Started By
Message

re: Anyone receive a notice from La Dept of Public Safety about their car insurance?

Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5086 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66205 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:37 pm to
Hope this story gets more traction. I bet it will. These dipshits need to be exposed for this nonsense.
Posted by weadjust
Member since Aug 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:44 pm to
Louisiana state police, Colonel Mike Edmonson says the letter is legitimate and that the state recently sent out 1 million letters in an effort to recoup millions of dollars

Damn that's a lot of letters.
Posted by tigerzballzdeep
Rockwall, TX
Member since Jun 2007
3101 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:51 pm to
Got one that is dated back to 2002, sent to my folks house. What if no one was there to receive it?

I can't believe they are going back 13 years on this shite! Louisiana DMV and gov't has to be the worst POS in the country. I don't regret growing up there but I would never move back to that worthless state. Dick move.
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5086 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 12:54 pm to
Yeah me and the SO have discussed a move after she graduates. It's getting closer and closer.

I'm almost at the point of moving out of country.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23274 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

What if no one was there to receive it?

federal tax refund gets garnished for $576.
Posted by FargoReb
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2015
6 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:05 pm to
You have to just keep trying them on the phone. Try early in the morning or very late in the afternoon. This happened to me after I moved to Minnesota, but I sent in proof of insurance coverage to new state and they cleared the record once I was able to talk to a person.
Posted by Creamer
louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
2817 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:11 pm to
What exactly would the state have to prove if disputed? That plates were never turned in or that some sort of notice was sent?
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:20 pm to
Louisiana state police, Colonel Mike Edmonson says the letter is legitimate and that the state recently sent out 1 million letters in an effort to recoup millions of dollars
-----------------------------------------------------------
The population of LA was estimated to be 4.65 million by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2014. I'm not sure of the age distribution, but let's say that 15% (a conservative estimate, I think) are too young to even have a Driver's License. That means that of the ~3.95 million residents over age 16 (plus how ever many vehicle owning residents had the good sense to get in their car and drive...) about 1 in 4 has violated this law.

I understand fining people for not having liability insurance. However, being fined for not responding to a letter that was never received (if even ever sent) smells like total bullshite to me.
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6342 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

That plates were never turned in or that some sort of notice was sent?


At the very the least the latter.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
130622 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:36 pm to
The only thing this is is a money grab. We should give jindal the Mussolini treatment.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3215 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

The only thing this is is a money grab.


People are required to report back to the OMV that they moved to another state, sold their car, etc. This is the case in every U.S. state, so their various automotive fees are paid in full.

Sounds like a lot of people in this thread didn't report/pay what they were supposed to the OMV and are mad that the state is doing the right thing in keeping its collections up-to-date.

I wish my state (Alabama) would actually try to collect all of its outstanding fines from the non-contributors of society instead of raising the taxes on those who actually do pay regularly. Louisiana, I salute you.
Posted by proudertider
mandeville
Member since Sep 2009
277 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 2:04 pm to
Shitstatistsay.

You're just as moronic as politicians and their department sycophants if you really mean what you just wrote.

This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 2:05 pm
Posted by BigB0882
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5382 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 2:16 pm to
This has got to cause a huge mess. They can't be sending out notices 3 at a time saying 1st notice, 2nd notice, 3rd notice. That isn't legal. They also can't prove they ever sent out anything to begin with because they didn't. They need to find a way to go after the people who actually broke the law but forget the past due charges they are trying to hit everyone with for supposedly not responding to some invisible letter. We never broke a law nor got a past notice. Yet if they refuse to budge they are just taking money from my federal refund? I promise you there will be a huge class action lawsuit. I may be contacting a lawyer this week if I can't get them on the phone and get them to back off.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8264 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 3:32 pm to
So is it a fine for not responding to letter they say they sent over a decade ago or for anytime you cannot prove you owned car without insurance or both?

There seems to be two time frames mentioning $525 - one for 91 days or more non-compliant (not sure if with insurance or original Letter) and later a mention of fee/fine going to $525 plus 25% collection fee if you don't respond to new letter in 60 days.

The dealer, when getting title, mailed in plates, and I never received older letter nor did anyone at previous address. Particular Dealership and car brand no longer exist. I am sure owner is still around somewhere else, but I don't know time frame this kind of paperwork had to be kept.

It does seem like over a decade later they could include original letter. It really seems like they could have sent first and second notice back closer to trade in, so I could have asked dealer and still have original paperwork sitting around.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 4:12 pm
Posted by txtiger79
Member since Oct 2007
1016 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 4:17 pm to
I did some more research on this. The Office of Debt Recovery was formed in the past couple years by Tim Barfield (Jindal's tax guy and former Shaw Group exec) to go after old fees/debts due state agencies. If an agency has a debt that is 60 days old, they can submit the debt to the ODR for collection. It appears the ODR has very broad sweeping rights in going after the debt. See here for the state law creating/authorizing the entity. The end of that legislation states the ODR can utilize the Dept. of Treasury's offset program, which can in fact garnish federal tax refunds.

It looks like, generally speaking, Louisiana has a 10 year statute of limitations on old debt (credit card debt is 3 years). However, it is unclear whether that limitation applies at all to debts owed to the government and whether that limitation would be from the time of the "violation" or from the time Louisiana calls it a debt. I did see one article quoting Barfield that said many of the state's debts are uncollectible at this point, so the state shouldn't expect hundreds of millions to pour in. In fact, the office only has 8-10 people working in it if the article I found is accurate.

Also, apparently the police pay raise that someone in the thread mentioned earlier was specifically approved because the ODR was to go after these old license violations to collect money to pay for it.

Where this gets a bit murky (as if not murky enough) is that many of these letters are going to old addresses. One of the requirements of the federal offset program is that the reporting agency must provide you with notices and provide an opportunity to resolve the debt. The fact that they are not using registered/certified mail or even getting current addresses seems like this would be very hard to ultimately enforce. That being said, they can make it a complete pain in the arse even if the law isn't ultimately on their side. My guess is they have carpet bombed everyone with a violation with the hope that some pay up without much fuss. I can't imagine they will send 1 million requests to the feds for offset with the shoddy evidence trail they are trying to concoct.
Posted by gingerkittie
Member since Aug 2013
2675 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 5:03 pm to
I received quite a few of these for vehicles i KNOW I turned the plate in on. The last one I turned the plate in on, I asked for a receipt or paperwork indicating they got it and they said they didn't give out proof like that.

So anyway, they want the full $525 on multiple vehicles. Well screw them. I haven't driven for years (medical reasons - I pass out unexpectedly). So they can't take my licenses. Nor can they take my refund because I make sure I have no refund due from the state or the feds.

So, what next, lol?
Posted by doublecutter
Member since Oct 2003
6888 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 5:13 pm to
Consider how many people they could go after if they concentrated on SE parishes at end of 2005 and beginning of 2006. Thousands of cars were destroyed in Katrina. I know my car that sat in 8 feet of flooding was towed away by my insurance company while I was living and working in California. Didn't turn in any plate.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23274 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

people they could go after if they concentrated on SE parishes at end of 2005 and beginning of 2006. Thousands of cars were destroyed in Katrina. I know my car that sat in 8 feet of flooding was towed away by my insurance company while I was living and working in California. Didn't turn in any plate.

i didnt think about that. Guarantee they got a letter.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23274 posts
Posted on 10/20/15 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

However, it is unclear whether that limitation applies at all to debts owed to the government and whether that limitation would be from the time of the "violation" or from the time Louisiana calls it a debt.
this is the reason for the phantom "first letter". Statute doesn't apply if you've already been notified of the violation/penalty 15 years ago.

Thanks for doing that research. Very helpful.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram