- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mark Ingram/Latavius Murray stats comparison
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:46 am
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:46 am
Mark Ingram
8 years:
1321 carries
6,007 rushing yards
4.5 yards/rush
50 rushing TDs
That's 750 rushing yards/year and 10 rushing TDs/year
228 receptions
1598 receiving yards
7.0 yards/reception
5 receiving TDs
That's 200 yards receiving/year
Latavius Murray
5 years
899 carries
4.1 yards/carry
3,698 yards
34 rushing TDs
That's 739 rushing yards/year and 7 rushing TDS/year
receiving
128 receptions
883 yards
6.9 yards/reception
0 receiving TDs
That's 176 receiving yards/year
8 years:
1321 carries
6,007 rushing yards
4.5 yards/rush
50 rushing TDs
That's 750 rushing yards/year and 10 rushing TDs/year
228 receptions
1598 receiving yards
7.0 yards/reception
5 receiving TDs
That's 200 yards receiving/year
Latavius Murray
5 years
899 carries
4.1 yards/carry
3,698 yards
34 rushing TDs
That's 739 rushing yards/year and 7 rushing TDS/year
receiving
128 receptions
883 yards
6.9 yards/reception
0 receiving TDs
That's 176 receiving yards/year
12
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:50 am to TechDawg2007
One has put up top 5 stats before, and the other is Latavius Murray
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:51 am to whatiknowsofar
Top five in what?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:51 am to whatiknowsofar
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:51 am to whatiknowsofar
Similar backs but the price tag makes the difference. AK is the focus back in New Orleans now not Ingram. We need someone to compliment AK and Murray will do that very well for a good chunk of money less.
This post was edited on 3/12/19 at 11:53 am
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:51 am to TechDawg2007
But how much does he love sno-cones?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:52 am to TechDawg2007
Ingram's the better player but financial considerations have to be made sometimes.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:55 am to sanora
quote:
financial considerations have to be made sometimes.
Also, you have to look at the mileage. With the shift to two back systems with guys splitting the carries, Murray essentially has 2 seasons fewer carries than Mark.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:55 am to TechDawg2007
Murray is a good big bruising back. He’s younger as well. Thank you for your service Mark.
Nostalgia doesn’t win championships...
Nostalgia doesn’t win championships...
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:56 am to TechDawg2007
Bridgewater | Murray
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:56 am to TechDawg2007
but, will he play well with Kamara?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:57 am to tibebecolston
quote:They're both 29.
He’s younger as well.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 11:59 am to Hoodoo Man
Murray has only missed 3 games in 5 years
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:00 pm to TechDawg2007
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:03 pm to Carville
quote:
Top five in what?
Ypc, total yards in a season, total tds
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:03 pm to TechDawg2007
It sucks to see Mark Ingram move, but Loomis knows what he’s doing.
Somebody is gonna pay mark atleast double what Latavius Murray got from us, but I think Murray will do just fine. Increase Kamaras role and keep a complimentary back that runs well between the tackles at a good price.
Somebody is gonna pay mark atleast double what Latavius Murray got from us, but I think Murray will do just fine. Increase Kamaras role and keep a complimentary back that runs well between the tackles at a good price.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:07 pm to whatiknowsofar
One had an all-time great QB while playing in one of the best all-time offenses; the other is Murray.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:08 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:I feel like Murray will be GREAT for us
One had an all-time great QB while playing in one of the best all-time offenses; the other is Murray.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:20 pm to TechDawg2007
Just got back to respond to all this. I think MI was asking too much.
So did MI fall short of Dueces rushing record?
So did MI fall short of Dueces rushing record?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:21 pm to lionward2014
my biggest concern in this whole deal is right there in that gif. MI was one of the best protection backs in the league. I get the money and we had to let him walk, but we can’t make a SB if drew is on his back.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News