- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 78 % of non-OT members live paycheck to paycheck
Posted on 5/18/18 at 8:43 am to ItNeverRains
Posted on 5/18/18 at 8:43 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
Having to use parents to qualify.
Probably a sign you don't need to buy the house right now.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 8:46 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
They have almost 50k in credit card debt and want to buy a 600k house.
The frick they want a 600k house for with 50k in revolving?
What's their credit score? 400?!
Posted on 5/18/18 at 8:47 am to Restomod
quote:
Skeeter is a priority baw
Hey, it all fun and games until you throw this out there.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 8:48 am to TH03
quote:
Some people going paycheck to paycheck aren't even able to put money towards retirement.
Sure, a percentage are, but I bet the larger percentage aren't willing to vs able to.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 9:55 am to TH03
Here is why I disagree with that definition (and keep in mind I realize there are different ways to view it:
The majority of the percentage meationed in the OP is fundamentally a spending problem, not an income problem.
Retirement savings, while potentionally accessible, are typically illiquid.
So what is the functional difference from an accounting perspective in tying up cash flow in that and tying up cash flow in frivolous spending? You are still suffering the same effects in your present day financial standing. You can immediately alter your habits for more money. You might even have an asset you can sell at a loss (like retirement funds) if you are in a pinch.
The majority of the percentage meationed in the OP is fundamentally a spending problem, not an income problem.
Retirement savings, while potentionally accessible, are typically illiquid.
So what is the functional difference from an accounting perspective in tying up cash flow in that and tying up cash flow in frivolous spending? You are still suffering the same effects in your present day financial standing. You can immediately alter your habits for more money. You might even have an asset you can sell at a loss (like retirement funds) if you are in a pinch.
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 5/18/18 at 10:12 am to Will Cover
i live trust fund check to trust fund check.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 12:12 pm to DBG
quote:
frick all that. Reality is, a lot of people get sidetracked by a giant medical bill or totaling their vehicle or a dozen other unexpected, large bills.
Sounds like you were just poor and while that’s the case for many people, others get derailed by unexpected shite and it takes a long time to recover.
I dont disagree with you here but thats not most people. Most people are making enough money for a period of time before something unexpected bites them in the arse but in their hubris they failed to save for such an event thinking that the good times will always roll. They then want to cry victim.
In my example above of those 3-4 years we were struggling, we would have been pounded by something major but thats what friends and family are for. We DID in fact have a couple unexpected problems arise during that period but because we were responsible we were able to either make personal loans through our bank or sell off some of our goods or work overtime or insert solution here.
How many people you know always racked up crushing medical debt their entire life that they could never get out from under? I personally, only know of one. She was born with spina bifida but her parents took care of all of her medical bills before she grew up and struck out on her own.
The only time I feel that people deserve help is when they are just starting out in life and they havent inherited any resources. It takes time to build wealth. And by "help" I mean opportunity to earn something. Not a free handout.
If youre 25-30+ and youre still struggling then 9/10 you made poor choices in life and/or refused to budget/sacrifice.
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 5/18/18 at 12:18 pm to Will Cover
Companies are paying people less money, cutting a majority of their full time positions for season and part time workers, and renting any kind of home or apt is absurdly expensive...
It's common sense, prices are going up, wages are stagnant.
It's common sense, prices are going up, wages are stagnant.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 12:52 pm to Will Cover
quote:
Why is it so difficult for people to live within their means and live on less than what they make? Is this really a hard concept for the majority of people to grasp?
The cost of living keeps rising, and wages aren't keeping up. So even if you live a "modest" lifestyle, it is difficult. The cost of housing, daycare, fuel, food, etc. has skyrocketed in the last 20 years. Wages have not.
Popular
Back to top


0








