- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Afghan veteran in standoff with police over red flag laws in up state NY
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:07 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:07 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Is it against the law for non-felons to own guns?
Yes... those with domestic violence convictions. shite, even a dishonorable discharge will lose you 2a rights.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:10 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Because I believe the second amendment keeps a free people free. Why do you love heavy handed governance?
Dude, I am pro guns an all, but you are defending this dude as if he was just a guy sitting at home watching college football and all of a sudden the police showed up because they heard he had some guns in his house. And once they showed up he wen throw on his military gear as if he was planning on going to war with a bunch of police.
If that is really what happened, there would be some serious backlash. But this will be something both sides of the political aisle will use to fit their agenda.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:11 am to Dirt Mover
It’s quite literally the opinion of every single cop that someone has violated the law when they arrest them on suspicion. This implies lacking fact and therefore an “I think” on the cops part.
So I’ll ask you again, what in the frick are you talking about?
So I’ll ask you again, what in the frick are you talking about?
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:14 am to Carl Tuckerson
Do you have all of the facts? Reprehensible behavior based on a screenshot of a text message of someone you don’t know at all? It’s called being reasonable and looking at the totality of all of the circumstances. Calling for cops to be “taken out” is stupid. Not saying that you said that, but is that reasonable? Making assumptions based on partial knowledge usually doesn’t pay off. So if you read my earlier posts, I never said anything about arresting anyone or taking anything from anyone.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:15 am to OweO
I think you’re confused about the chain of events
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:15 am to OweO
quote:
but you are defending this dude as if he was just a guy sitting at home watching college football and all of a sudden the police showed up because they heard he had some guns in his house.
Wouldn't doubt they went overboard. I'd trust a citizen before the government.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:18 am to TigerOnTheMountain
Probable cause, not suspicion. It’s the law and has been backed up by the US Supreme Court for many years. It’s hard for me to agree with someone who prefaces an opinion with “literally”.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
Imagine how you dope smokers would feel if the friend you have that doesn’t smoke turned you in to the police for smoking dope.
That’s what happened here.
That’s what happened here.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:19 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
Is that a crime?
No its not a crime, but its not really something people do.. Go around wearing their military gear. If the guy has serious mental issues including PTSD, he could really be in a state of mind where he thinks he is back in a war zone.
If that is the case and he has guns in his home I can understand someone being concerned enough to call the police. But according to you, because of the 2nd amendment people who are threat to do harm to themselves or others should have a right to be a threat to themselves or others.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:20 am to OweO
frick red flag laws. They are unconstitutional excuses for a heavy handed police state.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:24 am to Dirt Mover
You can dress it up however you’d like, but you don’t have what you’re demanding we present in this thread when you’re arresting people and that’s a FACT.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Wouldn't doubt they went overboard. I'd trust a citizen before the government.
I tend to agree with you re state vs citizen, but we do have the soldier he served with turning him in apparently. So with no other facts I tend to put a level of credibility in that when both Whiskey and the state have a vested interest in their statements. Now his fellow soldier might have a bone to pick with him or his wife might be picking his bone but I am more dubious about that.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:27 am to The Funnie Five
So lets say this happens.
A husband with mental issues flips out and threats to kill his wife and their kids. He leaves out of the room and goes towards an area where he keeps his guns. The wife takes the kids and leaves.. Call the police and reports what happens. You think they the police are violating his rights if they temporarily take his guns? Yes I know he can use other weapons, but you can do more damage with guns. Someone not thinking rational and has threatened to kill someone should have their guns temporarily taken away from them. That's a safety issue.
A husband with mental issues flips out and threats to kill his wife and their kids. He leaves out of the room and goes towards an area where he keeps his guns. The wife takes the kids and leaves.. Call the police and reports what happens. You think they the police are violating his rights if they temporarily take his guns? Yes I know he can use other weapons, but you can do more damage with guns. Someone not thinking rational and has threatened to kill someone should have their guns temporarily taken away from them. That's a safety issue.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:28 am to OweO
You really don't understand.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:28 am to OweO
quote:
You think they the police are violating his rights if they temporarily take his guns?
Yes
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:29 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
they used the red flag law and this report as grounds for assaulting his property to find out.
And, I guess the good news is - this is (pardon the pun) ammo to push back in pro 2nd states (i.e. the South and that's about it, boys), because this is exactly how they will be used to function as backdoor gun control.
Period.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:29 am to The Funnie Five
quote:
frick red flag laws.
All they will do is keep people from seeking help
The unintended consequence of government overregulation and laws.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
Shut up Rodger
Don’t you have a hibernating bear to go diddle
Don’t you have a hibernating bear to go diddle
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:32 am to OweO
So you’re in favor of violating not one, but two constitutional rights for the sake of “safety.”
Good to know.
Good to know.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 12:33 am to ellishughtiger
quote:
Rodger
You can't even spell, junior.
Popular
Back to top


0





