Started By
Message

re: Are higher than normal COVID antibodies good or bad?

Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35846 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I suppose I should ask you what you mean by “in the context of this vaccine.”


This part is debatable and more likely just not true for most people

quote:

getting a vaccine is better than not getting a vaccine
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:10 pm to
You use nebulous terms that don’t support your points. You have opinions but don’t expound upon them with anything more than a figurative, “I just know, believe me.” I don’t know how to respond to that.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:17 pm to
Yeah extremely high levels would be a sign of recent infection if anything.
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5550 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

However, getting a vaccine is better than not getting a vaccine because it will offer at least a modicum of protection and symptoms will be less severe.


Please go get your 9th mRNA booster just to prove me wrong.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Please go get your 9th mRNA booster just to prove me wrong


I have no interest in proving anything to you. I will say that mRNA is a revolution in medical technology, not just with vaccinations. Promising research is in the human stage trials for using mRNA against cancers.

mRNA is a type of single-stranded RNA involved in protein synthesis. It can be used in cancer research to develop personalized cancer vaccines and as a therapeutic approach to stimulate the immune system to target and destroy cancer cells. mRNA technology allows for the creation of vaccines that instruct cells to produce specific proteins that can trigger an immune response against cancer cells.
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5550 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

I will say that mRNA is a revolution in medical technology,


I agree, and in the right setting like Cancer Clinical Trials it (mRNA) could be a game changer. However, it was not meant to be mandated against healthy, working people's jobs and children. Stolen elections have consequences, crazy none of you vaxx nazis can put 2 and 2 together and call a spade a spade.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43766 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:58 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


In my professional medical opinion this test is a joke and just a way for labcorp to make money. Also I would not be surprised if Dr Bowden received compensation from labcorp for that post.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

I agree, and in the right setting like Cancer Clinical Trials it (mRNA) could be a game changer. However, it was not meant to be mandated against healthy, working people's jobs and children. Stolen elections have consequences, crazy none of you vaxx nazis can put 2 and 2 together and call a spade a spade.


mRNA is completely safe. It completely vanishes after it has given its message to a cell. The cells of your body are using it even as we speak to produce proteins and other benefits for your body, and to communicate with other cells. Did you know that cells communicate all across your body? Mind blowing!

You were not mandated to take any covid vaccine.

Stolen elections? There were no stolen elections.

Vaxx Nazis? Again, you don’t have to take any vaccines, anti-vaxxer.
Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5550 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

mRNA is completely safe.
quote:

You were not mandated to take any covid vaccine.


Okay, you are an out of touch clown. That didn't take long to prove you're a clinical retard <75.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Sweden did a great job

They still experienced 18,500 excess deaths in 2020

That would be 620,000 excess deaths adjusted for US population. So in line with US excess deaths (Sweden actually had more…..). Hard to blame lockdowns for the excess deaths then right? Why not just accept the fact that yes the govt fricked up, but also yes Covid killed alot of people FROM COVID not just WITH


I was asking a question if Sweden did better than the rest of the civilized nations. I did not assert it.

Lockdowns or not, the number of deaths would have likely been the same with one caveat. I would hypothesize the curve would have been slightly steeper with no lockdowns but we would have been out of the pandemic phase quicker.

quote:

Why not just accept the fact that yes the govt fricked up, but also yes Covid killed alot of people FROM COVID not just WITH


I'm fine with that. But I still get to participate in pureblood threads.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:09 pm to
So you’ll laughbut not say why mRNA is not safe? That’s retarded.

You’ll laugh but won’t say who forced you to take the vaccine?

Just going around laughing without saying anything is an example of retardation.

ETA: And I just noticed your avatar.
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35846 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

So you’ll laughbut not say why mRNA is not safe? That’s retarded. You’ll laugh but won’t say who forced you to take the vaccine?


You can’t explain anything to someone this clueless
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Also I would not be surprised if Dr Bowden received compensation from labcorp for that post.


If it was determined that she is being paid by LabCorp for that post and she is stating, "No one is paying me to say this."; would this be an ethical violation according to the Texas Medical Board?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

mRNA is completely safe.


I'm definitely going to scrutinize the application of mRNA via a risk/reward evaluation a lot more than other proven medical technologies.

I don't believe the technology is to the point where the mRNA can be guaranteed to target and migrate across non critical cell membranes. An immune response in deltoid muscle cells are fine. Immune responses in cardiac cells, not so much.

Until they can get the technology such that I don't develop an immune response from critical organ cells I'm going to be really hesitant to use mRNA technology.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:31 pm to
You’ll no doubt be relieved to know that mRNA does not enter all cells. When introduced into the body, mRNA primarily enters the cells in the area where it is administered, such as muscle cells in the case of mRNA vaccines. It does not distribute throughout the entire body to all cell types. Specifically, mRNA from vaccines does not enter the nucleus of cells and does not alter DNA.
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:38 pm to
I prefer the total absence of Wuhan Flu antibodies like my current condition.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

When introduced into the body, mRNA primarily enters the cells in the area where it is administered, such as muscle cells in the case of mRNA vaccines. It does not distribute throughout the entire body to all cell types.


Right, I know the intent. That's why old people with poor circulatory systems are at a much lower risk of getting myocarditis, pericarditis or any other type of unwanted immune response. People with poor circulatory systems have a good chance of keeping the mRNA in the injection site area and developing an immune response from the deltoid muscles cells. I mean, it's just a little swelling and aggravation at the injection site after the shot. But if the mRNA escapes the injection site area which is more probable in younger people with good circulatory systems the mRNA can set up shop in cells that make up vital organs. Getting an immune response from cells that make up a vital organ is not ideal.
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7637 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:48 pm to
Antibodies naturally get destroyed.
T cells are indictive of long term immunity.

This "Dr" needs to go back to undergrad.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Antibodies naturally get destroyed.
T cells are indictive of long term immunity.


I think she is implying that the antibodies should be decreasing and they are not because the mRNA may still be active or there was some type of genetic modification and now these patients are producing the spiked protein on the regular.

Posted by Tomatocantender
Boot
Member since Jun 2021
5550 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

some type of genetic modification and now these patients are producing the spiked protein on the regular.


Welcome to the year 2021. This was stated ad nauseum on the OT and Poli Boards in 2021. That was 4 years ago. My God, I feel like this is the Brawndo stage of Idiocracy with some of you slow pokes. We literally have an idiot ITT that is denying there ever was a Covid vax mandate.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram