re: % blame assigned to the terrorist vs his/her weapon(s) of choice?

After a terrorist attacks, citizen's rights to privacy and gun ownership always come under attack.

I assign blame to the terrorist that carried this out and the channels he used to become radicalized.

quote:

---

I hate this argument. We shouldn't want to make it easy for someone to carry out these attacks.

---

Fair enough. You want to make it harder for them to carry out such attacks? Here's how you do it.

1. Secure our borders. Stop the unfettered flood of people coming into this country who have no interest in assimilating into American society and instead want to impose their own backwards ideology on the rest of us.

2. End the PC bullshite that allows people like the Orlando shooter and others like him go about their plans because people are afraid to say something out of fear they'll be branded a racist and/or islamaphobe.

3. Identify those already here among us who are radicalized and wanting to impose their Islamic extremist ideology on the rest of us and deport their arse. This guy in Orlando posted on Facebook before his attacks about how America was bombing "his country". But this fricker was born in New York. This says that despite being born here, he never considered himself an American. Fine, take those who think like him and ship their happy asses back to the Sand Box so they can live in "their country".

But what we don't need to do is surrender our constitutional rights because of some backwards thinking goat fricker wants to turn our country into a greener version of whatever Shitholeistan he or his family came from. We don't need them here. And they don't have a right to even come here. Becoming an American is a privilege and not a right. For some odd reason this country has forgot this fact. It's time we start remembering it.

According to facebook the gun is 100% at fault.

Apparently it has tentacles and matches on to followers of radical Islam or other easily influenced individuals and takes over their minds and forces their fingers to pull the trigger.

Meet Mikey, 8: U.S. Has Him on Watch List


This kid (and his father) would be barred from ever owning a weapon.


The list sounds good in theory until someone puts you on it for any random reason and you lose your liberties for no reason

Carefully planned and executed attack. Carnage would have been the same or similar no matter what instrumentality used. "AR" not feasible, then combination of guns, if not guns, then bombs, chemical or who knows maybe automobile.

Only a damned fool would think that this would have been averted or limited by the availability of a certain thing.

Islamonutjob 100%

quote:

---

Unless you are living under a rock you know that some in government are saying that if guns weren't so readily available the Orlando night club incident wouldn't have happened.

My question to the OT is simply how do you personally assign blame?

---

Guns are harmless unless you have the drive to use them to kill. Stricter gun laws hasn't helped France nor San Bernadino.

No one says "Oh, look! A gun! I've never thought about killing someone until now and I have a few minutes sooo..." Focus on the motivation, not the tool.

100%
0%

quote:

---

My question to the OT is simply how do you personally assign blame?

---

I start with blaming the savage who committed this atrocity along with ideology and all the complicit practitioners and their supporters.