- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:00 pm to Eli Goldfinger
True, and from what I recall from my time in Norway, this only applies to the wilderness areas. I may be thinking of a different deal, but in the norther parts of the Nordic countries, natives can roam between countries freely and stay where they want.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:02 pm to GRTiger
Hmm, nope, I’d be Robin Hooding game, left and right.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:09 pm to Eli Goldfinger
I grew up nearby what was basically huge amounts of open land. It was owned by Crown Z but they had it open. Then assholes started dumping couches, trash and washing machines all over and soon it was fenced and leased to hunting clubs. IOW, we’d find a way to frick that up.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:11 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
For no more than 2 days.
So on day 3 they pack up, move to neighbor's land for 2 days, then come back to mine...
and not shite can be done?
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:15 pm to PrivatePublic
Man...I guess
I think you’re putting too much emphasis on the possibiliry of someone taking advantage, because we have lots of jackasses here. That’s just not how folks behave there.
I think you’re putting too much emphasis on the possibiliry of someone taking advantage, because we have lots of jackasses here. That’s just not how folks behave there.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:17 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Right, but you're asking if it could work here so I kinda have to think about how people behave here to answer that.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:18 pm to PrivatePublic
I’m sure it wouldn’t work here.
It probably could if it had been the norm for generations.
It probably could if it had been the norm for generations.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:20 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
could this work in the US?
Here is your answer
teens rob store as man is dying of a heart attack
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:26 pm to Eli Goldfinger
No.
It's called "private property " for a reason....
It's called "private property " for a reason....
Posted on 9/11/18 at 10:40 pm to Eli Goldfinger
I'd bet 99.5% of homes are on small enough property that this idea is not relevant.
The culture is entirely different as well.
This could work in Japan, for I feel the Japanese would probably make the area nicer than it was before they arrived.
Perhaps the same mentality of national honor is evident in the Nordic countries, as well.
For better or worse, our country is about the "me first" mentality, which makes us think this wouldn't work here. You'd have many "get off my property" types, along with a bunch of frickups that would just as well trash your place as they would eat.
The culture is entirely different as well.
This could work in Japan, for I feel the Japanese would probably make the area nicer than it was before they arrived.
Perhaps the same mentality of national honor is evident in the Nordic countries, as well.
For better or worse, our country is about the "me first" mentality, which makes us think this wouldn't work here. You'd have many "get off my property" types, along with a bunch of frickups that would just as well trash your place as they would eat.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:25 pm to East Coast Band
Most houses are probably on small parcels, but private individuals own larger chunks of land.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:29 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Frick that!
I don’t want “those we don’t speak of” camping on my land
I don’t want “those we don’t speak of” camping on my land
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:03 am to Eli Goldfinger
Prancing and dancing around Chicago's south side seems delightful this time of year.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:13 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
I'm sure that would work great in our "diverse" culture.
Yes.
It's not the white people setting up meth operations, it'll be the black and brown people leaving the cities to play with berries in the boonies.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:39 am to Shiftyplus1
quote:
We have hundreds of thousands of square miles of national parks. No nation on Earth can touch the size, variation, and majesty of our national parks. We don't need that weird commie law, because of our protected natural parks.
National Parks are just one component of public lands.
National forests and BLM land make up a large chunk and dispersed camping is free on these lands.
Here is a website that lets you search free camping sites: https://freecampsites.net/
Here is an explanation of the different types of public lands: https://www.doi.gov/blog/americas-public-lands-explained
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:48 am to GRTiger
quote:
Just to be clear, this means if I own 100 acres of land, any bum can pitch a tent, fish in my pond and live there as long as they aren't within 250 feet of my house?
nobody can fish in your pond or hunt on your property without permission. unless it's wilderness, aka not cultivated, they cannot trespass.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 6:59 am to Eli Goldfinger
If you're advocating for the erosion of private property rights, there's a political party with views that that align closely with yours.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 7:18 am to Eli Goldfinger
We have enough public land in this country to allow for all the roaming one could desire. We have no need to diminish property rights to allow for roaming as some small nations have done.
It doesn't seem like a lack of wilderness or park access is a problem in the US.
It doesn't seem like a lack of wilderness or park access is a problem in the US.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 7:43 am to Kafka
quote:
this would not work in the US
Nor should it
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News