- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Any good podcasts/programs on the Defenestration of Prague and the 30 years war
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:10 pm
It’s a fascinating conflict in that early gunpowder period that I haven’t found a lot of media on. Have you?
These brave warriors (dressed like lollipop guild rejects) started the conflict by defenestrating (great word) some catholic nobles out a window, where they survived (ostensibly) by falling on a dung heap.
Unlike this defenestration
And spawned 30 years of fighting involving much of Europe
With famous cavalry charges
Dragoons
Halberdiers
All in that interesting period where gunpowder weapons were just making their real foray into combat, and troops were a mix of ancient melee and new firearms.
I’d love to hear a hardcore history episode on it.
Any good sources? Media? Movies?
Even Lobsters fought in this conflict.
Check out these wild weapons
Imagine pointblank musket combat, followed by poking a guy with a sword til he bleeds Mortal Kombat style, then bashing him in the head with your helmet, whipping him, wrestling him, then stealing his clothes
Anyone else like this conflict?
These brave warriors (dressed like lollipop guild rejects) started the conflict by defenestrating (great word) some catholic nobles out a window, where they survived (ostensibly) by falling on a dung heap.
Unlike this defenestration
And spawned 30 years of fighting involving much of Europe
With famous cavalry charges
Dragoons
Halberdiers
All in that interesting period where gunpowder weapons were just making their real foray into combat, and troops were a mix of ancient melee and new firearms.
I’d love to hear a hardcore history episode on it.
Any good sources? Media? Movies?
Even Lobsters fought in this conflict.
Check out these wild weapons
Imagine pointblank musket combat, followed by poking a guy with a sword til he bleeds Mortal Kombat style, then bashing him in the head with your helmet, whipping him, wrestling him, then stealing his clothes
Anyone else like this conflict?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:12 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Anyone else like this conflict?
Me
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:16 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Imagine pointblank musket combat, followed by poking a guy with a sword til he bleeds Mortal Kombat style, then bashing him in the head with your helmet, whipping him, wrestling him, then stealing his clothes
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:20 pm to fr33manator
Is this like the Annexation of Puerto Rico?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:20 pm to fr33manator
Okay, you've got two of my favorite baws here.
First, you've got the baw with the buzzsaw slung over his shoulder with the broadsword from hell:
And then you have the baw with the cat o' nine tails, running around the battlefield, whipping the shite out of people. It would be like running around Omaha Beach, towel snapping the Germans:
[/img]
First, you've got the baw with the buzzsaw slung over his shoulder with the broadsword from hell:
And then you have the baw with the cat o' nine tails, running around the battlefield, whipping the shite out of people. It would be like running around Omaha Beach, towel snapping the Germans:
[/img]This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:21 pm to ReauxlTide222
And doing it all in pants that look like you have filled your magic Mormon underwear
Green soldier- doing the poopy dance:
“So, um, errr, where do we go, y’know, number 2?”
Veteran Warrior, with pants looking like he stuck an air hose in them. Looks down at the greenhorns pathetically limp pants and grins.
“Just like the astronauts”
Green soldier- doing the poopy dance:
“So, um, errr, where do we go, y’know, number 2?”
Veteran Warrior, with pants looking like he stuck an air hose in them. Looks down at the greenhorns pathetically limp pants and grins.
“Just like the astronauts”
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:12 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Is this like the Annexation of Puerto Rico
The Defenestration of Prague would be an awesome name for a football play
Posted on 4/23/19 at 8:39 pm to BRgetthenet
Posted on 4/23/19 at 8:40 pm to fr33manator
quote:
The Defenestration of Prague would be an awesome name for a football play
Or a good eastern European punk rock band.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:08 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Imagine walking up to a chick in the bar and saying “i’d like to Defenestrate you like a Czechoslovakian noble”?
Posted on 4/24/19 at 6:37 am to fr33manator
I’m not sure about podcasts or documentaries on the Thirty Years War, but here are a few books that cover the time period of early modern warfare, that you are interested in:
LINK
The most prominent historian of the time is Geoffrey Parker. He wrote a book called “The Military Revolution” which is one of the jumping-off points for study of early modern war. It doesn’t cover the Thirty Years War specifically as much as the general military trends around that time.
What I find interesting about the Thirty Years War is that there are relatively few histories on the war itself, compared to other wars. My guess is that the complexity of the war and the idea that it was multiple wars combined into one period makes it difficult to tackle. The most important idea, in my opinion, to remember about the Thirty Years War is that it was a stagnant war that was more about occupation than decisive fighting. The army sizes grew to enormous levels, but the battles usually featured only a fraction of those troops actually fighting. Thus, the majority of the troops occupied towns and exploited them. For mercenary companies and independent military contractors, this was a pretty good deal. But it didn’t last. Eventually, rulers figured out that they needed armies large enough to both occupy and attack, to crack fortified towns. That led to armies so huge and so influential that it bolstered absolute monarchy, the next big trend in European history.
LINK
The most prominent historian of the time is Geoffrey Parker. He wrote a book called “The Military Revolution” which is one of the jumping-off points for study of early modern war. It doesn’t cover the Thirty Years War specifically as much as the general military trends around that time.
What I find interesting about the Thirty Years War is that there are relatively few histories on the war itself, compared to other wars. My guess is that the complexity of the war and the idea that it was multiple wars combined into one period makes it difficult to tackle. The most important idea, in my opinion, to remember about the Thirty Years War is that it was a stagnant war that was more about occupation than decisive fighting. The army sizes grew to enormous levels, but the battles usually featured only a fraction of those troops actually fighting. Thus, the majority of the troops occupied towns and exploited them. For mercenary companies and independent military contractors, this was a pretty good deal. But it didn’t last. Eventually, rulers figured out that they needed armies large enough to both occupy and attack, to crack fortified towns. That led to armies so huge and so influential that it bolstered absolute monarchy, the next big trend in European history.
Posted on 4/24/19 at 11:30 am to SpqrTiger
For the OP:
Wittenburg to Westphalia is about the wars of the Protestant reformation, and likely as close as to what you want, as you are going to find easily. Its designed for casual podlisteners, with no assumed background, so it can be pretty slow for people who don't want a lot of the general introduction to the history.
LINK
Wittenburg to Westphalia is about the wars of the Protestant reformation, and likely as close as to what you want, as you are going to find easily. Its designed for casual podlisteners, with no assumed background, so it can be pretty slow for people who don't want a lot of the general introduction to the history.
LINK
Popular
Back to top

5








