Started By
Message

re: Afghan veteran in standoff with police over red flag laws in up state NY

Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:07 am to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21129 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Is it against the law for non-felons to own guns?

Yes... those with domestic violence convictions. shite, even a dishonorable discharge will lose you 2a rights.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122195 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:10 am to
quote:

Because I believe the second amendment keeps a free people free. Why do you love heavy handed governance?



Dude, I am pro guns an all, but you are defending this dude as if he was just a guy sitting at home watching college football and all of a sudden the police showed up because they heard he had some guns in his house. And once they showed up he wen throw on his military gear as if he was planning on going to war with a bunch of police.

If that is really what happened, there would be some serious backlash. But this will be something both sides of the political aisle will use to fit their agenda.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:11 am to
It’s quite literally the opinion of every single cop that someone has violated the law when they arrest them on suspicion. This implies lacking fact and therefore an “I think” on the cops part.

So I’ll ask you again, what in the frick are you talking about?
Posted by Dirt Mover
North Louisiana
Member since Aug 2010
547 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:14 am to
Do you have all of the facts? Reprehensible behavior based on a screenshot of a text message of someone you don’t know at all? It’s called being reasonable and looking at the totality of all of the circumstances. Calling for cops to be “taken out” is stupid. Not saying that you said that, but is that reasonable? Making assumptions based on partial knowledge usually doesn’t pay off. So if you read my earlier posts, I never said anything about arresting anyone or taking anything from anyone.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:15 am to
I think you’re confused about the chain of events
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:15 am to
quote:

but you are defending this dude as if he was just a guy sitting at home watching college football and all of a sudden the police showed up because they heard he had some guns in his house.


Wouldn't doubt they went overboard. I'd trust a citizen before the government.
Posted by Dirt Mover
North Louisiana
Member since Aug 2010
547 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:18 am to
Probable cause, not suspicion. It’s the law and has been backed up by the US Supreme Court for many years. It’s hard for me to agree with someone who prefaces an opinion with “literally”.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40157 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:19 am to
Imagine how you dope smokers would feel if the friend you have that doesn’t smoke turned you in to the police for smoking dope.

That’s what happened here.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122195 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Is that a crime?


No its not a crime, but its not really something people do.. Go around wearing their military gear. If the guy has serious mental issues including PTSD, he could really be in a state of mind where he thinks he is back in a war zone.

If that is the case and he has guns in his home I can understand someone being concerned enough to call the police. But according to you, because of the 2nd amendment people who are threat to do harm to themselves or others should have a right to be a threat to themselves or others.
Posted by The Funnie Five
Bluffington
Member since Feb 2019
3404 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:20 am to
frick red flag laws. They are unconstitutional excuses for a heavy handed police state.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:24 am to
You can dress it up however you’d like, but you don’t have what you’re demanding we present in this thread when you’re arresting people and that’s a FACT.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30521 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Wouldn't doubt they went overboard. I'd trust a citizen before the government.


I tend to agree with you re state vs citizen, but we do have the soldier he served with turning him in apparently. So with no other facts I tend to put a level of credibility in that when both Whiskey and the state have a vested interest in their statements. Now his fellow soldier might have a bone to pick with him or his wife might be picking his bone but I am more dubious about that.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122195 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:27 am to
So lets say this happens.

A husband with mental issues flips out and threats to kill his wife and their kids. He leaves out of the room and goes towards an area where he keeps his guns. The wife takes the kids and leaves.. Call the police and reports what happens. You think they the police are violating his rights if they temporarily take his guns? Yes I know he can use other weapons, but you can do more damage with guns. Someone not thinking rational and has threatened to kill someone should have their guns temporarily taken away from them. That's a safety issue.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:28 am to
You really don't understand.
Posted by The Funnie Five
Bluffington
Member since Feb 2019
3404 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:28 am to
quote:

You think they the police are violating his rights if they temporarily take his guns?


Yes
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95669 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:29 am to
quote:

they used the red flag law and this report as grounds for assaulting his property to find out.


And, I guess the good news is - this is (pardon the pun) ammo to push back in pro 2nd states (i.e. the South and that's about it, boys), because this is exactly how they will be used to function as backdoor gun control.

Period.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:29 am to
quote:

frick red flag laws.


All they will do is keep people from seeking help

The unintended consequence of government overregulation and laws.
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:30 am to
Shut up Rodger

Don’t you have a hibernating bear to go diddle
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:32 am to
So you’re in favor of violating not one, but two constitutional rights for the sake of “safety.”

Good to know.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:33 am to
quote:

Rodger


You can't even spell, junior.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram