Started By
Message

re: Time to Trade Brees

Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:53 am to
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
20733 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:53 am to
Two questions:

1) Who would want what appears to be an injured 36 year old quarterback?

2) What would we get for him? A #1? I seriously doubt it.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22539 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Wrong. This would require Brees to agree to an extension or restructure. Mr. NFLPA isn't about to take a pay cut when he could just get a new deal after this one expires.


Lol @ you. An incentive based restructure can be agreed upon as to where Brees still earns his money but is still cap friendly to any suitor. Brees isn't going anywhere but you are talking out of your arse here. Brees has already openly discussed being willing to sign an extention or restructure with the Saints but he says the FO office hasn't approached him or Condon to do so yet.

quote:

The 35-year-old quarterback's contract takes up $18.4 million in cap space next season before ballooning to $26.4 million and $27.4 million in 2014 and 2015. His team enters the offseason at least $12 million over the projected salary cap, according to the The Times-Picayune.

The quarterback said Monday he is open to restructuring his contract.

"Whatever I can do to help this team, if they want to come to me and extend me even further, that'd be great," Brees said.



quote:

"Listen, I get compensated very well. I don't take that for granted for one second," Brees said. "But I play this game because I love this game, I love this locker room and I love the opportunity to win a championship."


LINK
Posted by St Jean The Baptiste
Laredo, TX
Member since Aug 2015
5828 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

bearhc


quote:

Time to Trade Brees


frick you.

Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4600 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Lol @ you. An incentive based restructure can be agreed upon as to where Brees still earns his money but is still cap friendly to any suitor. Brees isn't going anywhere but you are talking out of your arse here. Brees has already openly discussed being willing to sign an extention or restructure with the Saints but he says the FO office hasn't approached him or Condon to do so yet. 


And you post a link to a story from a year and a half ago when he DIDN'T restructure and left the Saints pinned against the cap?! There's no way you're actually this fricking stupid.

Who cares what he said? He's a politician as much as a QB. He had no intent of restructuring, if he did the Saints would've jumped at it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

And you post a link to a story from a year and a half ago when he DIDN'T restructure and left the Saints pinned against the cap?! There's no way you're actually this fricking stupid
Fwiw, you may want to do some research.

The Saints never asked him to restructure. It was also well discussed a lot, but it wouldn't benefit the Saints as much for him to restructure last season as it would in the future.

quote:

He's a politician as much as a QB. He had no intent of restructuring, if he did the Saints would've jumped at it.
No
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 2:11 pm
Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4600 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Fwiw, you may want to do some research.
I'd advise you to do the same. I'd also advise you to look up what the term "public relations" means.

If the Saints didn't ask for a restructure, it's because they knew they wouldn't get it. Condon clients don't take cuts or restructure often.
quote:

No
Um. Yes?

See? I can debate like a 6 year old as well.



Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

What? So you're saying Luck is better than Rodgers? Brady? Brees? Big Ben? Manning? I think not.


You are so short-sighted. No one is saying that. No one would trade Watt for a player on the wrong side of 30. Luck is under 30.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22539 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

I'd advise you to do the same. I'd also advise you to look up what the term "public relations" means.

If the Saints didn't ask for a restructure, it's because they knew they wouldn't get it. Condon clients don't take cuts or restructure often.




quote:

The Broncos submitted the contract with revised language to the NFL on Thursday.

Manning's salary and salary cap numbers do not change.

When Manning was on the roster at the start of the 2013 league year in March, his $20 million salaries in the upcoming season and 2014 became guaranteed, though 2014 could be voided should Manning injure his neck in 2013.

With the revised contract language, the Broncos have insurance protection in case of any major injury that would prevent Manning from playing.

"It has no effect on the financial aspects of Peyton's contract, and it was expected once the guarantee came into play," said Manning's agent Tom Condon. "They'd certainly want to protect themselves in case of injury."



LINK

quote:

While that all is probably true, a recent restructuring of Bradford's contract along with the original terms would make it easier for the team to move on from Bradford if he doesn't perform at a high level for the next two seasons.

Remember the constant mentions of the $50 million guaranteed in Bradford's six-year, $78 million contract? Well, the restructuring has removed $6 million of those absolute guarantees, including a total of $6.41 million from the final two years of his deal. However, that money accelerated into his 2013 salary when the team exercised an option bonus in 2011.


quote:

They would, however, still be on the hook for $8 million in salary in 2013, which is guaranteed for skill and injury. His total salary next year is $9 million. It does make you wonder why the skill guarantee was removed this year. It could simply be a concession by agent Tom Condon to receive the money in advance when he knows Bradford won't be released.


LINK

quote:

Who cares what he said? He's a politician as much as a QB. He had no intent of restructuring, if he did the Saints would've jumped at it.


Oh you mean like they rushed out to resign him after the 2011 season when he was set to become a free agent?

Herp a frickin derp
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 8:07 pm
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
6704 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Bradford's six-year, $78 million contract?

And people are complaining about Drew's contract?
Posted by tigermike200444
baton rouge
Member since Dec 2003
9106 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:15 pm to
It was time to trade Brees when he wanted all that money!Could have loaded up then!Now you won't get nothing for him
Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4600 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Herp a frickin derp
Oh wow. 2 examples. One of which was coming off a massive injury. Totally applicable.

You know, you're supposed to ask your parents permission before getting online.
quote:

Oh you mean like they rushed out to resign him after the 2011 season when he was set to become a free agent?
Wtf are you talking about? When the negotiations came around to make him the highest paid player in the league? This isn't even close to the same situation. And fyi, the Saints pushed Brees to get to the table early, he played the long con (which worked for him), and it forced the Saints to burn the franchise tag on him and cost them Carl Nicks. You really think they didn't push to resign him before that?

No way you're this stupid. Really. Good troll baw.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

And fyi, the Saints pushed Brees to get to the table early, he played the long con (which worked for him


Why would Brees want to play the long con? Players tend to want that long term security, especially when that 2006 contract wasn't lucrative

The saints admitted to wanting to wait after the super bowl and into the 2010 season, and they ended up losing their leverage with his 2011 season

quote:

 wow. 2 examples. One of which was coming off a massive injury.  Totally applicable. 



It just went directly against what you said. And 2 nfl starting QBs is a pretty substantial sample. He has 8-9 starting QBs according to wiki

quote:

If the Saints didn't ask for a restructure, it's because they knew they wouldn't get it. Condon clients don't take cuts or restructure often.



Actually, just looked it up. Eli Manning restructured in 2012. Stafford restructured in 2012. Alex Smith in 2009. Tony Romo this year. So that is at least 6 of his 8 starting QBs that have restructured in their careers. The other QB is Matt Ryan who just singed his extension and hasn't really had the opportunity to restructure yet (I left out Fitzmagic as he's a starting QB by injury).

quote:

No way you're this stupid. Really. Good troll baw.



Great theory. You were right on
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 11:01 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
22539 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 12:52 am to
quote:

Actually, just looked it up. Eli Manning restructured in 2012. Stafford restructured in 2012. Alex Smith in 2009. Tony Romo this year. So that is at least 6 of his 8 starting QBs that have restructured in their careers.


Head shot

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 7:38 am to
quote:

If the Saints didn't ask for a restructure, it's because they knew they wouldn't get it
Or is it because they knew it would be more beneficial to restructure 1 season later? I'm guessing you didn't consider that angle? Hence, the research thing I mentioned...

quote:

Condon clients don't take cuts or restructure often
Well, I think the poster above summed that one up for me.

This thread isn't going well for you.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89507 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 7:56 am to
quote:

If we could somehow get Watt out of Houston that would be crazy
Am I still on Earth? Is this a dream land? How many fingers is Jason Pierre Paul holding up?
Posted by DHS1997
BATON ROUGE
Member since Nov 2014
867 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 9:25 am to
36 year old QB with a huge price tag and declining arm strength what is he worth?
Posted by putt1058
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
843 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 10:18 am to
So what do you think we'll get for a 36 y/o QB with a reconstructed throwing shoulder and a bruised rotator cuff????
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29560 posts
Posted on 9/22/15 at 10:24 am to
quote:

36 year old QB with a huge price tag and declining arm strength what is he worth?


I guarantee a team like the Texans would throw some choice draft picks our way for Brees for a year or two. Won't be a 1st, but could see a 2nd and 3rd, and a conditional 2nd.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram