- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tanner McKee - Stanford. Thoughts?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:52 pm
Is this guy worth a 29th pick? He seems to be pretty accurate but his win/loss record doesn't look too good. Anybody watch this guy and have some insight that highlights won't show?
8
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:54 pm to chambers538
Bump
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:11 pm to chambers538
Him or Hooker
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:32 pm to chambers538
Need an OC first
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:45 pm to chambers538
Stanford fell off a few years ago. No idea how good this kid could be. He seems to be a 2nd rounder to me, but wtf do I know
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:53 pm to Spelt it rong
Only started two years and regressed in every category but yards. 13 TDs and 8 INTs on 62% passing, no thanks
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 7:44 am
Posted on 2/1/23 at 7:54 am to chambers538
I’d take a shot at getting him with our early second round pick and pick BPA with the first round pick regardless of position. At this point this team just needs to add talent.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 8:03 am to Damone
Doesn’t Stanford run an extremely antiquated offensive system though?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 6:49 am to chambers538
He played on teams that lacked talent. I would take him in Rd. 2 if he is there. Take the Notre Dame TE at the end of the first round.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 6:55 am to Keeble9145
First rounders get an extra contract year...if he takes time to develop, we'd be glad to have it. Is he worth a first in a vacuum? Probably not, but...
Posted on 2/2/23 at 7:00 am to bearhc
quote:
Take the Notre Dame TE at the end of the first round.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 8:03 am to chambers538
quote:This how bad teams stay bad teams. QB is a position of need, but this is a reach pick. It's a reach pick in any round really. We need great players all over the field, so we take BPA in my opinion in the first two rounds. I did a PFF draft and got Ojulari at Edge and then Kancey at DT from Pittsburgh with the first two picks.
Is this guy worth a 29th pick? He seems to be pretty accurate but his win/loss record doesn't look too good. Anybody watch this guy and have some insight that highlights won't show?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 8:29 am to chambers538
Any QB we draft would have to start immediately and be an obvious long term answer… otherwise they’re just getting replaced by our next coach and our top five draft pick next season
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:00 am to jrobic4
quote:
First rounders get an extra contract year...if he takes time to develop, we'd be glad to have it. Is he worth a first in a vacuum? Probably not, but...
Yeah if you like a qb you absolutely take him at the end of the first instead of with the second rounder.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News