- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SFP's RB argument
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:56 pm to whodatfan
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:56 pm to whodatfan
quote:
Your a fricking dillweed just like SFP. why did the entire professional football world have Ingram rated as a first round pick and not the other backs if they are all one in the same. Eat a dick and get over yourself.
Guess you missed that post where I said I wanted Ingram at #24.
0
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:57 pm to jacks40
quote:
you mean including the 1st we have to give up next year too?
I hate when people say this. Ingram was a 1st round pick that cancels out the 1st round pick for next year. We gave up a 2nd rounder. The question is,is Ingram enough of an impact player to have given up a 2nd rounder and I say yes he is.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:06 pm to dj30
quote:
I hate when people say this. Ingram was a 1st round pick that cancels out the 1st round pick for next year. We gave up a 2nd rounder. The question is,is Ingram enough of an impact player to have given up a 2nd rounder and I say yes he is.
Exactly. I guess no one remembers we sucked last year when guess what? We couldn't run the fricking ball. Giving up a 2nd rounder is worth it IMO.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:08 pm to dj30
SFP may end up being right but he may be wrong. However, comparing college stats proves nothing.
Troy Davis 4,000+ yds rushing vs. Rest of '97 RB Class
He should have been a 1st rder based on this logic.
Troy Davis 4,000+ yds rushing vs. Rest of '97 RB Class
He should have been a 1st rder based on this logic.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:08 pm to jacks40
quote:
you mean including the 1st we have to give up next year too?
the cost wasa 2nd. A 1st this year for a 1st next year is a net gain...not a cost.
Having said that, yes...all things considered including the cost to acquire the pick.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:08 pm to Penn
quote:
What league did leshoure play in again?
The same one the LBer the Saints just picked played in.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:12 pm to JJ27
Funny that you think the saints fricked up taking Ingram yet the professionals are saying the patriots probably fricked up by passing on Ingram. But alas, you're probably right.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:14 pm to JJ27
quote:
What league did leshoure play in again?
The same one the LBer the Saints just picked played in
The level of competition argument is more relevant for some positions than others, IMO
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:15 pm to JJ27
you cant use just numbers.
the saints liked ingram. it could be other stuff like they feel ingram has a team first mentality and will fit into rbbc better. other stuff that doesnt show up in stats like blocking and making mistakes also fit in. you cant just throw out some numbers and say 1 player is equal to another.
the saints liked ingram better so they did what they had to do to get him. if they are wrong they are wrong.... but they have a good track record on draft picks so far.
the saints liked ingram. it could be other stuff like they feel ingram has a team first mentality and will fit into rbbc better. other stuff that doesnt show up in stats like blocking and making mistakes also fit in. you cant just throw out some numbers and say 1 player is equal to another.
the saints liked ingram better so they did what they had to do to get him. if they are wrong they are wrong.... but they have a good track record on draft picks so far.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:17 pm to F machine
quote:
Ingram could turn out to be emmitt smith
I don't think so. Dallas was a run first offense designed around Smith. There is no way Payton does that.
quote:
it's dumb to say we could have gotten someone just as good in the 2nd? How do you really know that
not nearly as dumb as people assuming Ingram will be E Smith. Recent NFL history shows us that there is a glut of RB talent, there is no need to give up a high draft pick to get one.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:17 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Funny that you think the saints fricked up taking Ingram yet the professionals are saying the patriots probably fricked up by passing on Ingram. But alas, you're probably right.
Funny that your reading comprehension sucks. For the THIRD time in this thread alone...I wanted Ingram with the 24th pick. I love Ingram as a Saint. I was saying what SFP said last night rang true. That's all...
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:19 pm to H-Town Tiger
Ingram fits a massive need for the saints. He is not going to get Emmitt Smith numbers in the Saints offense.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:19 pm to rds dc
quote:
The level of competition argument is more relevant for some positions than others, IMO
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:20 pm to Penn
quote:
What league did leshoure play in again?
what does that have to do with anything? Jesus you SECtards are ridiculous and make us all look like goobers. Do you know what league Ladanian Tomlinson played in? How did playing in the SEC translate into the NFL for McFadden, JR?
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:20 pm to JJ27
we gave up a lot but im happy with ingram.
do you remember who was running the ball against seattle last year when the game was on the line?
do you remember who was running the ball against seattle last year when the game was on the line?
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
Same could be said for a lot of running backs...Marshall Faulk
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:21 pm to Deactived
Deshaun fricking Wynn...
We swapped ones with NE and gave them a 2nd. I'll take that any day of the week.
We swapped ones with NE and gave them a 2nd. I'll take that any day of the week.
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:22 pm to Deactived
quote:
do you remember who was running the ball against seattle last year when the game was on the line?
can you assure me that Ingram will never get hurt? Because that's why there were scrubs running against Seattle.
This post was edited on 4/29/11 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:22 pm to bubbz
quote:
Deshaun fricking Wynn.
lol exactly
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:35 pm to JJ27
quote:
Funny that your reading comprehension sucks. For the THIRD time in this thread alone...I wanted Ingram with the 24th pick.
Well SFP didnt want Ingram in the first round so you cant disagree with SFP and at the same time agree with SFP.
quote:
I love Ingram as a Saint.
Me too.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News