re: Why wouldn't the saints get Michael Vick?

quote:

---

he has more rushing yards than Bush, Thomas and Mike Bell combined

We had 1 100yd runner last year in a game

---

riiiight. because running from the pass blocking pocket after 3-5 seconds is the same as lining up as a h-back, taking the ball, seeing the hole and hitting it hard like a running back. yes, I can see how you come to the conclusion that Vick would be a RB

quote:

---

Payton is known for his "creativeness"....

---

and running the "wildcat" is creative, because Payton created it. yes, I see how you draw this conclusion as well.

quote:

---

wildcat would be unstoppable with him back there.

---

and you want to run Miami's... ughem, sorry.... Payton's creative "Wildcat" why? Maybe we can dub it the "copycat" for the Saints when we run it, for that would be more fitting for this "creative" offense. yeah.

frick this "wildcat" bullshite. While it did work for Miami last year for the most part, teams started cueing in on it down the stretch and rendered it basically inneffective. There were some spurts of success, but mostly it was ineffective.

So let's get off of saying the Saints would be creative by copying a gimmick play that another team developed and used last year. That's what we call contradictory, holmes.



and finally, why the frick is there yet another Vick thread here? Dammit, people, can none of you read that are starting these things, or do you just like to torment us with more opportunities for Leddah Oil (Learch) and Tabasco to ramble their rediculous nonsense.

Thanks alot, OP

ok, let's see here. I said,

quote:

---

frick this "wildcat" bullshite. While it did work for Miami last year for the most part, teams started cueing in on it down the stretch and rendered it basically inneffective. There were some spurts of success, but mostly it was ineffective.

---

and your retort was,

quote:

---

lol...Saintard. Doesnt get much better than this.

---

hmmmmm, point counterpoint. well, I don't see how I won that one. good one, Learch



now to my personal favorite of your post....

quote:

---

So its not creative because someone used it before? lol. You continue to challenge whodatfan for King Saintard.

---

Isn't that the definition of creative? How about I give you Webster's definition, since word meanings seem to allude you.

creative: having the quality of something created rather than imitated : imaginative

quote:

---

When you can construct a well thought out post, please, come back and try and debate with me

---

were you speaking to a mirror when you wrote this? You may want to reread your posts before hitting submit, because you really make yourself look quite ignorant.

quote:

---

stick to designing cheesy sig picks and avatars.

---

thanks, at least you got something right. although, the sig pic is created by "whodatfan", so I can't take credit for that. Thanks, whodat. I didn't expect it, but it was a nice surprise.

we had the best offense in the league without him haha

that being said i wouldnt dislike getting him but hes not a must have

quote:

---

frick this "wildcat" bullshite. While it did work for Miami last year for the most part, teams started cueing in on it down the stretch and rendered it basically inneffective. There were some spurts of success, but mostly it was ineffective.

---

Um, doesn't every NFL defensive coordinator have the chance to "cue in" on any offense of any team in the NFL? Or is every team's offensive gameplan a secret?


seriously?

Anyone who thinks that adding another dynamic piece to our offensive is stupid, is in fact stupid. Who's to say we will have the top ranked offense again?

and whoever said the part about him being mainly a runner and we couldn't use that :rotflmao: :rotflmao: check our rushing numbers the last 4 years or so

quote:

---

This seems like a no-brainer to me.

---

It really is.

quote:

---

Look I can't stand thugs

---

Mike Vick is not a thug.

His brother, on the other hand. . .

quote:

---

Anyone who thinks that adding another dynamic piece to our offensive is stupid, is in fact stupid.

---

Taroof

quote:

---

I tell yall what, I would be more comfortable having Vick as a backup compared to old arse Brunell and sorry arse Joey Harrington.

---

+ 1

So should we not have any players who have had issues with the law ever?

Why isn't there as much uproar about Donte Stallworth?? ... he got drunk and KILLED someone.

lester my man, your arguement is as weak as it is painful to read.

none of our RBs started a full 16 games the last 2 years. bush was injured most of the season, pierre only started 5 games, deuce, well, you know how that went. Reggie was burning it up the first 1/3 of the season till he got injured. He would have had 1000 yards rushing and more receiving had he not gotten hurt. If pierre started all 16 games he would have had WELL over a 1000 yards.

Let me tell you this (which has been stated more than once in this thread). Vick had all those rushing yards running from the QB position with the defense dropping back, not playing the run. Like it has been stated, you cannot compare that type of running to purely lining up in the backfield on a pure arse running play and taking a handoff, pitch, toss, sweep, whatever you want to call it. It IS not the same. Bottom line. You know it, I know it, anyone with sense and common football knowledge knows it.

dude, you have been on here for the past week with the sole intent to squabble with the regulars on this board. what, are you jealous like a little school girl or something? your panties on too tight? you got your little click fanboys dropping in randomly to stir up shite too. none of them frickers ever come on here more than once a month at best, now it's every day with some horse shite flamed up threads about the same damn subject. what, do ya'll get in a football huddle and say, "ya'll ready to go on the saints board and stir up some shite with whodat and his "saintard posse"?" "Break!"


nice play call hommie......

and DATS what's up in this mutha fuuuucccckkkkaaaa!








FA SHO!