im amazed that there isnt any standard on the books already regarding a timeframe between verdict and initiating the penalty....
"we sentence you to one year at a time of our choosing" could be a pretty ominous thing to have looming over you.
"we sentence you to one year at a time of our choosing" could be a pretty ominous thing to have looming over you.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:39 pm to NoSaint
quote:There might be after this. I skimmed our statutes and didn't see anything addressing this. I didn't look very hard though.
im amazed that there isnt any standard on the books already regarding a timeframe between verdict and initiating the penalty....
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:42 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I read this this morning. Hard to believe the state of Missouri could be so stupid. The guy turns his life around and he's ordered to prison to serve 13 years for a crime he committed 14 years ago - simply because they forgot about him.
Prison industry wants it's pound of flesh (and the cash they'll get to keep him locked up)
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:46 pm to SuperSoakher
quote:
The big problem that I see here now is that you're not just punishing one person anymore. Now you're punishing his daughter and wife who weren't in the picture 14 years ago. Now three people have to suffer for Missouri's frick up rather than just the guy.
Not to mention taking a productive member of society off the streets and making him the tax payers responsibility.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:48 pm to Byron Bojangles III
There is no end to the stupidity government is capable of. A judge or governor with balls and common sense would release him.
Popular
Back to top



0



