Started By
Message

re: 2019 GMC Sierra

Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by Dmaxxx37
Member since Apr 2017
125 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:20 pm to
New technology in regards to a pickup. Vette's have also had the heads up display forever. They seem to act like this is something new and innovative, when it's not. Same shite = different year
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72844 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:35 pm to
Can't wait to see the price tag on that
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179925 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:37 pm to
is the turning radius still garbage?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179925 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Ford POS




i have never seen a worse fake home made movie in my life.
Posted by Open Dore Policy
The Commodore State
Member since Oct 2012
5451 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:44 pm to
That looks like a waste of money.
Posted by bigrob385series
B. Aura
Member since May 2014
2636 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

GMC one-ups the aluminum cargo box that Ford
knew this was coming...after all the trash talk about aluminum bed's,the answer is highly expensive carbon fiber? they have been trying to "one up" ford for years and have failed time and again.
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:47 pm to
One of these manufactuerers is going to wake up one day and realize most people don't want frilly trucks and go back to the basics. They could build a robust and simple 4x4 3/4 ton truck - with a diesel engine - for under 35k. When this finally happens, they'll destroy the rest of the market.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106105 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:49 pm to
I need my heated leather seats, baw.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179925 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

One of these manufactuerers is going to wake up one day and realize most people don't want frilly trucks and go back to the basics. They could build a robust and simple 4x4 3/4 ton truck - with a diesel engine - for under 35k. When this finally happens, they'll destroy the rest of the market.



ahh... but actual statistics suggest they do. the majority eats up the frilly trucks. you're more than welcome to buy any econoline version of any diesel truck of your choice.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17356 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

have never seen a worse fake home made movie in my life


It was an auto review team called TFL Truck. Their 2017 F250 imploded while conducting a towing test.

I only posted it because I knew it would trigger a few snowflakes.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 3:58 pm
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Can't wait to see the price tag on that


I suspect that will only be on the most expensive models.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89397 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

One of these manufactuerers is going to wake up one day and realize most people don't want frilly trucks and go back to the basics. They could build a robust and simple 4x4 3/4 ton truck - with a diesel engine - for under 35k. When this finally happens, they'll destroy the rest of the market.




You're in the minority.
Posted by Dmaxxx37
Member since Apr 2017
125 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:25 pm to
The video is also total bullshite considering their claiming the 17' 250 to be a diesel when clearly it's a gas burner. You put "20,000 lbs" as they claim behind any of the big 3 single cab base model gas burners and tow that amount of weight up a mountain and obviously it's bound for failure. Typical "snowflake" propaganda promoting false narratives. Nice try-
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Simon Gruber
Member since Mar 2017
941 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:33 pm to
Did they fix the cheap interior parts and instrument cluster that fails after a few years?
Posted by stillplayswithcars
Member since Jan 2018
183 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:39 pm to
GMC's Denali line is the most profitable, on a per unit basis, individual vehicle line in the world.

GM is about to make the brand even more separate from Chevrolet by adding more upscale features that won't be available on Chevrolet.

Customers want upscale, they don't want base trim trucks.

Bloomberg
Posted by j bro12
LA
Member since Jan 2012
1550 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 5:47 pm to
Ford and GM are both garbage. Get a Toyota, they don’t break down.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

With the lighter weight, optional carbon fiber bed, GMC one-ups the aluminum cargo box that Ford has offered in its F-150 since 2015. While the lightweight CarbonPro bed may lag the truck's launch by a few months

Never understood the reason why they want to take weight from the one part of the truck where it's really needed.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


Ford and GM are both garbage. Get a Toyota, they don’t break down.

It's amazing how horrible MPG is for Toyota trucks
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Never understood the reason why they want to take weight from the one part of the truck where it's really needed.



They are putting aluminum engine blocks these days in most trucks.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:31 pm to
I'm saying the beds need to have weight on them to drive better
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram