- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We just traded a top tier player for less than compensatory value if lost in FA
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:12 am to Weekend Warrior79
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:12 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Isn't it expected the Saints will lose their 2023 3rd compensatory credit for Armstead going to the Dolphins because they signed Dalton?
Yes. Our front office doesn't just mismanage the cap.
1
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes. Our front office doesn't just mismanage the cap.
Who should our backup QB be then? We know you don't think it's Hill, so you were good with going with Book as the #2?
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:30 am to Proximo
quote:
We know you don't think it's Hill, so you were good with going with Book as the #2?
Are those the only 2 options?
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
he signed a 1 year $3 million dollar contract to be our backup and gives us a shot to win if Jameis goes down 
you're just an emotional crybaby who wants to bash the front office without being held accountable to your shitty takes
Who would you have signed who could actually keep us in contention and wouldn't affect the compensatory formula?
you're just an emotional crybaby who wants to bash the front office without being held accountable to your shitty takes
Who would you have signed who could actually keep us in contention and wouldn't affect the compensatory formula?
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:37 am to Proximo
quote:
Who would you have signed who could actually keep us in contention
If Jameis goes down, we won't be in contention, so I don't really care. Should have just re-signed Siemian.
We're scraping by being in contention by projecting Jameis to do well this year (and the NFC being dogshit terrible).
The primary reason fans and our front office is so focused on being non-shitty this year is because we already gutted our 2023 draft. Dalton's effects on our comp picks is basically extra cost for the Olave deals.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:45 am to Chad504boy
That’s cute and everything….
But both Nick Underhill and Jeff Duncan said that he’s been refusing to listen to coaches, mouthing off at practice….and sounds like he’s being a contrarian arse
I think you can relate to that last part….it’s kind of your schtick
But both Nick Underhill and Jeff Duncan said that he’s been refusing to listen to coaches, mouthing off at practice….and sounds like he’s being a contrarian arse
I think you can relate to that last part….it’s kind of your schtick
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If Jameis goes down, we won't be in contention, so I don't really care. Should have just re-signed Siemian.
We were in contention last year with Book, Taysom, and Siemian
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:48 am to SlowFlowPro
This team has made it clear at least since 2017 that they are not going to mismanage the roster and not have a viable backup at QB.
They are in contention every single season and that's how they run this football team. They make it clear win-now is their philosophy by trading up every other year as well
They are in contention every single season and that's how they run this football team. They make it clear win-now is their philosophy by trading up every other year as well
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:53 am to Proximo
quote:
This team has made it clear at least since 2017 that they are not going to mismanage the roster and not have a viable backup at QB.
2021?
If Trevor was viable in 2021 he's viable in 2022.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:54 am to LSUZombie
quote:
We were in contention
For a super bowl? No
Posted on 8/31/22 at 11:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
For a super bowl? No
For the playoffs, absolutely?
And while no, I didn't see anyway we would have made the Super Bowl, I would have liked to had the chance to try.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 11:28 am to SlowFlowPro
You act like Taysom got the $140 million from that contract… he’s getting $40m because he isn’t listed as a QB… learn to read
Posted on 8/31/22 at 11:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Should have just re-signed Siemian.
Only good if you just want to lose by a little Slow.
Page 4 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News