- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vilma meeting with Goodell 6/18 @ 10AM
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:37 pm to Sophandros
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:37 pm to Sophandros
quote:Logically, yes.
In this case, THE LEAGUE HAS TO PROVE THAT THE SAINTS HAVE HURT THE LEAGUE'S IMAGE OR COMMITTED THE INFRACTIONS AS STATED
Technically and in reality, no.
1
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:43 pm to Sophandros
For the first time in my life, I would like to see the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson on the scene.
This post was edited on 6/18/12 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:47 pm to shel311
quote:
Logically, yes.
Technically and in reality, no.
That part was simply pointing out the distinction between our case and the Big Ben case.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:53 pm to The Mick
quote:
For the first time in my life, I would like to see the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson on the scene.
Fujita being in the mix screws up any chance of this happening.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 12:55 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
Fujita being in the mix screws up any chance of this happening.
But he went to Berkeley. Doesn't that count for something?
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:03 pm to The Mick
quote:
For the first time in my life, I would like to see the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson on the scene.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:17 pm to doorknob
Jarrett Bell Twitter
And this one earlier...
Not really following him there.
quote:
Reviewed evidence #NFL turned over in bounty case. A mixed bag. Obvious that NFL seeing pay-for-performance and pay-to-injure as the same.
quote:
Maybe most compelling evidence is transcript of notes that not only alleges Vilma and Ornstein pledged $10k to KO Favre, but 'Vitt - $5k'.
And this one earlier...
quote:
What's the beef? CBA sez evidence must be turned over 3 calendar days before hearing. Vilma's attorney interprets that as 72 hours
Not really following him there.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:33 pm to sicboy
Transcript of notes from where? "from the personal desk of Roger Goodell"
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:37 pm to sicboy
quote:
Maybe most compelling evidence is transcript of notes that not only alleges Vilma and Ornstein pledged $10k to KO Favre, but 'Vitt - $5k'.
I think at that point in Favre's on-again/off-again career, a lot of people would have paid money to take him out.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:37 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
No idea. Maybe he read it in the USA Today, in the editorial section.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:48 pm to sicboy
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:49 pm to sicboy
I tried looking at that stuff earlier, but it seems like they made it as hard as possible to read. 
Posted on 6/18/12 at 1:58 pm to sicboy
The language in that seems to be arguing against bounties?
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:00 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
So because Williams used a picture of Dog the Bounty Hunter and spoke of collecting "Bounty$$$", everyone is guilty?
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:02 pm to jembeurt
Duncan is going off, saying the evidence is pretty damning. Does he have something we don't?
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:03 pm to sicboy
Someone summarize that for me.
I aint trying to read legalese.
I aint trying to read legalese.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:03 pm to sicboy
I've unfollowed him on twitter.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:05 pm to Hoodoo Man
quote:
aint trying to read legalese.
Nothing legalese about that document.
You're not even trying.
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:07 pm to sicboy
I did say I wasn't trying, didn't I?
Posted on 6/18/12 at 2:09 pm to Hoodoo Man
Well don't say you can't do something until you know what it is
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News