Started By
Message

re: 63 banks on the brink of insolvency according to the FDIC

Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20593 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:28 pm to
30 year rate was lower a couple of years ago.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2987 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Rates have dropped but remember the Fed indicated at least 3 rate cuts this year. Do you still see that happening?

Personally, no. But it has to happen eventually.

As long as banks don’t start panick-selling bonds and MBS, those unrealized losses will never be realized.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 1:31 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103077 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

As long as banks don’t start panick-selling bonds and MBS, those unrealized losses will never be realized.


They are forced to sell if their depositors jump ship to another bank. Which is exactly why Silicon Valley Bank failed in the last few years, as their assets were showing unrealized losses and couldn’t liquidate enough to pay off the depositors.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133387 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Rates have dropped but remember the Fed indicated at least 3 rate cuts this year.
I don't recall the Fed ever saying there would be "at least" 3 Fed funds rate cuts in 2024.

What I remember is last year the Fed Board forecast 3 rate cuts in 2024 but they added a caveat that any rate decisions would be data dependent.

quote:

Do you still see that happening?
Fed Fund futures are forecasting higher than 50% probability of two rate cuts before 12/31/24. The first cut is now predicted to occur in September and the second reduction after the Presidential election.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2987 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

They are forced to sell if their depositors jump ship to another bank. Which is exactly why Silicon Valley Bank failed in the last few years, as their assets were showing unrealized losses and couldn’t liquidate enough to pay off the depositors.

SVB was a niche bank whose depositors were almost all tech sector venture capitalists. They might as well have had NPC’s from a 2003 video game as retail customers.

A diversified deposit mix is not just going to simultaneously up and flee a typical bank en masse like they did with SVB.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16282 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

SVB was a niche bank whose depositors were almost all tech sector venture capitalists.

It was a lot deeper than that. They were an incredibly business friendly bank. I've never been in tech VC and had accounts with them and almost all of my clients did. The vast majority of those client accounts were for payroll and other normal business functions. They were the go-to bank for VC bros but they had a ton of other business as well that was put at risk.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 1:54 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133387 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

30 year rate was lower a couple of years ago.
Okay but how does Yellen "refinance" those bonds at a lower rate?

That's my question when you wrote, "Yellen messed up when al the long-term debt was not "refinanced"..."
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
13635 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 2:28 pm to
Meh, I remember the 1980's and Resolution Trust set up which forced banks to close if they didn't match the formula mandated. The banks forced to close (including S&L's) had investments such as loaning money to contractors, oil/gas drilling and production, and even retail businesses which had never ever missed a payment as not meeting their criteria of safe loans.

In Lake Chuck, Earl Barger who owned Barger's Drugstore was a casualty. He was forced into bankruptcy as a result of never being a minute late on payments.
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19694 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

primarily due to higher mortgage rates affecting residential mortgage-backed securities


Maybe if we crash the economy 3 or 4 more times with this shite, we'll figure out it's a bad idea
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2987 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

quote:

primarily due to higher mortgage rates affecting residential mortgage-backed securities


Maybe if we crash the economy 3 or 4 more times with this shite, we'll figure out it's a bad idea

If you live in the middle of nowhere, or in a place that is prone to natural disasters (like a lot of posters here), getting a home loan at a rate that isn’t absolutely obscene is going to be difficult if not impossible without a way for local lenders to offload that risk. That’s what MBS does.

It’s simply a tool, like a kitchen blender. It can help you do cool things in your kitchen, but if you’re reckless you can lose some fingers. So the key is to not be reckless.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31630 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

63 isn't an alarming figure when you think of how many rinky dink banks there are just in Louisiana..

I will not feel bad for any banks that fail that were chasing shady real estate financings in order to keep up appearances within their local communities.
Rinky Dinks are on every corner in little podunk towns all over the country.

"People's Bank of ______" exists for a town of 5,000-10,000 residents. "Farmers Bank & Trust", "River Bank & Trust" are all over the place.
Posted by Rising
Member since Apr 2024
454 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:11 pm to
A lot of Spirit Halloween Stores are gonna be popping up here shortly
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Let it fail.

People need hard lessons


I honestly think we need it to go backwards so that we can go forward the right way....... if that makes any sense.
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20593 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:24 pm to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92548 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Fed indicated at least 3 rate cuts this year. Do you still see that happening?


Maybe. If this Fridays BLS is as dogshite as the last one or whay Jolts is indicating and the Unemployment rate goes up to 4% then i think a .5 in Sept could be on the table right in time for the election
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
12446 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Maybe. If this Fridays BLS is as dogshite as the last one or whay Jolts is indicating and the Unemployment rate goes up to 4% then i think a .5 in Sept could be on the table right in time for the election


Don’t know if it’s true, but I am seeing indications that the job numbers over the past year or so have been massively overstated via the birth-death adjustment. If that turns out to be the case then. It could have them scrambling to cut. Guess we’ll have to see.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 5:34 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293053 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:34 pm to
quote:



I honestly think we need it to go backwards so that we can go forward the right way.....


I agree. I'm fine with taking a step or three back.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133387 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:29 pm to
There is nothing in the article you linked which mentions Yellen "refinancing" the U.S. debt. It only talks about how she could have issued longer term new debt.

If you don't know how she could have "refinanced" debt just say so. Thanks.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram