- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:06 pm to PaperTiger
I'd believe PFF over NFL.com's ratings without a doubt
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:06 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Finally we can agree on something. Great Pick


Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:06 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
How do we know which one to believe?
How about an efficiency rating over the subjective opinion of a media scout.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:06 pm to PurpleDrank18
quote:
We’re not sure why Williams didn’t generate more pre-draft buzz
Utah?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:07 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
I'm a retard bc there are conflicting reports? Got it
No you are a retard because you posted a rb profile dipshit
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:09 pm to PaperTiger
The actual Marcus Williams profile does question his physicality and ability to tackle at the next level though.
LINK
quote:
WEAKNESSES Needs to add some muscle on his slim frame. More of a finesses safety than hitter. Takes the worst of it in one-on-one tackles. Can be dragged along for additional yardage. Plays with a hitch in his transition from backpedal. Occasionally follows quarterback's eyes too carefully and can be manipulated.
LINK
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:11 pm to Peazey
He's not a big hitter but specializes in the tackling arts.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:11 pm to thegodfajha
Yeah Google slipped that one by me. All Marcus Williams and then jumped to Joe Williams about 5 threads down. Then jumped back to Marcus. Wtf
google.com
google.com
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:12 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
PaperTiger
Did you even read the report before posting it?? I didn't click on link, but like a literate human being, read what you posted and could easily determine that this is about a running back.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:15 pm to brg0320
Apparently no one else bothered to follows the link or actually read the posted link.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:15 pm to brg0320
Dude. Honest mistake. When you type something in and they throw a random name in there, and you are looking specifically for "tackling", it can happen.
Let it go. I wasnt arguing the pick. I was just trying to look up another draft analysis.
Let it go. I wasnt arguing the pick. I was just trying to look up another draft analysis.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:15 pm to goatmilker
I think that I would agree that the PFF evaluation is probably better. The nfl.com profiles are usually only good to get a quick snap shot of an idea of a player. They are more about having a volume of a bunch of different players rather than very much in depth.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:15 pm to Peazey
The second guy posted a profile of a running back. Nothing is conflicting.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:17 pm to PaperTiger
I'm just pointing out that you didn't even read it
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:17 pm to St Augustine
I posted the actual profile. It did question his ability to tackle.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 8:18 pm to PaperTiger
Bruh, how can you read that analysis and not immediately know it was written about a running back?
Popular
Back to top
