re: Alabama Public Television won't run 'Arthur' gay wedding

I accept your tapout....

I will be gracious if you stop being stupid....

quote:

---

You're doing it again.

---

Again, I accept your tapout....

You are unable to refute my facts....

Don't be ashamed, you are one of many....

Unfortunately a kid is being abused and the Left are celebrating it but hey, diversity or something.....

So you can’t prove I’m not God?

Tapout accepted.

Further, you’re a pedophile. Prove me wrong.

I accept your tapout....

quote:

---

Meh most people obsessed with him are the same morons obsessed with child beauty pageants.

---

The kid appeared on the Ellen Show and was praised by a former President and a woman who came close to being President as well as scores of other influential "mainstream" personalities....

He was "honored" by Converse for his "bravery"....

The sexual victimization of this child is NOT relegated to just a few weirdos, he's a legit cultural phenomenon and that's a fact.

quote:

---

Bringing this kid up is evidence of how far you have to move to goalposts to try to make a gay marriage

---

Nope, this thread deviated a few times from the original post and one of those points was about the attempted mainstreaming of pedophilia by the Left and the LGBT Community....

I don't give two zhits what people do with their plumbing in the privacy of their own homes, but to say there aren't ANY subversive movements within the Gay Community and their allies on the Left to mainstream the sexualization of children is a lie.

quote:

---

Feel free to prove me wrong

---

Not how this works. Just in case you know how to comprehend (doubtful) Ill help you out

The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) is the obligation of a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will prove the claims they have made against the other party. In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets its burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side. Burdens may be of different kinds for each party, in different phases of litigation. The burden of production is a minimal burden to produce at least enough evidence for the trier of fact to consider a disputed claim.[1]:16–17 After litigants have met the burden of production and their claim is being considered by a trier of fact, they have the burden of persuasion, that enough evidence has been presented to persuade the trier of fact that their side is correct. There are different standards of persuasiveness ranging from a preponderance of the evidence, where there is just enough evidence to tip the balance, to proof beyond a reasonable doubt, as in United States criminal courts.[1]:17

The burden of proof is always on the person who brings a claim in a dispute. It is often associated with the Latin maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, a translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."[2]

The party that does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption of being correct, they are presumed to be correct, until the burden shifts after presentation of evidence by the party bringing the action. An example is in an American criminal case, where there is a presumption of innocence by the defendant. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.

Take care kids, it's been fun educating you...

I certainly hope some of you wake up, grow up and realize that sexual abuse of a child isn't something to take lightly and laugh off and that pointing out that certain segments of the Gay Community along with their Political allies are trying to mainstream the obvious abuse of children isn't an indictment on the Gay Community as a whole...

quote:

---

, it's been fun educating you

---

Also the Catholic Church has done way more harm to kids then the LGBT community ever has