Started By
Message

re: Payton's Inexcusable Timeout Management

Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:16 pm to
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60265 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

He supplements bad logic with good grammar.

So you're saying there is actually some small redeeming quality to his posts? Good grammar?
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117700 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

It's always been something to see.


I would have thought it was a joke, but he posted it on the MSB right before this.

OP's getting lazy with his trolls I guess.



Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:16 pm to
Jesus, I always knew 1/4 people are what I call "gen pop", but your stupidity is exceptional...

lesson: when you win the game, almost everything is excusable.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10456 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

If you paid attention to the announcers yesterday, I know that is a chore, that stated that by calling that TO it gave the refs more time to look at the play. If he didn't call the TO then they would have had to make a decision within 60 seconds.



That's not what they said at all. It was a wasted TO as they had already called down for the review. The booth has 60 seconds to call down to the ref to review it, and they did it within that time frame.

In the end, it only really cost the Saints had they wanted to try an end of the half score.

The 2:01 second TO was more about him telling his defense he completely trusted them. It could've backfired badly if SF somehow got the first down, but the chances of converting a 2 and 19 into a first down aren't that high relatively speaking.

Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

So you're saying there is actually some small redeeming quality to his posts? Good grammar?

I know.

That's what makes him unique.



Usually, bad OPs are full of "fire Peyton! He sucks! All u guys slurp Bree's "
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

I really don't feel like explaining in detail about how good of a TO it was. So I'll just address the meme that it "only saved a second". What's better? Having an extra second or not having an extra second?


No. The question is what's better? Having an extra second or having an extra timeout?
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117700 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

The question is what's better? Having an extra second or having an extra timeout?


An extra second.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:19 pm to
Payton gets a pass here. I questioned the timeout at the 2:11 mark in the fourth because it was questionable. Since everything worked out the way it did, the timeout looks brilliant. Payton's confidence in the defense and believing the 49ers might be playing for overtime is to credit here. It was a gamble and it paid off. You cannot question success.

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115740 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

No. The question is what's better? Having an extra second or having an extra timeout?



We wouldn't have had an extra timeout.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

We wouldn't have had an extra timeout.


Yes we would. We would have used the two minute warning instead of the timeout to stop the clock. How do you not understand that?
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117700 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

You cannot question success.



I think it's good to question what worked, and why it worked.

quote:

Payton's confidence in the defense and believing the 49ers might be playing for overtime is to credit here


Absolutely, but that was based on a game's worth of asswhooping the 9'ers.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10456 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Yes we would. We would have used the two minute warning instead of the timeout to stop the clock. How do you not understand that?


And then would've had to likely use the TO to stop the clock the following play.

If it is coming out of the two minute warning, there is no guarantee that the 49ers don't run the ball forcing the Saints to use their second timeout anyhow. Instead, it nearly won the game on its own with the near safety.

Again, was it necessary to take it at 2:01? No, but it worked out how it did because of it.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:23 pm to
I bet the confederacy of dunces in this thread feel real smart now that it is established by his own admission that one of their vocal leaders(Fun Bunch) thought we wouldn't have had an extra timeout.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77582 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:23 pm to
Can we stop questioning the timeouts, please? CSP knows what he's doing, much more than us. Give it up.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115740 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Yes we would. We would have used the two minute warning instead of the timeout to stop the clock. How do you not understand that?



You are assuming that the 2 plays the 9ers call are EXACTLY the same after that, and the way Payton called the TO didn't effect their play calling.

They would have had 2 plays after the 2 minute warning instead of one...what don't you understand about that?
Posted by Chadwick
Member since Aug 2011
5084 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:24 pm to
Wow are we really complaining about a time out?


Wow..... just wow. Some people are never happy and love to b!tch.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

And then would've had to likely use the TO to stop the clock the following play


Oh the clock runs on an incomplete pass? Because that's what the next play was. Sorry, I see why everybody was jumping on me.

Sorry guys, simple misunderstanding of the rule. I thought the clock stopped on incomplete passes.

eta: yes they could run to force us to use a timeout, but then we are forcing them to limit their playbook. That's why a timeout is more valuable than 2 minute warning. You are not forced to take it when the clock is stopped anyway.
This post was edited on 11/18/13 at 3:27 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84086 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

You are assuming that the 2 plays the 9ers call are EXACTLY the same after that, and the way Payton called the TO didn't effect their play calling.

They would have had 2 plays after the 2 minute warning instead of one...what don't you understand about that?



He's smarter than you
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

We would have used the two minute warning instead of the timeout to stop the clock. How do you not understand that?


And then 49ers could have ran the ball twice after the 2 minute warning and forced us to use a timeout.

Use the timeout before the 2 minute warning and you are daring 49ers to throw the ball, which obviously Payton wanted.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 3:25 pm to
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram